Snapchat says it's happy to pay Apple 30%, wouldn't exist without iPhone
Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel says the company is happy to pay Apple its 30% commission thanks to advancements in technology and software.

Snapchat is happy to pay Apple's 30% commission
Apple has been on trial against Epic Games over how it does business with the App Store and its control of the market. One recurring problem Epic has with Apple is the commission fee it charges on every sale or in-app purchase made on the platform.
During an interview with CNBC, Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel discussed the popular app's relationship with Apple. When asked about the 30% commission, he said Snapchat wouldn't exist without the iPhone.
"In that sense, I'm not sure we have a choice about paying the 30% fee." Spiegel said. "And of course, we're happy to do it in exchange for all of the amazing technology that they provide to us in terms of the software but also in terms of their hardware advancements."
Apple CEO Tim Cook says that Apple uses its in-app payment system to collect the 30% fee. Epic argues that Apple should allow alternate payment methods, but Cook says this would require Apple to collect fees another way.
Spiegel says Apple has been a great partner for Snapchat, and even the privacy changes with iOS 14.5 and App Tracking Transparency were welcome. Snapchat is moving to Apple's new ad tracking network that doesn't violate user privacy, and the transition has gone smoothly according to Spiegel.
The Epic Games versus Apple trial could affect the way Apple does its business depending on the outcome. If the judge sides with Epic, Apple could be compelled to allow alternate payment options or make other changes. Apple has already tried to assuage regulators with its small business program, but it may not be enough.
Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get the latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.

Snapchat is happy to pay Apple's 30% commission
Apple has been on trial against Epic Games over how it does business with the App Store and its control of the market. One recurring problem Epic has with Apple is the commission fee it charges on every sale or in-app purchase made on the platform.
During an interview with CNBC, Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel discussed the popular app's relationship with Apple. When asked about the 30% commission, he said Snapchat wouldn't exist without the iPhone.
"In that sense, I'm not sure we have a choice about paying the 30% fee." Spiegel said. "And of course, we're happy to do it in exchange for all of the amazing technology that they provide to us in terms of the software but also in terms of their hardware advancements."
Apple CEO Tim Cook says that Apple uses its in-app payment system to collect the 30% fee. Epic argues that Apple should allow alternate payment methods, but Cook says this would require Apple to collect fees another way.
Spiegel says Apple has been a great partner for Snapchat, and even the privacy changes with iOS 14.5 and App Tracking Transparency were welcome. Snapchat is moving to Apple's new ad tracking network that doesn't violate user privacy, and the transition has gone smoothly according to Spiegel.
The Epic Games versus Apple trial could affect the way Apple does its business depending on the outcome. If the judge sides with Epic, Apple could be compelled to allow alternate payment options or make other changes. Apple has already tried to assuage regulators with its small business program, but it may not be enough.
Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get the latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.
Comments
There are many out there and I’m not going to rehash them.
Epic’s argument for Apple having a monopoly is even more flawed as they refer to the Gaming market which includes consoles and computers.
To re-establish the definition of a market down to the iOS level (which you have to do in order to argue a monopoly exists) the unintended consequence is that anyone can define a market however they wish. For example, Epic games App Store could be defined as a market by your definition to which they would have monopoly control over. It’s fundamentally flawed and will have a mountain of unintended consequences across more than just the tech industry.
I think there's a significant argument that iOS apps constitute a market to themselves due to an effective lock in. And you can't credibly gatekeep what is and isn't a market without giving a rationalisation for making that claim.
I want to sell my potatoes ONLY in my own store, which I built it by my self.
And because I am very aware of the reputation of my store, and because I want to sell only high quality products in it, I may refuse to accept your tomatoes in my store if the quality of them is lower then the criteria I use in order to keep the good name of my store.