2022 iPad Pro review: World's best tablet gets M2 power boost - but not much else

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPad edited November 2022
While the iPad Pro still suffers from lackluster "pro" software workflows, sometimes the hardware foundation is so good, that a processor upgrade is enough.

The 2022 12.9-inch iPad Pro on the Magic Keyboard
The 2022 12.9-inch iPad Pro on the Magic Keyboard


Apple's hardware updates generally fall into three categories.

Updates are either a revamp that materially updates the design. Possibly, significant features are added. Often, a new model year brings just a specifications bump.

In a big update, we get all three. Most of the time, we get two. In 2022, Apple's iPad pro got just the third.

The iPad Pro was in a very good place that the 2021 hit, keeping the 2018 design. Instead of rocking the boat and trying to improve a very solid design, Apple decided more speed is fine.

We're reviewing both sizes of Apple's 2022 iPad Pros. We've opted for the 12.9-inch iPad in space gray and silver for the smaller.

Same good looks

Most people looking at the performance tablet will be very hard-pressed to tell any difference between the 2021 models and the class of 2022.

iPad Pro has a squared-off design
iPad Pro has a squared-off design


Both share the flat-edged design motif and an edge-to-edge display, with identical camera bumps. The dimensions and weight prove the carry-over of the previous design.

The 12.9-inch model is 11.04 inches long, 8.46 inches wide, and 0.25 inches thick, while the 11-inch model is 9.74 inches by 7.02 inches by 0.23 inches thick. These 2022 model measurements are the same as the 2021 versions.

Weight also remains the same, with the 11-inch models hitting 1.03 pounds. The 12.9-inch model weighs 1.5 pounds for the Wi-Fi model and 1.51 pounds for Wi-Fi + Cellular.

Closeup on the iPad Pro dock
Closeup on the iPad Pro dock


Apple has used this design language for three iPad Pro generations in a row, growing only the camera bump.

Then again, this isn't a new thing for Apple. We have all seen in the MacBook Pro that the company will reuse a design for years if it's working well -- and that's what we've got here.

The 2022 model still has a large edge-to-edge display with a thin black bezel around the edge, the same since 2018.

We'd heard rumors Apple would be bringing a MagSafe-like charger to the iPad's design, but those didn't materialize. USB-C remains the only charging method.

From M1 to M2

Just like the version used in the M2 MacBook Air and M2 MacBook Pro, the M2 in the iPad Pro is an eight-core CPU with four performance cores and four efficiency cores. Apple says the new iPad Pro is 15% faster than the previous model.

Paired with it is a 10-core GPU, which Apple claims provides 35% faster graphics performance in the new iPad Pros. Then there's the Neural Engine, with the 16-core machine learning component capable of up to 15.8 trillion operations per second, or 40% more than the M1.

Then there's the Media Engine, dedicated hardware encoders and decoders for H.264, HEVC, ProRes, and ProRes RAW footage. This, combined with the speed increases, make the iPad Pro a great video tool once apps like DaVinci Resolve shift over to the tablet.

On Geekbench 5, we saw the single-core score jump from 1711 to 1904. Apple promised a 15 percent faster CPU -- and that's about what we've got.

iPad Pro Geekbench results
iPad Pro Geekbench results


On the multi-core, it rose more than 15 percent going from 7100 to 8577.

The Geekbench 5 Computer test for graphics saw a roughly 60 percent boost, increasing from 20928 to 33313. In Core ML testing, the Geekbench ML test went from 997 to 1233, displaying a notable improvement in machine learning performance.

You've also got the unified memory bandwidth increased by 50% to 100GB/s. The memory itself is 8GB for the 128GB to 512GB of storage models and 16GB for the 1TB and 2TB, matching the 2021 releases.

The extra speed is welcome, as nearly any speed boost is. Given the state of iPadOS software, only those who use applications and games that can push the hardware enough will truly be able to appreciate it.

For everyone else, basic tasks will impress. Given the M1 was already quite zippy, the M2 won't necessarily seem like that much of an upgrade at first.

Hovering Pencils

The other fundamental change to the iPad Pro lineup is that Apple has introduced its Apple Pencil Hover experience. The feature allows you to hold the tip of the Apple Pencil 12 mm above the surface, without touching the display.

