Geez........Sony has a VAIO w/dvd burner for $1199.99!
<a href="http://r4.us.rmi.yahoo.com/rmi/http://www.sonystyle.com/vaio/digitalstudio/hot_dvdrw.shtml/rmivars?target=_top" target="_blank">http://r4.us.rmi.yahoo.com/rmi/http://www.sonystyle.com/vaio/digitalstudio/hot_dvdrw.shtml/rmivars?target=_top</a>
That's pretty damn good if you ask me. Just a short while ago dvd burners were $900. Now they are in $1200 PCs......
That's pretty damn good if you ask me. Just a short while ago dvd burners were $900. Now they are in $1200 PCs......

Comments
Sony has been impressing me lately with their desktop systems.
My poor credit card.
Personally, as Sony isn't even using its own technolody in its VAIOs, I think it would be a dumb idea to buy a DVD+RW drive.
You could buy a display equivalent in price to the cinema display with this comp and still come in under the loaded G4's price WITHOUT a monitor. WTF?
<strong>GD!
You could buy a display equivalent in price to the cinema display with this comp and still come in under the loaded G4's price WITHOUT a monitor. WTF?</strong><hr></blockquote>
That's one of the big reasons Apple only has the marketshare it does.
Dream scenario?
Mac OS X on some of these nicer, well-designed and feature-laden PC boxes if Apple is going to continue to be behind the curve in certain areas.
That whole "missed the boat on CD-R" thing should've tipped us off quite loudly that Apple, cool as they can be, don't always have both hands on the wheel and have LOTS of room for improvement/act-getting-together.
It was great that they got DVD-R in before anyone else (Well, they managed to ship just before Compaq, who announced the day before Apple), but they're not running with the ball and making it available to as many users as possible.
<strong>But you still have to run Windows on the Sony
That's the only reason why it sucks. Otherwise it seems like the perfect computer.
<strong>Doesn't the encoding of DVDs on PC's take an extraordingary amount of time? Anyone have any comparisons of G4 vs PC encoding times? I was under that impression that the altivec enhancement in idvd and dvd studio pro were the reasons that dvd burning was viable. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...</strong><hr></blockquote>
current PCs probably do it about as fast, maybe a bit slower but it really depends on the software
I want Apple to sell tons of machines but as is obvious in this and other threads, you can be a Mac fan without drinking the kool-aid. Apple needs to stop ripping us off and offer some competitive desktops. NOW!!
Nick
That also isn't a superdrive, either, it's just a straight out DVD burner from what I can see. DVDs only, and then it has a CDROM b/c that drive can't even read CDs.
The video card is also a piece of crap--I have one in the machine I'm on right now--it's great if you're looking for something that is as cheap as it gets, but come on? Would a GeForee2MX have killed Sony?
It's a nice computer, I'll give it that, but you have to run Windows on it, you get less expansion than on a G4, and the hell you're probably going to experience with those drivers and burning DVDs on a PC will make the Mac worth the extra cash.
I saw a guy on TechTV try to burn a DVD on a PC last night. I was nearly in tears I was laughing so hard. It was pathetic. This isn't a machine that normal people will be able to figure out.
<strong>You have to remember that while it's still old technology for a video card, I bet the TNT2 32MB can perform quite a bit better than the 16MB Rage 128 Ultra we get in the iMacs in that price range.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly, that's one of the reasons why I think overall the Sony is a pretty good deal.
I'd put the TNT 2 in the same league as the Voodoo 3.
rage = not bad, on the way out
by springtime, gf2mx will be what the rage 128 varieties were/are...
gf2mx 32mb in iMac... radeons probably still in the portables, but 16 on iBook, 32 on PB