Apple finds sympathetic ear in fight to remove antitrust monitor Bromwich

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 25
    elrothelroth Posts: 1,201member



    The story doesn't make clear that this chearing was not the appeal of the verdict against Apple. This is a separate matter of whether an independent monitor should have been appointed, and if the way he's doing his job is proper. Apple here is trying to get Bromwich removed.

     

    The actual judgement against Apple was appealed in December. That's the appeal that could overturn the verdict, or send it back for re-trial. It's been 3 months since that hearing, and reporters were saying that generally an appeals decision could take 5-6 months, so the suspense is building.

  • Reply 22 of 25
    elmoofoelmoofo Posts: 100member
    Lest we not forget Bromwich is freaking friends with the a judge that put him there in the first place...
  • Reply 23 of 25
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    elmoofo wrote: »
    Lest we not forget Bromwich is freaking friends with the a judge that put him there in the first place...

    WE haven't forgotten. This entire rotten scheme needs to be investigated.
  • Reply 24 of 25
    mhiklmhikl Posts: 471member

    Looks like Judge Cootie is coming out a soiled lady. She and the lawyer look like legal shysters with a plot of deception after Apple information to pad their pockets. In most jurisdictions such shenanigans would earn them both time in the clink.

    Let’s hope justice prevails and these two hooligans can share a common cell—which would save contamination to father rapers and such lesser misfits.

    I see a good plot for a very interesting movie stewing out of this sordid tale.

    Namaste and care,

    mhikl

Sign In or Register to comment.