pscooter63 wrote: »
my ipad already beams prime content to my apple tv, and i dont have to switch inputs or do anything, and my existing remote controls it. only downside is the audio stream. so not worth the hassle of another input/activity mode for the amount of time i want to use Prime over netflix or itunes.
sounds like a lot of hassle while on vacation -- bring a TV dongle, and a remote, and futz w/ inputs, on someone else's tv? why do that when i can just flip open my ipad and zone out before bed to something meaningless?
You are a 1%
Apple is concerned about the 99%
indeed. im a tech nerd and run a Plex server, but even i didnt know devices could stream .ISO files. no way in hell apple is solutioning for that outlier use case.
$2/day for any single channel (I know ESPN has a ton of specialized channels) is too much for me but I do like the idea of unhooking channels from cable/satellite and letting people pay for what they want without having to also have a cable/satellite subscription. Hopefully this is coming soon with the recent announcements but I'd hope for something less than streaming Netflix, or around $4-$5/month per channel.
Well, if you'd like to get the ball rolling, here's some thoughts for some state or municipality if they have the guts to say/do to the providers (Comcast, Charter etc), greatly simplified, but you get the idea-
1) Separate into a stand alone company to provide internet service (ie cable wire installations etc). Provide the price for internet access only, subject to review (ie you are a freak'n utility).
2) Separate company that offer content packages. And these two services shall not meet (ie no bundling to internet). They shall be not tied to each other in any manner.
3) Other provider(s) may shall have equal access to use this 'pipeline'. (competition, what a concept)
4) All these companies shall post all 'the regular' prices in an easy to view manner. Make clear all 'special' prices and when they expire.
And if you want to be a real rabble rouser, try this one on - any sports event using any ounce of public money (stadium, parking etc, ie its a 'public event') shall allow any person attending that event the right to record and re-broadcast the event... real time! Whoo- hoo that would ruffle some feathers.
That's why it's still a race ;-)
When they throw one in with a TV purchase, that's the bottom.
I like how it’s competing with Chromecast and not Apple TV.
They know they don’t even remotely have a real solution here, so they’re going with what they figure they can beat.
They already compete with Apple TV with Amazon Fire TV:
In most instances research takes only 1-2 minutes.
After months of waiting for an new apple TV (we are an apple household), I finally ended up buying an Amz Fire TV box a couple of months ago, and I'm really happy with it. The main advantage it had over other similar devices is that it has support for XBMC without having to jailbreak it (being an android box). XBMC is the media center software I use on all my TVs.
With the ability to run XBMC on the same box/device as what I use to stream netflix, I get the best of both worlds.
It sounds like this dongle will also allow you to run XBMC. If that's the case, I can replace the laptop I have connected to my main tv and use this $20 device as the netflix/XBMC/WatchDisney/WatchESPN device.
Apple needs to update the apple TV and provide easier local support for your movie library (support playing .iso files). (or let me install XBMC without having to jailbreak it).
just import your files into iTunes. the end.
I always make sure the stuff I get or rip is in MP4 format; or use handbrake to re-encode. its really not a big deal, for me at least.
Yes you can. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/photo-cast-for-chromecast/id733144626?mt=8
rob53 wrote: »
True, and I have one spare port, but this device isn't going to stream my music, TV shows, or movies from my Mac and I don't care to pay Amazon to get reduced shipping on the few things I buy from them so it's redundant since I already own an AppleTV. Like I said before, I see this device as a trojan horse for Amazon, getting another device into the house to push it's Amazon Prime service(?), which in turn pushes it's Walmart-online-type store.
Streamed ESPN is probably the holy grail. The thing is, ESPN gets on the order of $3-$4 dollars/month for their basic channels (ESPN and ESPN2) from the cable/satellite companies for every single subscriber, regardless of whether subscribers want it or watch it. If ESPN were to offer ala carte subscriptions, the cable and satellite companies would drop ESPN in a heartbeat, and that's where ESPN gets the majority of the revenue they use to pay for the high-dollar sports content deals from the leagues.
You are correct: this is all about the economics for the content provider. This was what Steve first cracked with the music industry with iTunes and the iPod. No one wanted to pay $20 for a CD to get just the songs they wanted. Thus Napster and Pirate Bay were born; and were real threats. The music industry changed.
ESPN is not actually the content creator. As you correctly point out, they have licensed the content from the leagues. Note though that MLB and NHL (and I think NBA) now all sell their content directly. Only the NFL is the holdout so far. And of course, there are other sports.
But these league offerings are season pass deals. When they come available as day passes only...watch out. When ESPN or the content owners get to the point HBO GO has - that they can get more revenue and growth in revenue directly from consumers without the cable company middle man, we'll be on to something.
sog35 wrote: »
You are a 1%
Apple is concerned about the 99%
Agreed. Many observers thought the "it's been way too long" moniker of the October event was aimed directly at ATV. It seems a little long in the tooth in many aspects. I use mine and like it. But it could be better in ways that should seem obvious to AAPL.
andysol wrote: »
Amazon is run by morons.
pazuzu wrote: »
Perfect for the beach house.
rob53 wrote: »
Won't work for me since I route everything through my sound system. Plugging directly into the TV means I can only use the TV speakers not my surround sound system. Plus it's from Amazon and all it would be good for is ordering garbage from them.