From Lightning to USB-C: The long road, and the road ahead

Posted:
in General Discussion edited October 2022
Apple, an early adopter of USB-A and USB-C connectors, will likely be forced to phase out Lightning over the next two years. Here's why, and what's likely to happen along the way.

Lightning and USB-C cables
Lightning and USB-C cables


For decades, Apple has adopted either niche connectors, or gone its own way with a cable that only it uses. But, it has just as often adopted connectors invented elsewhere.

We're coming up perhaps the largest cable shift Apple has ever made. Soon, Apple will shift away from its own Lightning because the EU says it must, to the USB-C standard it helped design.

What will this mean for the popular, but increasingly dated, Lightning connector?

The Past

Lightning was introduced in late 2012, debuting in the iPhone 5 and related iPods, and a month later for the iPad and iPad mini. Compared to its predecessor, the 30-pin dock connector, the 8-pin Lightning connector was much smaller, notably faster, and, just as importantly, reversible. The latter may have been a strong user-friendly consideration compared to the 2007 USB Micro-B standard that Android and a host of other portable devices adopted because of its small connector.

Although Apple introduced a "USB 3.0 host mode" to some Lightning-based devices in 2015, the only Apple accessory it works with is the Lightning camera adapter. Most Lightning connections use about the same speed as USB 2.0 -- 480Mbps -- which makes using it to transfer 4K HDR video files that the recent iPhones a pain, and slow.

Apple's $39 USB3 to Lightning Camera Card adapter
Apple's $39 USB3 to Lightning Camera Card adapter


Also in 2015, Apple began adopting the USB-C connector to slowly replace the USB-A, Firewire, Thunderbolt 2, and MiniDisplayPort connectors that had been the standard on Macs. Because Apple created its Thunderbolt technology in collaboration with Intel, Apple is in part responsible for the path USB and its connector types have taken, at least from USB 3.1 onwards.

The first specification named "USB-C" was submitted in 2012, and Apple was the first company to use a USB-C port in a laptop, with its 2015 MacBook. Today, most recent PCs have at least one USB-C port, and it appears to be slowly gaining ground with mainstream computer users for its wide versatility, power delivery, and speed.

The term "USB-C" generally refers to the connector form factor rather than the data or power technology behind it, which is part of the USB 3 and USB4 protocols. The actual speed achieved when plugging something into a USB-C port varies by the controller, starting with USB 3.1 and later.

Both USB 3.1 and the standardized form factor came into wider use in mid-2016, and the following year saw greater adoption still with the release of USB 3.2, which raised transfer speeds to 10Gbps or 20Gbps, and additional power delivery for charging devices -- which varies depending on the device, the cable used, and other factors. Apple has used the USB-C connector for Thunderbolt 3 since its introduction, which also supports the USB 3.x protocols.

More recent Macs have upgraded to Thunderbolt3/USB4, which is backwards-compatible with USB 3.1 but continues using the USB-C type connector. Users of recent and new iPhones, however, are still limited to using Lightning or Wi-Fi-based technologies like AirDrop for transferring files.

The Present

The current iPhone 14 family still supports only Lightning's USB 2.0 speed for data. This can be a disadvantage compared to most current Android phones, which have widely adopted the USB-C connector and USB 3.x speeds, which vary by device.

One frustrated engineer even did the work to retrofit a working USB-C connector and controller into their iPhone.





Since the changeover to USB-C as the physical connector for iPhones did not happen with the iPhone 14, it is widely assumed that this will arrive alongside the iPhone 15 lineup in 2023, giving Lightning at least an 11-year active lifespan. That said, the fact that Apple also stuck with Lightning as the physical connector for the new AirPods Pro 2 charging case might leave a door ajar for future devices that don't require USB 3 speeds or high levels of power delivery, like future AirPlay hearing aids, which could use a Lightning charging case very similar to the current AirPods cases.

Such a use would also help prevent Lightning cords from becoming e-waste in the short-term. Currently-sold Apple devices that use the Lightning connector include the entire 2022 iPhone line, the ninth-generation iPad, all EarPods, all AirPod charging cases, the AirPods Max, and all current Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse or Magic Trackpad offerings for the Mac, either included with the iMac or purchased separately.

Apple doesn't necessarily need to update that Magic Mouse and Magic Trackpad with USB-C, although we expect they will at some point along the line. The EU law does not require manufacturers to discontinue devices released before the mandate with other ports.

Because the recent iPad Air, tenth-gen iPad, and iPad mini all use the USB-C connector and USB 3.2 standard, while the iPad Pro models support the even-faster Thunderbolt 3/USB4 standard, it would seem logical for Apple to leap to using the USB-C port across their iPhone lineup in order to catch up and surpass the USB 3-era transfer speeds of its competitors. Most modern, non-Apple, devices with USB-C ports support 10Gbps speeds with a rare exception of 20Gbps and rarer-still of 40Gbps.

