Square pushes Apple Pay contactless reader with new $1/week installment plan

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited May 2016
For businesses interested in buying Square's new Apple Pay-compatible contactless terminal but put off by its $49 cost, a new $1-per-week installment plan option is now available.




The new 60-week payment plan carries an $11 premium over the standard cost, but gives merchants more than a year to pay it off in full.

In a statement to AppleInsider, Square revealed that about 20 percent of "micro businesses" take out loans for operational expenses, such as the tools needed to run the day-to-day business. The new payment plan is intended to reach those small-business owners who may be apprehensive about adopting new technology due to upfront costs.




The latest Square reader not only accepts contactless NFC payments such as Apple Pay, but also supports EMV chip cards. It includes a battery and connects wirelessly to iOS devices and the Square point-of-sale app to complete transactions.

The Square contactless and chip reader launched late last year directly through the company, and expanded to Apple's own retail stores this February. Square is one of the most popular payment options for independent businesses, and its push to support Apple Pay could be a major aid to expansion of Apple's tap-to-pay service found in its latest devices.

Businesses using a Square reader must pay the company 2.75 percent for each transaction. In addition to Apple Pay, the new reader supports Android Pay and Samsung Pay.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 24
    mknelsonmknelson Posts: 1,176member
    If you can't afford $49 up front…

    you have bigger problems.
    mike1theunfetteredmindnolamacguywaverboyRayz2016ksecbestkeptsecretjbdragonjony0tallest skil
     10Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 24
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,501member
    mknelson said:
    If you can't afford $49 up front…

    you have bigger problems.
    Exactly what I was thinking.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 24
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,405member
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    stanthemancalipatchythepiratejaniceandrustyredgeminipa
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 24
    adrayvenadrayven Posts: 460member
    We're the only country without contactless cards. EU, Canada, hell, Mexico is going full tap-and-pay with cards. It's secure but noooo, we have to be 'different' - even though the card readers with ENV chip reader supports tap-and-pay, they refuse to enable it. For some reason dragging the financial processing market into the present day is like pulling teeth in the US of A.
    waverboyjbdragonredgeminipa
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 24
    wigbywigby Posts: 692member
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    Disagree. This is not an "it adds up" cost. This is a payment processing system from a lucrative bunch of shoppers for $49! If it was $499, I would pause before buying. Anyone who pauses before buying this either already has a contactless payment solution in place, doesn't have a physical retail location or is just penny-wise and pound foolish and shouldn't be in any business at all.
    latifbpbobschlobnolamacguywaverboyjbdragonicoco3jony0
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 24
    bobschlobbobschlob Posts: 1,074member
    mike1 said:
    mknelson said:
    If you can't afford $49 up front…

    you have bigger problems.
    Exactly what I was thinking.
    Exactly, exactly what I was thinking.
    jbdragon
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 24
    sandorsandor Posts: 670member
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.

    and, as usual, AppleInsider simply quotes itself in the article, rather than having actual useful links to the product.

    https://squareup.com/shop/reader-contactless-chip-60-week

    $1 a week


    To the idea of $49 being "inexpensive":
    in the US, fraud liability is on the retailer if they do not use EMV chip. so that $49 also removes that liability.


    edited May 2016
    jbdragonicoco3
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 24
    bobschlobbobschlob Posts: 1,074member