The iPad will then sense the position and angle of the pencil and -- maybe -- do something relevant. It works where supported across the UI with app icons swelling as the Apple Pencil crosses over the top of them.

We say maybe, because this will require more developer buy-in to become ubiquitous.

Hover effect with Apple Pencil
Hover effect with Apple Pencil


Apple's done an exceptional job with this reactive UI and has thought through many different use cases. With their own apps, that is.

For example, Apple introduced Scribble for Apple Pencil in iOS 15. With the new hover effect, bring the Apple Pencil toward a text field, and it will morph into a clear writing surface. It's so smooth.

This can also be extremely helpful to digital artists. In theory, you can see where the Apple Pencil will start drawing before the tip ever touches the surface.

Drawing preview with Apple Pencil
Drawing preview with Apple Pencil


There's still work to be done, even inside Apple's apps. Sometimes the preview dot didn't appear, while other times, it did. We couldn't determine a commonality between incidences, and it sometimes just took a second try to get it to work.

We're excited about what devs will do with this new hover feature as Apple has opened up the API. Some apps have already added support, such as Pixelmator Photo. Hopefully, other apps aren't far behind.

A missed display opportunity

The 12.9-inch Liquid Retina XDR screen still has a 2,732 by 2,048 resolution, 2,596 local dimming zones, a peak brightness of 1,600 nits, and a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio. Likewise, the 11-inch still uses an LED-backlit display with a 2,388 by 1,668 resolution and a still useable 600 nits of brightness.

Apple could've brought screen technology parity across the two display sizes, but it chose against that. This was probably done to keep differentiation between the 12.9-inch model and the 11.9. It's a disappointment, but not a massive one.

The screens also benefit from Apple's now mostly standard display features, including ProMotion adaptive refresh rates, a fully-laminated display, Wide Color (P3) support, True Tone, and the fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating.

Almost identical cameras

Again, Apple is sticking to a pair of cameras on the rear, reusing the 12MP Wide and 10MP Ultra Wide as one year ago.

These f/1.8 and f/2.4 cameras have a 2x optical zoom out and a 5x digital zoom in, True Tone flash Autofocus with Focus Pixels on the Wide, and Apple's usual software features. That means you get the Smart HDR 4, red-eye reduction, auto image stabilization, and so on.

2021 iPad Pro (bottom) with both 2022 models
2021 iPad Pro (bottom) with both 2022 models


The LiDAR scanner returns once more, providing a depth map of the area for AR apps, as well as assisting with getting focus in low-light situations.

Around the front, the 12MP Ultra Wide TrueDepth camera array is back, with a 122-degree field of view, an f/2.4 aperture, and features like Portrait mode with Portrait Lighting, Animoji and Memoji, and handling Face ID.

The only real difference this time around is with video. The 4K 60fps video capabilities at the rear now include ProRes recording at 4K 30fps, except it's at 1080p for the 128GB capacity model.

iPad Pro camera
12.9-inch iPad Pro camera module


Oddly, Apple doesn't support ProRes natively in the stock Camera app but instead forces you to use third-party apps.

The rest of the video list reads the same as usual, including 240fps slo-mo at the rear, time-lapse support, audio zoom, stereo recording, and 1080p 60fps video at the front.

A connectivity boost

For wireless connectivity, Apple has made a change to support Wi-Fi 6E. This should mean you'll get faster Wi-Fi connections, but only if the network infrastructure supports the standard.

Likewise, Bluetooth has finally moved on from Bluetooth 5.0 in favor of Bluetooth 5.3. Again, if you have hardware that supports Bluetooth 5.3, it'll benefit from a more resilient connection.

Better connectivity features
Better connectivity features


These are good -- if relatively minor -- improvements for the iPad Pro, but they read more like future-proofing efforts than features in their own right.

If you opt for a Wi-Fi + Cellular model, you'll find the connection hasn't changed much. It still supports sub-6GHz and mmWave so it will work with the still-rolling-out infrastructure.

Gigabit LTE is still there as a backup, albeit supporting 30 bands instead of 32. The reduction in bands has no impact on users in the US market.

Thankfully, Apple isn't pushing the iPhone 14's lack of a physical SIM onto the iPad Pro, as there's still nano-SIM support and eSIM.