Apple devices with Thunderbolt 3/USB4 can support up to 40Gbps, though all of this varies depending on the cable and devices being connected. That cable mess is an entirely different story.

At present, the entire iMac and Mac notebook lines relies on the physical USB-C connector. The newest ones do sport additional connectors -- the MacBooks all have analog headphone jacks, and some offer camera-card slots and HDMI ports.

The current iMac can be configured to include gigabit Ethernet as part of the power supply brick. And, of course, the Mac mini, Mac Studio and Mac Pro offer a wealth of various ports ... even USB-A.

The Future

Given the large number of Lightning devices that are likely to linger in active use for many years to come, Apple will without a doubt continue making its Lightning adapters and Lightning-to-USB-A or USB-C adapters available for the foreseeable future. The new 10th-generation iPad includes a small Lightning-to-USB-C adapter if users are also ordering a first-gen Apple Pencil at the same time, but otherwise the USB-C port on the latest iPad means Pencil owners will need to buy the adapter separately, for $9.

Third-party manufacturers are also going to address this need, since Apple devices tend to have relatively long "in service" lifespans. Because USB-C as a connector port has shown remarkable versatility -- with additional speeds and improvements yet to come -- it is likely to continue to be a standard for longer than any of Apple's own proprietary efforts have been.

Thunderbolt 5, when it ships at some point in the next two years, will use the same USB-C connector. But, it delivers double the current Thunderbolt top speeds to 80Gbps, ensuring that the port and cable connector isn't likely to be superseded for years to come.

Of course, wireless charging technologies like Qi that Apple's MagSafe uses at its core, will also continue to be popular in the short and perhaps long-term, leaving room for various current and new options.

But, despite the Qi standard being exactly that -- a standard -- the EU is promising to look into that as well. There's no telling what's going to come from that examination.

The forthcoming Thunderbolt 5 will continue to use the USB-C connector.
The forthcoming Thunderbolt 5 will continue to use the USB-C connector.


Assuming that Apple continues expanding the use of the USB-C connector across its entire range in the next two years, consumers should be prepared for the slow extinction of "legacy" ports to accelerate. As indicated by Apple's latest MacBooks, however, the transition to all-USB C as the ubiquitous do-anything port may be slowed as peripheral manufacturers adapt.

As these former standards fade, and as we've said for years, USB-C is better embraced, than fought. And, this is despite Lightning being a connector that is designed to fail on the cable-end, versus USB-C which has a male connector integral to the device that is jacketed by the cable.

Regardless of it theoretically being a better port for mobile devices, Lightning, which set the stage for USB-C, has become yet another victim of progress due to its limits in data transfer, power capabilities, and speed -- the same as so many other connector "standards" have.

And, the governmental bodies mandating USB-C needs to put their money where their mouth is, and actually be nimble when something new and better comes along instead of just giving lip service to the possibility.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    Is it true that lighting ports have greater resistance to moisture intrusion than existing alternatives?
    pulseimageswatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 14
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,135member
    God, that connector is awful! Why does it need to protrude over an inch from the device. Will make it much harder to handle while it is charging, when compared to a Lightning connector. Been looking, but haven't found anything more compact yet.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 14
    thedbathedba Posts: 690member
    This iPhone Lightning vs USBC debate, is being met with one big yawn from the world outside online tech forums.
    While it may be somewhat important to the less than 1% of users who may have a need of transferring large files from iPhone to the other device, fact is that most of us will only use that port to charge.
    And as most iPhone users on the planet have remained loyal to Apple, we have amassed a plethora of cables and charging docks over the years that changing this would be more of a slight headache, rather than a plus. 
    But the day that Apple decides that future iPhones will come with a USBC instead of lightning, is also the day that many in media-land will be crying out "bloody murder" at Apple for having the "gall" to change their charging port "again", thus forcing the poor populace to spend their money on new charging cables/docs. 
    In the meantime EU regulators will remain quiet at all the countless SD cards that many throw away for more storage, USBA connectors on modern PC's, various incompatible charging cables for different PC manufacturers and all the HDMI cables still being sold but soon thrown away because they can't handle a 4K signal. 
    tmaymike1Alex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 14
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 6,522member
    It's worth remembering that, by government standards, this new legislation is about as nimble as it is going to get from a new legislation perspective. 

    Impact assessments, consumer and industry consultation, draft legislation and approval all take time. Then there is the obligatory transition phase to market implementation. 

    And most importantly, the EU tried to get the industry itself to resolve these problems. The industry didn't resolve them in line with the EU's goals and the result is legislation.

    Future changes on the 'wired' side will occur to the backdrop of legislation already in place and so will seem to move more quickly. 
    muthuk_vanalingamAlex1N
  • Reply 5 of 14

    And, the governmental bodies mandating USB-C needs to put their money where their mouth is, and actually be nimble when something new and better comes along instead of just giving lip service to the possibility.
    “Nimble governmental bodies” is an oxymoron.

