vote: steve or no steve?

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
this topic has a pretty simple purpose. do you think apple needs and should keep steve or get rid of him? simply say



steve



or



no steve



leave commentary to other threads, such as <a href="http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=13&t=000036"; target="_blank">this one</a>
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 44
    progmacprogmac Posts: 1,850member
    no steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 44
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 44
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 44
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    woz
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 44
    Ballmer
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 44
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    if- then the real one: Gates
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 44
    Steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 44
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    No steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 44
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I hate to say this but...



    No Steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 44
    Steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 44
    matsumatsu Posts: 6,558member
    Must have commentary. As part of the cruel irony that is Apple, they need Steve. The two brands are stuck with each other.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 44
    stevesteve Posts: 523member
    &lt;--
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 44
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    [quote]Originally posted by Steve:

    <strong>^

    |</strong><hr></blockquote>



    No Steve.



    [ 01-03-2003: Message edited by: BuonRotto ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 44
    macluvmacluv Posts: 261member
    No Steve.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 44
    Jobs and Woz as advisors.

    No Steve as CEO.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 44
    ibrowseibrowse Posts: 1,749member
    Steve
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 44
    kestralkestral Posts: 311member
    Steve should do a Bill Gates, step down from the CEO position and let someone with actual business sense run the show while he takes care of the "vision thing".
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 44
    No Steve. Reminds me of Cuba -- viva la revolucion, except it's over.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 44
    thuh freakthuh freak Posts: 2,664member
    [quote]Originally posted by several Heathens:

    <strong>no steve</strong><hr></blockquote>

    the clam shows its fangs



    steve



    because i dont want amelio, and the other ass-clowns [please don't take the term offensively; i mean ass-clowns in the nicest connotation] bringing apple down. apple [the company, not the fruit] did well in the beginning, with Steve as the lord and ruler; thus apple returned to greatness when the steventh doth return[eth].
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 44
    steve



    the one thing apple can't be is boring. remember amelio?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.