I really don't give a rats ass about the dam Apple vs Samsung lawsuit. Is the technology field so slow these days that the site needs to fill up the pages with the boring legal wrangling between these two companies? Can we get back to reporting on real technological innovations?
Wow. The judge comes off as a bit thin-skinned. What the heck is so wrong with Apple and Intel asking her to bar a defense witness because he didn't address some NDA issues, they waited thinking he and Samsung would, but Samsung sprung him on them anyway? What else were they supposed to do?
If anything, for Intel to come back and say the equivalent of, "sure, let him go ahead; but please discipline Samsung for pushing the envelope" was magnanimous. And reasonable.
Asking to bar a defense witness is fine. Doing it at the very last minute is a dick move.
<span style="font-family:'lucida grande', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', tahoma, sans-serif;line-height:18px;background-color:rgb(227,244,255);">I really don't give a rats ass about the dam Apple vs Samsung lawsuit. Is the technology field so slow these days that the site needs to fill up the pages with the boring legal wrangling between these two companies? Can we get back to reporting on real technological innovations?</span>
Sorry, it bothers you. For many posters in this forum (including myself) this case is actually very entertaining an educating. But if you are really so bothered, why don't you just skip all the threads concerning this case. Just an idea.
Wow. The judge comes off as a bit thin-skinned. What the heck is so wrong with Apple and Intel asking her to bar a defense witness because he didn't address some NDA issues, they waited thinking he and Samsung would, but Samsung sprung him on them anyway? What else were they supposed to do?
If anything, for Intel to come back and say the equivalent of, "sure, let him go ahead; but please discipline Samsung for pushing the envelope" was magnanimous. And reasonable.
*bang bang bang* (Bangs gavel)
"I won't have theatrics in this court room!"
*bang*
*bang* *bang*
"No theatrics!!"
*bang* *bang* *bang*
"No theatrics I say!"
*straightens robes*
I suspect that the 'theatrics' were mostly in the reporter's mind. There have been a number of times in this case where the judge made what appeared to be a very reasoned, well thought-out ruling and the reports made it sound like she was standing on the desk screaming and yelling.
As i predicted It looks like lucy KOhREA is taking sides with samscum. ONE HUGE obstacle that could make apple lose the case is the judge and her korean background.
Lucy Koh is the most prominent korean American Judge in US. How unbiased she is when it comes to moderating the case? Koreans view Samsuck as the pride of korea. The company and all its subsideriaries samsuck (semiconductor mfg, samsung motors etc) represents over 50% of korea GDP and is the largest employer in Korea by far. Lucy Koh was educated in America but I am sure her heritage and conservative korean upbringing impacts her decision one way or another.
samsuck, lotte and hyundai single-handedly bankroll south korea, Lucy Koh could be receiving intense cultural pressure from the "korean community" to protect Samsung, and there is a possibility that her or her family will be financially rewarded for doing so. Samsung would rather pay-off korean American lucy than pay billions to apple in damages. Trust me, Samsung sees her ethnicity (and loyalty) as an advantage.
I hope the judge DOES NOT screw apple and America over...
Is this person for real and just making unsupported opinions from some twisted dark hole in his head. This comment such bullshit, not sure if any words to describe, how far off base you are. Really trust you, have you been following the case, I think Samsung had it rough from the judge and too right to.
Samsung "should" get their butts handed to them. But that's not whats going to happen. Judge Koh is more than likely going to spank them both and send them to bed without supper which would actually be a win for Samesung and they will just carry on copying.
The message sent will be that it's okay to copy answers off of your neighbour's paper rather than do your own work. Crap, the rest of us learned that was wrong in grade one. I hope Apple dumps Samesung as a supplier as soon as they are able to.
Comments
"That's it, I want to see papers! Please email them to my iPhone."
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasanman69
Like these theatrics? Thanks for the idea daratbastid
That is so funny. LOL. I watched it about 15 times. Belly laugh and sore gut.
I really don't give a rats ass about the dam Apple vs Samsung lawsuit. Is the technology field so slow these days that the site needs to fill up the pages with the boring legal wrangling between these two companies? Can we get back to reporting on real technological innovations?
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram
Wow. The judge comes off as a bit thin-skinned. What the heck is so wrong with Apple and Intel asking her to bar a defense witness because he didn't address some NDA issues, they waited thinking he and Samsung would, but Samsung sprung him on them anyway? What else were they supposed to do?
If anything, for Intel to come back and say the equivalent of, "sure, let him go ahead; but please discipline Samsung for pushing the envelope" was magnanimous. And reasonable.
Asking to bar a defense witness is fine. Doing it at the very last minute is a dick move.
Sorry, it bothers you. For many posters in this forum (including myself) this case is actually very entertaining an educating. But if you are really so bothered, why don't you just skip all the threads concerning this case. Just an idea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
I raise you...
For the young whipper-snappers in the audience, the talented gentleman in the clip is Donald O'Conner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_O'Connor)
*bang bang bang* (Bangs gavel)
"I won't have theatrics in this court room!"
*bang*
*bang* *bang*
"No theatrics!!"
*bang* *bang* *bang*
"No theatrics I say!"
*straightens robes*
I suspect that the 'theatrics' were mostly in the reporter's mind. There have been a number of times in this case where the judge made what appeared to be a very reasoned, well thought-out ruling and the reports made it sound like she was standing on the desk screaming and yelling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeshima
As i predicted It looks like lucy KOhREA is taking sides with samscum. ONE HUGE obstacle that could make apple lose the case is the judge and her korean background.
Lucy Koh is the most prominent korean American Judge in US. How unbiased she is when it comes to moderating the case? Koreans view Samsuck as the pride of korea. The company and all its subsideriaries samsuck (semiconductor mfg, samsung motors etc) represents over 50% of korea GDP and is the largest employer in Korea by far. Lucy Koh was educated in America but I am sure her heritage and conservative korean upbringing impacts her decision one way or another.
samsuck, lotte and hyundai single-handedly bankroll south korea, Lucy Koh could be receiving intense cultural pressure from the "korean community" to protect Samsung, and there is a possibility that her or her family will be financially rewarded for doing so. Samsung would rather pay-off korean American lucy than pay billions to apple in damages. Trust me, Samsung sees her ethnicity (and loyalty) as an advantage.
I hope the judge DOES NOT screw apple and America over...
Is this person for real and just making unsupported opinions from some twisted dark hole in his head. This comment such bullshit, not sure if any words to describe, how far off base you are. Really trust you, have you been following the case, I think Samsung had it rough from the judge and too right to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinney
I'm warning you! If you don't straighten up and fly right.............I'll warn you again!
I really, really, REALLY mean it!
Reminds me of a British bobby. "Stop! Or I'll yell stop again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
The UN's gonna sue Koh for copying.
Haha, nice - I see what you did there.
Samsung "should" get their butts handed to them. But that's not whats going to happen. Judge Koh is more than likely going to spank them both and send them to bed without supper which would actually be a win for Samesung and they will just carry on copying.
The message sent will be that it's okay to copy answers off of your neighbour's paper rather than do your own work. Crap, the rest of us learned that was wrong in grade one. I hope Apple dumps Samesung as a supplier as soon as they are able to.
Originally Posted by Bilbo63
The message sent will be that it's okay to copy answers off of your neighbour's paper rather than do your own work.
Then Apple will appeal, go somewhere else, do it all over again, and win properly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
Then Apple will appeal, go somewhere else, do it all over again, and win properly.
You may be right, but I'm not holding my breath.