At the base, the Thunderbolt-USB 4 port enables you to recharge the iPad Pro, connect it to devices and accessories, and an external display if you wish. The Smart Connector, used for accessories like the Magic Keyboard, also returns for 2022.

More of the same

There's little to add to Apple's four-speaker system for audio, which is the same as the last generation -- but there's not much that could be changed here. It has the neat trick of providing stereo sound regardless of the tablet's orientation, and you can't get much better than that.

The collection of five "studio-quality" microphones dotted around the iPad Pro's enclosure is paired with the speakers.

New iPad Pro logo on the back
New iPad Pro logo on the back


Then there's battery life, which involves a 28.65 watt-hour lithium polymer battery in the 11-inch model, and 40.88Wh for the 12.9-inch. This results in the usual Apple claims of up to 10 hours of usage for web surfing and watching video while on Wi-Fi or up to 9 hours when web surfing on cellular networks.

It's not quite reaching the sky-high levels of the iPhone range regarding usage time. But at least it's comforting to know it'll manage a full day of work without issue.

The list of unchanged items also extends to pricing. Apple hasn't changed them for this refresh in the US.

The 11-inch, in Space Gray or Silver, will cost you $799 for the 128GB model, $899 for 256GB, $1,099 for 512GB, $1,499 for 1TB, and $1,899 for 2TB. The 12.9-inch model is $300 more expensive across the board, starting from $1,099 and rising to $2,199.

Cellular, again, is a $200 premium regardless of configuration, making the most expensive model $2,399.

Software is still lacking

Despite Apple's gains in performance, the new iPad Pros feel almost disingenuous. What's the point of all that power without software to back it up?

We've said this in the past, but it feels more apt this year than ever. Right now, folks are still reeling from the smoldering dumpster fire that is Stage Manager.

Stage Manager was a mess during the beta phase, and Apple had to strip out functionality for the iPadOS 16.1 launch. Even the new iPad Pros don't have extended external display support until iPadOS 16.2 ships sometime later in 2022.

Using iPad Pro
Using iPad Pro


But Stage Manager still has many other issues with window resizing, odd aspect ratios, and incorrect app rotation.

Apple also made a big deal about the M2's video encoding and graphics capabilities, yet its pro-level software still hasn't come to the iPad. Final Cut Pro would be a natural fit, as evidenced by other video editors on the platform.

We're barely getting to tiptoe into the water of high-level software with some basic development tools like the ability to create apps with Swift Playgrounds.

Overall, it's frustrating that Apple has packed the iPad Pro with so much power from the M2 and has yet to bother to port its higher-end software. No "what's a computer" ad will spackle over that.

Command-C, Command-V

There is considerable crossover between the outgoing M1 iPad Pro models and the new M2 versions. Indeed, with the relative lack of material changes in the tablet line, you could almost call it lazy.

If you're being more generous, it could be an economically-sound design decision.

The 12.9-inch 2022 iPad Pro
The 12.9-inch 2022 iPad Pro


The year-ago iPad Pro lineup was exceptionally well received. Except for the whole mini-LED thing for the 11-inch model, Apple has little reason to meddle with something that works so well.

The inclusion of M2 could make the iPad Pro an even better candidate for a desktop replacement, especially for videographers. Someday, the software will support pro workflows better, but today is not that day.

That's not a product of this year's model, though. It's an ecosystem issue.

Other than a few outliers that have an M1 iPad Pro, and crave more power, there's no reason for those users to upgrade. New customers looking at more computing heft in an iPad won't care and will buy it anyway.

2022 iPad Pro - Pros

  • New M2 chip shows good year-over-year gains

  • Design still looks good, even if unchanged

  • 12.9-inch has an amazing display

  • Hover for Apple Pencil is quite useful

  • First Apple devices to support Wi-Fi 6e

2022 iPad Pro - Cons

  • Few new features

  • Hampered by lackluster software

  • Still no mini-LED on 11-inch model

Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy Apple's iPad Pro

The new M2 iPad Pro can be purchased in 11-inch and 12.9-inch configurations from popular Apple resellers, with the latest offers available in our M2 11-inch Price Guide and M2 12.9-inch Price Guide. At press time, Apple Authorized Reseller Adorama is knocking $29.01 off AppleCare for either size model with this activation link and promo code APINSIDER.