    I’m still unsure how the USB-C port mandate will reduce e-waste. Every device I own that needs a charging cable comes with a cable. Even though I already have several cables, all different styles, any time I get a new device it comes with a cable. I guess now I’ll just be collecting USB-C cables instead of different styles but an unneeded cable is still unneeded, no matter what is on the end.
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 14
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    mike1 said:
    God, that connector is awful! Why does it need to protrude over an inch from the device. Will make it much harder to handle while it is charging, when compared to a Lightning connector. Been looking, but haven't found anything more compact yet.
    That's a Thunderbolt connector.  Apple's USB-C connectors are pretty much the exact same length as their lightning connectors.



    grandact73Alex1Nchasmdarkvader
  • Reply 7 of 14
    jdwjdw Posts: 1,167member
    Apple doesn't necessarily need to update that Magic Mouse and Magic Trackpad with USB-C...
    Insofar as the Magic Mouse needs to eliminate that stupid connector on the bottom of the mouse, I would say it does in fact need a change.
    Alex1Nwilliamlondonchasmdarkvader
  • Reply 8 of 14
    dltdlt Posts: 4member
    The EU needs to remember they would be speaking German today if not for the United States. 
    I have several expensive charging stands for my iPhone and Apple Watch. I bet they are not gonna reimburse me for their cost when I have to buy new ones. 
    Apple should stop selling their product in the EU. See how long it takes for the people to raise enough hell with the EU that they change their tune. 
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 14
    thedbathedba Posts: 690member
    dlt said:
    The EU needs to remember they would be speaking German today if not for the United States. 
    I have several expensive charging stands for my iPhone and Apple Watch. I bet they are not gonna reimburse me for their cost when I have to buy new ones. 
    Apple should stop selling their product in the EU. See how long it takes for the people to raise enough hell with the EU that they change their tune. 
    What does WWII have to do with this EU regulation? Should all American companies be exempt from EU regulations or just Apple?

    When was the last time any government or company reimburse anyone when standards changed? Were people reimbursed when Apple changed 30 pin to Lightning?
    When USBA was being phased out in favour of USBC on Apple computers?
    Why should EU citizens be reimbursed for this?

    As to your last comment, why would Apple drop such a lucrative market?  Business is obviously not your strong point, not to mention history.  


    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobradarkvader
  • Reply 10 of 14
    dlt said:
    The EU needs to remember they would be speaking German today if not for the United States. 

    WTAF? Good ole 'Murcan exceptionalism, right? What a fucking joke.
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobradarkvader
  • Reply 11 of 14
    chasmchasm Posts: 2,619member
    mike1 said:
    God, that connector is awful! Why does it need to protrude over an inch from the device. Will make it much harder to handle while it is charging, when compared to a Lightning connector. Been looking, but haven't found anything more compact yet.
    Er ... I think you may be confusing Thunderbolt cables with USB-C cables; the former tends to have a longer "grip area" with chips inside it than the USB-C only ones (which also have chips in that section). I have a couple of Lightning cables here at my desk (one USB-A to Lightning one from Apple, one being a USB-C to Lightning from a third party), and the "grip" area on the USB-C to Lightning is identical on both ends, and approximately the same size as the Apple Lightning cable -- a bit less than 2cm.
    watto_cobradarkvader
  • Reply 12 of 14
    jdw said:
    Apple doesn't necessarily need to update that Magic Mouse and Magic Trackpad with USB-C...
    Insofar as the Magic Mouse needs to eliminate that stupid connector on the bottom of the mouse, I would say it does in fact need a change.
    Which is all moot since the EC has determined that any portable device which needs to be charged must do so with USB-C.

    The EU really does think they're the king of the world.
  • Reply 13 of 14
    dlt said:
    The EU needs to remember they would be speaking German today if not for the United States. 
    I have several expensive charging stands for my iPhone and Apple Watch. I bet they are not gonna reimburse me for their cost when I have to buy new ones. 
    Apple should stop selling their product in the EU. See how long it takes for the people to raise enough hell with the EU that they change their tune. 
    … and Russian in the future.
  • Reply 14 of 14
    Yes, Apple needs to have a connector cable capable of higher throughput - USB 2.0 speeds are insufficient for todays data transfer needs.

    But … the EC has now locked us into USB-C whether it's a good perpetual choice or not.

    USB-C, like Lightning, is a flawed connector.

    Apple did have its part in designing USB-C - it is ambidextrous after all - but Apple wasn't the only voice on the committee so the USB-C connector (like previous USB connectors) is a fragile female on the plug end and a fragile male on the socket end.

    To make all this work and to increase durability, USB-C uses a high tolerance metal jacket around the plug which fits into a high tolerance slot on the socket end - meaning you can forget about blind docking peripherals as they'd yield a less-than-satisfying customer experience. A male plug and a female socket like Lightning allows for looser tolerances which makes blind docking work.

    This means you can forget about easy to use docks and peripheral connections like bedside alarm clocks - USB-C connections are just too finicky to allow for blind docking (docking without being able to see the connectors).
Sign In or Register to comment.