Post your hardware expectations that Apple CANNOT top!

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 37
    katekate Posts: 172member
    [quote]Originally posted by Willoughby:

    <strong>Hey Kate, did you make that yourself or get it from some other site? That is sweet.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    No, this is a spymac fake. Follow the image link.
  • Reply 22 of 37
    willoughbywilloughby Posts: 1,457member
    [quote]Originally posted by Kate:

    <strong>



    No, this is a spymac fake. Follow the image link.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Maybe its just me, or my stupid PC at work but your image doesn't seem to link to anywhere.
  • Reply 23 of 37
    Spymac notwithstanding, I agree with Kate.



    And for the first time in history, I agree with Fran.



    SdC
  • Reply 24 of 37
    jutusjutus Posts: 272member
    Moogs, obviously you haven't been reading the boards, so I will spare you the embarrassment. An insider, oh, let's just call him "Mastergating", has already leaked info that the next version of OS X released at MWSF will be "the 64 bit one".



  • Reply 25 of 37
    macaddictmacaddict Posts: 1,055member
    What can't Apple top?



    Make a computer that I want to buy. There isn't a single computer that I'd buy from them right now...either crappy expansion or bloated price. $1700 for an entry-level tower is outragous.
  • Reply 26 of 37
    [quote]Originally posted by jutus:

    <strong>







    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I actually have this machine in my bedroom! It was SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEET in it's day

    I still like the idea of running WinBlows Apps on my mac...yeah PCs are cheap now, but for a college student having two computers in a dorm room is not that practical (actually three with my iBook). Plus all these freak-ass profs that demand you work on WinBlows or heaven forbid you go to a university where they require you to purchase a cheap compaq or IBM laptop...it would be cool. I would be like, hey, this Mac runs that cap better than that POS machine does.
  • Reply 27 of 37
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 17,746member
    well, I think this would qualify:



    2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.4 Dual PM G5's

    333mhz Bus/RAM

    SuperDrive 2

    80, 100, 120, 2x 80 GB

    Redeon 7500, Radeon 8500, Redeon 8500

    Raycer derivative graphics accel. in top 2 models

    1599, 2399, 2799, 3499



    17" Display bundle +$400

    19" New Display bundle +$600 higher res

    24" New Display bundle +$1200 higher res



    867, 1ghz, 1.2 GHZ iMac G4

    LCD 15" Widescreen

    133mhz Bus/RAM

    CD-RW, CD-RW/DVD, SuperDrive 2



    iBook G3 1GHZ Sahara

    13" screen



    OSX Default
  • Reply 28 of 37
    Quad 2.8 Ghz G5

    8MB L3 Cache

    1 GB RAM, upgradable to 4 GB

    100 GB 15,000 RPM hard drive with 8MB cache

    Superdrive

    100x read/40x Write/24x ReWrite CD-RW drive in the Second 5 1/4" drive bay

    An open front accessible 5 1/4" drive bay (rails to adapt a 3 1/2" drive included in the box

    Airport card bundled

    6 PCI Slots

    1 8x AGP Slot occupied by GeForce3 Ti500 with 128MB of RAM

    Four USB Ports, Two Firewire Ports on the rear of the unit

    two USB Ports, Two Firewire Ports on the front of the unit

    Mac OS 10.2 preinstalled as default OS

    Polished Stainless Steel enclosure with Apple logo etched on each side of the unit.

    $2999

    $100 instant rebate if you bring in an OEM or retail Windows XP disc and run it through the disc shredder now prominently on display in the Front of every Apple store



    There, this is a rumors site, this is what I have posted as my expectation. Let's see Apple beat that!

  • Reply 29 of 37
    kidredkidred Posts: 2,402member
    What SDW2001 said
  • Reply 30 of 37
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 17,746member
    [quote]Originally posted by KidRed:

    <strong>What SDW2001 said </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I also think this is technically feasible.



    Note my new Sig!
  • Reply 31 of 37
    Compatability would be a shock.

    Really folks- take a lesson from Linux.. unless you find a way to run the same applications that a MS PC can, you're stuck in left field.

    "Out of the box" would be seeing all the fabulous power and security MAC owners rant about driving MS applications.

    I'm by no means suggesting MS is a better platform, but if you want MAC to grow, stop narrowing the scope of the market.

    First MS grabbed hard core business machines.

    Next it was the user interface "theft" -if that makes you happy.

    Games... It's your preferance -but when has a MAC made any headlines?

    Then imaging applications.. perhaps not nearly as fast, but fast enough for a wider market share and nearly all the same features..

    Look at XP and notice that interfaces are swirling closer.

    Cry and stamp your feet over who did what better or first... business has better things to do than listen to that.

    Produce a product that can complete.

    iPod is a year late and propriatary -again-.

    God help MAC if their big surprize is something that we've all seen before. A flat screen monitor or a handheld ain't news. Wireless ain't even news. Segway was only news.

    You can't expand your private planet MAC without giving the Universe something it can communicate with.

    The greatest and most impactful thing Apple could do is join the game.
  • Reply 32 of 37
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    The iWalk
  • Reply 33 of 37
    Denver, it's "Mac", not "MAC". It is short for "Macintosh", not an acronym.
  • Reply 34 of 37
    jrcjrc Posts: 817member
    Ha ha!



    I predicted/named iPad (to manage Mac servers, too!) in 2002!



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by JRC View Post


    I am up to Apple's challenge. This rumor site/board will not be awestruck. It's impossible. We cannot be topped.



    I say that if Apple does NOT deliver a quad G5-based Server with full raid/hot swap/airport-managed via iPad/iWalk/etc, then I will not be blown away.





    If Apple does not deliver a capable and compatible Newton replacement, I won't be blown away.



    If Apple does not deliver another consumer gadget (not PDA) then I won't be blown away.



    JRC



  • Reply 35 of 37
    jrcjrc Posts: 817member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fran441 View Post



    So even if Apple met those expectations and more, you'd be disappointed because they couldn't keep up with that type of pace?



    Please.



    Still no mid-level, prosumer desktop/tower thingy. :( 

  • Reply 36 of 37
    Originally Posted by JRC View Post

    Still no mid-level, prosumer desktop/tower thingy. :( 



    Nor will there ever be.

  • Reply 37 of 37
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    Do you guys work part time as grave diggers. It is the only explanation for a thread this old being responded too.
Sign In or Register to comment.