Read on AppleInsider
dewme

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 20
    This solidifies my already mostly solid decision to go with last year's model.  Thanks for the summary.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 2 of 20
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,658member
    At least it got an upgrade many Apple devices did not.
    williamlondondewmewatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 3 of 20
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,746member
    The iPad Pro might be the best argument in favor of allowing “side loading”. I’d love to install R on this thing! 
    bala1234williamlondonAlex1N
     2Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 4 of 20
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Tech blog reviewers: Not much here. Don’t buy it.

    Buying public: Nah, we’re gonna buy it anyway. Don’t care what you blabber about.
    canukstormdanoxwilliamlondondewmeAlex1Nwatto_cobra9secondkox2
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member
    Other than a few outliers that have an M1 iPad Pro, and crave more power, there's no reason for those users to upgrade.
    Is this sentence in reverse?

    If a person has an M1 iPad Pro, there is "no reason" to upgrade. This is basically true of every owner of an n-1 product. It was even true back in 2010 with iPhones when performance and capabilities were basically doubling year-on-year. Owners of 1 year products really shouldn't be upgrading. There are exceptions, but for the mass market, no.

    If a person has an A12Z, A12X, A10X or older iPad Pros, there are lots of reasons to upgrade depending on what the person wants.
    williamlondonAlex1Nwatto_cobra9secondkox2
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member

    blastdoor said:
    The iPad Pro might be the best argument in favor of allowing “side loading”. I’d love to install R on this thing! 
    There is an R programming app in the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/r-programming-compiler/id1158038782

    Every once in a while, I do some Python scripts on my iPad and Pythonista has been fine. There actually are some Linux/Unix CLI environment iPad/iPhone apps where the app is running a Linux environment, and you are using terminals with most CLI tools and common programming environments. C, C++, Lua, Perl, Python, etc.

    With extended display support in Stage Manager, it becomes a real option for me to use as a laptop replacement. Apple still needs to let these apps arbitrarily install packages that don't come with their apps though. Oh, and Keynote, Microsoft Office, etc, need to be the full featured versions. MS loves to do not implement the one feature you need on environments and OSes that are not important to them. Apple needs to get on the ball too. Everyone. iPadOS apps should have every feature that the macOS, Windows app does.
    dewmeAlex1Nwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 7 of 20
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,658member
    lkrupp said:
    Tech blog reviewers: Not much here. Don’t buy it.

    Buying public: Nah, we’re gonna buy it anyway. Don’t care what you blabber about.
    If it was a Chromebook or a Pixel the tech analysts would say buy with gusto…..
    williamlondonAlex1Nwatto_cobra9secondkox2
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 20
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,746member
    tht said:

    blastdoor said:
    The iPad Pro might be the best argument in favor of allowing “side loading”. I’d love to install R on this thing! 
    There is an R programming app in the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/r-programming-compiler/id1158038782

    Every once in a while, I do some Python scripts on my iPad and Pythonista has been fine. There actually are some Linux/Unix CLI environment iPad/iPhone apps where the app is running a Linux environment, and you are using terminals with most CLI tools and common programming environments. C, C++, Lua, Perl, Python, etc.

    With extended display support in Stage Manager, it becomes a real option for me to use as a laptop replacement. Apple still needs to let these apps arbitrarily install packages that don't come with their apps though. Oh, and Keynote, Microsoft Office, etc, need to be the full featured versions. MS loves to do not implement the one feature you need on environments and OSes that are not important to them. Apple needs to get on the ball too. Everyone. iPadOS apps should have every feature that the macOS, Windows app does.

    Does that R app actually allow for compilation of packages and execution of code on the device? The documentation is super vague, but these limitations make me think that the actual processing might be done on a server somewhere: 

    Limitations:
    - Internet connection is required for compilation
    - Maximum program running time is 20s

    What I would like is the equivalent of installing R from source on the command line on a Mac; also installing the toolchain for RStan. I don't want to just write code on an iPad and then have it run on a remote server, nor do I want to be restricted to pre-compiled packages. If I were to upgrade to an M2 iPad Pro, I would want to actually use the M2 for real processing. 

    Alex1Ndanoxwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 20
    lkrupp said:
    Tech blog reviewers: Not much here. Don’t buy it.

