Closing the book on Apple's Mac mini

1232425262729»

Comments

  • Reply 561 of 570
    pmzpmz Posts: 3,433member
    So... Having read that AI article from 2007... I'm wondering if said author has taken on a wider knowledge of industry since then? Even in 2007 it was obvious that the Mac Mini still had a long long future as a server. I guess the wisdom of Apple "Insider" doesn't include knowledge of the way these products are commonly used?



    Ask any of the owners of Mac Mini server farms all over the world what the future of the Mac Mini is. They'll laugh out loud if you suggest that it's a dead product. Years ago or yesterday.



    The Mac Mini is a more common and valuable server product than the XServe. Yes, it really is
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 562 of 570
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    Ladies and gentlemen, AppleInsider believes in all sincerity that the Mac mini is dead.



    Poor Mac Mini. I can't believe it died like this.





    Oh wait.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 563 of 570
    nvidia2008nvidia2008 Posts: 9,262member
    The title is interesting... It was written at a time when it did look like the Mac mini was destined to be killed off. Times change.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 564 of 570
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 565 of 570
    flaneurflaneur Posts: 4,526member
    applezilla wrote: »

    Still time to get one as a collectible.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 566 of 570
    nhtnht Posts: 4,522member

    Quote:



    On the Future of the Mac Mini ?


    Kasper Jade, AppleInsider:


    Therefore, it comes as little surprise that sources, for whom AppleInsider holds the utmost respect, are now pointing towards the mini’s impending demise. […]


    Ladies and gentlemen, AppleInsider believes in all sincerity that the Mac mini is dead.


    I’d be worried if this article weren’t from 2007.





     


    http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/01/22/mac-mini


     



     


    I have no idea why Gruber picked this out today.  Did Kasper pee in his cherrios or something happen to the mini? 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 567 of 570
    nhtnht Posts: 4,522member


    Do you guys really believe hiding my post here means anything after you guys got fireballed?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 568 of 570
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,954member
    nht wrote: »
    Do you guys really believe hiding my post here means anything after you guys got fireballed?

    ?

    Your other post is visible. I saw it yesterday. I don't see any posts marked as deleted.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 569 of 570


    Originally Posted by nht View Post

    Do you guys really believe hiding my post here means anything after you guys got fireballed?


     


    I just moved it here because it's directly relevant to this thread (since it's THE thread) and it had already been necro'd by someone else earlier. Nothing hidden about it. Look, I'm even bumping it back up by replying again. It's now at the top of the New Posts page as well as the subforum in which it resides.


     


    If the site owners wanted to hide their mistakes or their blatant lies (like the despicable people at MacOSRumors do), they would have long ago edited this entire thread or deleted it outright. Or even not long ago; since it just came to light again, they would have acted on it after Gruber's post. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.