Twitter working on Sign in with Apple support
Twitter is seemingly working to bring Sign in with Apple integration to its iOS app, according to backend features currently hidden from public view.

Credit: Brett Jordan/Unsplash
Evidence of Sign in with Apple support for the Twitter app was uncovered by Jane Manchun Wong, a well-known researcher who has a long track record of uncovering upcoming or hidden features within apps.
According to Wong's research, there are several works-in-progress that could point to support for Apple's sign-in system. That includes a new entry description for connected accounts, a settings page, and the CSP header of Twitter's HTTP response.
Sign in with Apple was released back in 2019 to let Apple ID holders easily create accounts on other platforms. While it works similarly to other sign-in systems, Apple's version aims to be privacy-preserving and allows users to mask their email address from third parties.
While Apple allows third-party websites to adopt Sign in with Apple, its usage is not required unless specific criteria are met. For example, if an app lets users create an account using another platform -- like Google or Facebook -- then they must also offer Sign in with Apple as an equivalent option.
The Twitter for iOS app doesn't offer any sign-in options beyond its own. Back in June, Wong found evidence that Twitter was working to include integration with Google's sign-in system, which would necessitate support for Apple's, too.
Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast -- and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.

Credit: Brett Jordan/Unsplash
Evidence of Sign in with Apple support for the Twitter app was uncovered by Jane Manchun Wong, a well-known researcher who has a long track record of uncovering upcoming or hidden features within apps.
According to Wong's research, there are several works-in-progress that could point to support for Apple's sign-in system. That includes a new entry description for connected accounts, a settings page, and the CSP header of Twitter's HTTP response.
Twitter is working on Apple Sign-In integration, as indicated in:
- the entry description for "Connected accounts" settings page (WIP)
- the "Connected accounts" settings page (WIP)
- the CSP header of https://t.co/lku1DJFE5E's HTTP response https://t.co/rKdDOWLEml pic.twitter.com/cEOgOoAEx1-- Jane Manchun Wong (@wongmjane)
Sign in with Apple was released back in 2019 to let Apple ID holders easily create accounts on other platforms. While it works similarly to other sign-in systems, Apple's version aims to be privacy-preserving and allows users to mask their email address from third parties.
While Apple allows third-party websites to adopt Sign in with Apple, its usage is not required unless specific criteria are met. For example, if an app lets users create an account using another platform -- like Google or Facebook -- then they must also offer Sign in with Apple as an equivalent option.
The Twitter for iOS app doesn't offer any sign-in options beyond its own. Back in June, Wong found evidence that Twitter was working to include integration with Google's sign-in system, which would necessitate support for Apple's, too.
Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast -- and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.
Comments
And you’re quite wrong about Parler — their users were actively calling for the execution of the VP, blowing up Amazon date hosting facilities, and many gruesome descriptions of how they’d like to torture and murder people they didn’t agree with…. All of which are against the terms of service. That’s why they got booted, no moderation of calls for violence. Why is this difficult for you to accept?
FYI, your free speech rights are not broken when a private platform declines to publish your material. They don’t have to, and you can’t make them.
Again with the Parler — you continue to willfully ignore why they were blocked. You cannot have users calling for the execution of the VP, threatening to blowup Amazon, and torture-murder fantasies of another party and not expect to not be removed for violated the states terms of service.
Except news was never banned. Just lies, hate speech, insurrection, etc. that harmed society. It showed they were a responsible company.
What off-the-book evidence is there that the government is using Twitter and Facebook to do things they aren't allowed to do? Trump's accounts were banned from the platforms during the Trump administration - i.e. when he was the head of the government - and only in a very well publicised, extraordinary circumstance.