    Buying public: Nah, we’re gonna buy it anyway. Don’t care what you blabber about.
    Just more attempts to lure trolls here to the discussion, a la MacRumors. FFS, they gave it a 4.5, but from the title you'd think it was a piece of shit.
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member
    blastdoor said:
    tht said:

    blastdoor said:
    The iPad Pro might be the best argument in favor of allowing “side loading”. I’d love to install R on this thing! 
    There is an R programming app in the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/r-programming-compiler/id1158038782

    Every once in a while, I do some Python scripts on my iPad and Pythonista has been fine. There actually are some Linux/Unix CLI environment iPad/iPhone apps where the app is running a Linux environment, and you are using terminals with most CLI tools and common programming environments. C, C++, Lua, Perl, Python, etc.

    With extended display support in Stage Manager, it becomes a real option for me to use as a laptop replacement. Apple still needs to let these apps arbitrarily install packages that don't come with their apps though. Oh, and Keynote, Microsoft Office, etc, need to be the full featured versions. MS loves to do not implement the one feature you need on environments and OSes that are not important to them. Apple needs to get on the ball too. Everyone. iPadOS apps should have every feature that the macOS, Windows app does.

    Does that R app actually allow for compilation of packages and execution of code on the device? The documentation is super vague, but these limitations make me think that the actual processing might be done on a server somewhere: 

    Limitations:
    - Internet connection is required for compilation
    - Maximum program running time is 20s

    What I would like is the equivalent of installing R from source on the command line on a Mac; also installing the toolchain for RStan. I don't want to just write code on an iPad and then have it run on a remote server, nor do I want to be restricted to pre-compiled packages. If I were to upgrade to an M2 iPad Pro, I would want to actually use the M2 for real processing. 

    Yes, those definitely are limitations. I'm not sure why their are limitations like that, when other programming language apps are more full featured. You won't be able to do it all, but there some things that can be done. I would hope they update for iPadOS 16 as it should allow for much longer background tasking. Was frustrating that none of the reviewers even tested for background tasking or talked about it. Background multitasking is much much more important to productivity than the multi-windowing UI.

    It's similar to Pythonista, it comes with a like 5 of the most common packages (numpy, matplotlib, et al). You can run it for an unlimited time AFAIK. I run a 15 minute script one time.

    At some point in time, Apple will allow the terminal applications to download arbitrary packages. At that point, it will basically be Linux or DarwinOS in an app. With Stage Manager and rumored larger iPads coming, this will allow more and more iPads to be PC replacements and offer a bigger market for these types of apps. So, hopefully all these apps update. I've been meaning to try ish.app or a-shell.app.

    My iPP10.5 is limiting for PC workflows. Screen is too small.
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 20
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,746member
    tht said:

    At some point in time, Apple will allow the terminal applications to download arbitrary packages. At that point, it will basically be Linux or DarwinOS in an app. With Stage Manager and rumored larger iPads coming, this will allow more and more iPads to be PC replacements and offer a bigger market for these types of apps. So, hopefully all these apps update. I've been meaning to try ish.app or a-shell.app. 
    Yup -- if that happens, then I might not need a laptop. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 20
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,546member
     If a person has an A12Z, A12X, A10X or older iPad Pros, there are lots of reasons to upgrade depending on what the person wants.
    If you're using it for web browsing, reading, and writing, there is absolutely no perceptible difference. I had A12Z and now have M2 and I don't see anything different. They both are fast and snappy, even with Stage Manager on. Running benchmarks do reveal significant differences but to see the gain in performance, you'd have to do some heavy content creation like large photos or videos. 
       
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member
    netrox said:
     If a person has an A12Z, A12X, A10X or older iPad Pros, there are lots of reasons to upgrade depending on what the person wants.
    If you're using it for web browsing, reading, and writing, there is absolutely no perceptible difference. I had A12Z and now have M2 and I don't see anything different. They both are fast and snappy, even with Stage Manager on. Running benchmarks do reveal significant differences but to see the gain in performance, you'd have to do some heavy content creation like large photos or videos. 
       
    Yes, if a person is using it for light web browsing, news and time waster games. They should get an iPad 10 or an iPad Air, and get them when they are discounted.