    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    How is a payment terminal a "here and there" thing?
    Lunch and then an afternoon coffee with a cookie is a "here and there" thing. (for about the same cost)
    waverboy
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 24
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,454member
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    It's a one time tax write off on a capital investment. Most small businesses should be looking for those. Moreover, it shifts the liability for credit card fraud back onto the card issuer, and that's pretty cheap insurance.
    edited May 2016
    bonobobwaverboyjbdragonicoco3
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 24
    zimmiezimmie Posts: 651member
    adrayven said:
    We're the only country without contactless cards. EU, Canada, hell, Mexico is going full tap-and-pay with cards. It's secure but noooo, we have to be 'different' - even though the card readers with ENV chip reader supports tap-and-pay, they refuse to enable it. For some reason dragging the financial processing market into the present day is like pulling teeth in the US of A.
    I work in the credit card industry. Tap-to-pay cards are secure compared to shouting your card number at the top of your lungs, but that's about it. Then again, as many as seven companies see your card every time you swipe at a gas pump. The whole industry is held together with baling wire and a prayer.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 24
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,454member
    zimmie said:
    adrayven said:
    We're the only country without contactless cards. EU, Canada, hell, Mexico is going full tap-and-pay with cards. It's secure but noooo, we have to be 'different' - even though the card readers with ENV chip reader supports tap-and-pay, they refuse to enable it. For some reason dragging the financial processing market into the present day is like pulling teeth in the US of A.
    I work in the credit card industry. Tap-to-pay cards are secure compared to shouting your card number at the top of your lungs, but that's about it. Then again, as many as seven companies see your card every time you swipe at a gas pump. The whole industry is held together with baling wire and a prayer.
    Maybe you could clear up the myths about those credit card shields they sell on TV -- I've typically not been concerned about it since none of my cards are tap-to-pay capable, and my understanding is that's the only type of cards that can be skimmed, not chip & signature only.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 24
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    i disagree. $50 for a POS solution is peanuts. if your small biz can't invest fifty bucks into your POS solution, you have a hobby -- not a business.
    edited May 2016
    waverboy
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 24
    EsquireCatsesquirecats Posts: 1,268member
    "Small business owners" who think this is expensive are speaking nonsense. Card payment terminals and cash registers are significantly more than $49 + Cost of iPad. (Here the payment terminal is anywhere between $150-$400+monthly+%, a good register is between $1k-$2k)
    waverboy
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 24
    ajmasajmas Posts: 604member
    Is this available for merchants outside of the US? Couldn't see any information on this?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 24
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,769member
    wigby said:
    Headline says $1 per month.
    Article say $1 per week.

    And yes, $49 is not a split-minute decision. All of these costs add up, particularly for small businesses and sole proprietors. I currently pay $300-$400 per month just to keep my small business "in business". Adding $50 here and there is not something I'm willing to do without careful consideration.
    Disagree. This is not an "it adds up" cost. This is a payment processing system from a lucrative bunch of shoppers for $49! If it was $499, I would pause before buying. Anyone who pauses before buying this either already has a contactless payment solution in place, doesn't have a physical retail location or is just penny-wise and pound foolish and shouldn't be in any business at all.
    I have one at the checkout desk and TBH I could have done without it. It's been used a grand total of three times in 4 months, and one single time for Apple Pay. That's it.  Using the standard Square swipe reader several times a day is preferred for the time-being. 
    edited May 2016
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 24
    lostkiwilostkiwi Posts: 640member
    gatorguy said:
    wigby said:
    Disagree. This is not an "it adds up" cost. This is a payment processing system from a lucrative bunch of shoppers for $49! If it was $499, I would pause before buying. Anyone who pauses before buying this either already has a contactless payment solution in place, doesn't have a physical retail location or is just penny-wise and pound foolish and shouldn't be in any business at all.
    I have one at the checkout desk and TBH I could have done without it. It's been used a grand total of three times in 4 months, and one single time for Apple Pay. That's it.  Using the standard Square swipe reader several times a day is preferred for the time-being. 
    What do you sell, GG?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 24
    Rayz2016rayz2016 Posts: 6,957member
    lostkiwi said:
    gatorguy said:
    I have one at the checkout desk and TBH I could have done without it. It's been used a grand total of three times in 4 months, and one single time for Apple Pay. That's it.  Using the standard Square swipe reader several times a day is preferred for the time-being. 
    What do you sell, GG?
    Dreams, my friend, he sells dreams… A better Googley world… 
    edited June 2016
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 24
    Rayz2016rayz2016 Posts: 6,957member
    bobschlob said:
    mike1 said:
    Exactly what I was thinking.
    Exactly, exactly what I was thinking.
    Damn! I'm last in the queue again!

    If Square thinks $49 is the problem then I'm afraid they're looking in the wrong place. 

    If I might direct management's attention to the 2.75% transaction fee… The device is priced for the small business, the transaction fees are not. 
    edited June 2016
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 24
    ksecksec Posts: 1,569member
    transaction cost in US is RIDICULOUSLY expensive.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 24
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,769member
    lostkiwi said:
    gatorguy said:
    wigby said:
    Disagree. This is not an "it adds up" cost. This is a payment processing system from a lucrative bunch of shoppers for $49! If it was $499, I would pause before buying. Anyone who pauses before buying this either already has a contactless payment solution in place, doesn't have a physical retail location or is just penny-wise and pound foolish and shouldn't be in any business at all.
    I have one at the checkout desk and TBH I could have done without it. It's been used a grand total of three times in 4 months, and one single time for Apple Pay. That's it.  Using the standard Square swipe reader several times a day is preferred for the time-being. 
    What do you sell, GG?
    Retail/commercial graphic design and production. Primarily business services but also significant same-day/next-day image reproduction and large/grand-format graphics so some walk-in foot traffic as well. 
    edited June 2016
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.