Hands On: Wristcam, an Apple Watch band with dual cameras

Posted:
in Apple Watch edited May 2021
For those hoping to ditch their iPhone entirely, the Wristcam is a unique product, offering dual wearable cameras worn on the wrist that connect to the Apple Watch. AppleInsider takes a first look at the new accessory and how it integrates into the rest of the Apple ecosystem.




Wristcam was first unveiled back in 2016 under the name CMRA. Five years later, it has finally come to market under the new moniker.

In the box is a metal tin that houses the front-facing portion of the band, which has a "world-facing" camera for general pictures, and an upward-facing camera for selfies.

It also comes with separate band attachments in two sizes for wrapping around the other side of the wrist. The clasp is similar to the one found on Apple's sport bands.

The camera unit for the Wristcam sits above the Apple Watch display.
The camera unit for the Wristcam sits above the Apple Watch display.


Wristcam requires a proprietary charging cable that connects magnetically to the inside of the device. It's simple enough to attach, and works in both directions.

Our review unit, provided by Wristcam, came in black, but the camera unit itself is a hard plastic grey encased in a rubberized material that gives it its color. This means users should be able to swap out and get different colors to wear with the Wristcam if they so choose.

For a preview, here are a couple of photos I snapped this evening -- first pic taken with Wristcam, second pic from iPhone 12 Pro, for comparison. pic.twitter.com/LMbbihv1d2

-- Neil Hughes (@thisisneil)


AppleInsider spoke with Ari Roisman and Matt Frischer, cofounders of Wristcam, who explained that their backgrounds participating in board sports helped influence their desire for and ultimate development of the product. They both see the Apple Watch as an emerging standalone platform slowly becoming more independent from the iPhone, noting during our chat that there are more pixels on the watch display than there were on the first iPhone screen back in 2007.

"We're really trying to push the boundaries of how we use cameras today on the phone, and to bring that to the Apple Watch," Roisman told us.

Wristcam claims its device will last about a day on a full charge. Of course, that depends on how you use it -- whether you are taking photos or video, and whether you are manually turning on Wi-Fi mode to sync photos to an iPhone.

By default, the Wristcam synchronizes photos to the iPhone while it is charging to conserve battery life.


Left photo taken with iPhone 12 Pro, right photo taken with Wristcam (colors and lighting untouched, but compressed for web).


Images are stored on the Wristcam, and are automatically transferred to an iPhone at a later time. It has about 8 gigabytes of onboard storage, so it can save plenty of high-definition photos and video clips before needing to be synchronized to your phone.

But the biggest appeal of the Wristcam is ditching your iPhone entirely. As anyone who has ever gone out for a quick errand or a jog with just their cellular Apple Watch knows, the one thing you will miss is having a camera on you.

Wristcam addresses this by offering a native watchOS app that connects directly to the band wirelessly, independent of the iPhone.

With the Wristcam app on Apple Watch, users get a live viewfinder of what their camera sees, basic controls for swapping between the cameras, and options to take a photo or record a video. Recently captured photos can also be viewed within the Apple Watch app without the need to have an iPhone nearby.

Two cameras are included in the Wristcam, to photograph yourself or something nearby.
Two cameras are included in the Wristcam, to photograph yourself or something nearby.


If you don't want to use the Wristcam app, or you want to snap an image in a pinch without using your watch as a viewfinder, there is a discreet camera shutter button on the front of the device.

Roisman and Frischer said they particularly appreciate using the combination of the Apple Watch and Wristcam in a completely hands-free mode, using third-party "Hey Siri" integration via Apple's Shortcuts app to trigger photo and video capture via voice.

The charging point within the Wristcam band.
The charging point within the Wristcam band.


They're both the first to admit that Wristcam will never compete with the latest and greatest iPhone camera, but that's not the point. They view Wristcam as a lightweight, convenient wearable camera that adds value and functionality to the Apple Watch.

Given the limitations of watchOS as a platform and the Apple Watch as a device, Wristcam has put an impressive amount of effort into making the experience as seamless as possible. Roisman noted in our interview that the Wristcam is the first -- and currently only -- smart band on the market to receive official Made for Apple Watch certification from Apple.

Wristcam is priced at $299 for both the 42/44mm and 38/40mm sizes. The company is offering AppleInsider readers a $40 discount with the promo code INSIDER40.

AppleInsider will have much more on the Wristcam in our upcoming review. If you have anything you'd like to see addressed in the review, let us know!

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    JapheyJaphey Posts: 1,772member
    Yes! Because more cameras is exactly what the world needs. 
    napoleon_phoneapartHank2.0watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 10
    XedXed Posts: 2,823member
    If this could integrate so it could do FaceTime from the Watch I can see it being more popular.

    Japhey said:
    Yes! Because more cameras is exactly what the world needs. 
    Is that a reason for this to exist even though neither of us want or need this?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 10
    ITGUYINSDITGUYINSD Posts: 536member
    I think this is something Apple should have innovated.  With the independence of a cellular Apple Watch, it would be nice to be able to shoot a high-quality pic every now and then when I'm away from my iPhone! 
    seanj
  • Reply 4 of 10
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,267member
    I think these guys have rally tried to think this through. So kudos. There will be a market for this and the design isn’t too clunky.  If it does OK in the market, I wonder if they will do another model that is just FaceTime with just a selfie cam? That would be even less clunky but lose the outwards facing camera I suppose. 
    The whole thing is more complicated than it seems, so A for the effort.
    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 10
    JapheyJaphey Posts: 1,772member
    ITGUYINSD said:
    I think this is something Apple should have innovated.  With the independence of a cellular Apple Watch, it would be nice to be able to shoot a high-quality pic every now and then when I'm away from my iPhone! 
    Who says they’re not? They probably have 5 prototypes being working on right now. They’re surely waiting until they can produce one that doesn’t look like the one above. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 10
    marc gmarc g Posts: 65member
    I was an early bird supporter of this project and finally got mine a few months ago. While I had hoped the final product design would have matured a bit more after 5 years, I’m still fairly happy with it. I certainly don’t wear it all the time but it’s a fun add on. 
    fred1jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 10
    iOS_Guy80iOS_Guy80 Posts: 885member
    I use my watch while I swim each day. Wonder if this Wristcamera is waterproof for taking photos underwater?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 10
    sloth77sloth77 Posts: 37member
    Xed said:
    If this could integrate so it could do FaceTime from the Watch I can see it being more popular.

    Japhey said:
    Yes! Because more cameras is exactly what the world needs. 
    Is that a reason for this to exist even though neither of us want or need this?
    I think he was being sarcastic.....
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 10
    petripetri Posts: 122member
    I guess it’s impressive that they’ve taken this so far, but the problem they have is that if there were a genuine market for this, Apple would already be all over it with a better and more integrated product.

    If they end up proving there is a market for it, Apple will again be all over it with better product.

    Either way, Apple are never going to allow this to have the kind of tight integration into WatchOS that would make it truly worthwhile.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 10
    Hank2.0Hank2.0 Posts: 151member
    I WANT MY DICK TRACY WATCH! That has been my mantra ever since I heard rumors of the Apple Watch. For those of you who don't know who Dick Tracy is, he is a cartoon character in the days when comics where found in newspapers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Tracy). We're talking the 1930's and, appropriately enough, he was a police detective fighting organized crime. After WW2, late 1940's, Dick Tracy sported a 2-way radio watch reflecting the technical development spurred by the war. Then in the 1960's, to keep up with a burgeoning transistor-powered world, he got a 2-way TV watch. And after 80-odd years it looks like that is what I will get...a FaceTime watch.
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.