    If a person has a lot of browser views open concurrently (heavy web browser), uses a lot of different apps and it’s their primary computer, has certain needs like low latency Pencil or programming language and whatnot, an iPad Pro should be considered. 

    Bah, content creation folks are not high end compute users. It’s like a story YouTubers and the Apple tech media tell themselves. Basically low end workstation users, which is what the Mac Studio is targeted at. 

    It’s going to be interesting to hear what they say when the iPad with M3 with say 24 GB of RAM or and M4 with hopefully 32 GB of RAM start appearing and they handle image and video processing like a MBP14/16 today. 

    Anyways, let’s all hope Apple gets all the software stuff sorted out, app developers implement all the latest features. then, there really isn’t anything holding people back from using an iPad as desktop computer, a laptop, a tablet, et al. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 20
    y2any2an Posts: 250member
    As always, why? Apple doesn’t do things randomly yet this article pretty much implies that’s what they did, a speed bump just because they could. Which given the lead the iPad Pro has on other tablets seems unnecessary. 

    I think they may have several objectives here, pick your favourites. 1, create more space between the Pro models and the non-Pro to justify the price difference. 2, seed M2 tablets ahead of upcoming iPadOS features which will benefit from M2 performance. 3, bring the Pro to a performance equivalent to M2 laptops as iPadOS evolves to bring the Pro to a near equivalent of a laptop, pulling the rug from Surface tablets and laptops. Apple has been firmly resistant to adding touch to laptops, but I’ve not heard them say tablets can’t grow up into laptop equivalents. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 20
    genovellegenovelle Posts: 1,481member
    I’ve mentioned this before,  but I believe these end of the year M2 upgrades with little else are to get ahead of a major release. The M2 will support Apple’s AR/VR technology in ways they have not yet revealed. For mass appeal, the VR headset Apple is rumored to reveal in January like the first iPhone will need to be compatible with a wide selection of Apple devices. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 20
    darkvaderdarkvader Posts: 1,146member
    I don't see why people seem to think an iPad is in any way a replacement for an actual computer.  It just isn't, and until Apple unlocks the platform, whether because they finally realize how stupid the walled garden concept is or the EU forces them to, it's never going to be.

    Even then, it'll be a crappy computer.  My favorite 2012 MacBook Pro is always going to be far more capable than a tablet because it's got a real, permanently attached keyboard, and no fingerprints on the screen.  It's got USB, Thunderbolt, Ethernet, headphone, microphone and FireWire ports.  It can run any version of Mac OS, and I do mean any version, from an emulated System 1.0 to 10.6, it'll natively boot anything from 10.7 to 10.15, 11 thru 13 with OCLP, and will probably boot 14 too.  It currently boots 10.14, because 32-bit support.

    My iPads?  They're remotes for my lights, and good at playing solitaire.  I use the mini more than the pro, because when you have to touch the screen a smaller display is actually more useful.  They're good for reading the news when I'm on the toilet.  They're toys.  Oh, and the 1st gen mini is still useful because I can use it for 32-bit apps, since Apple in their infinite customer hostility intentionally broke 32-bit software there too.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 17 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member
    genovelle said:
    I’ve mentioned this before,  but I believe these end of the year M2 upgrades with little else are to get ahead of a major release. The M2 will support Apple’s AR/VR technology in ways they have not yet revealed. For mass appeal, the VR headset Apple is rumored to reveal in January like the first iPhone will need to be compatible with a wide selection of Apple devices. 
    There doesn’t need to be any special reason for updating a computer’s computing bits on a regular basis. Apple isn’t even doing it on a yearly basis. iPad Pros are basically on an 18 month schedule or so. 

    A computer’s CPU, GPU and other computing bits are the most important part of it. An upgrade that speeds up those functions is a good! It’s a good thing in of itself. 
    watto_cobra9secondkox2
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 20
    The 11" screen is very nice, but I'm still disappointed that they didn't bring the mini LED to the 11" model. They're both iPads Pro...the only differentiator should be screen size (just as with the iPhone Pro line). I'm can only guess that the reason they didn't bring the mini LED to the smaller iPad was due to the supply chain issues that have been plaguing just about everything tech-related for the last couple of years. Hopefully next refresh in 18 months when we are past all that (I hope) they can align the features of the pro iPads.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 20
    At this point, MOAR POWAH! is all I want from my iOS devices and macs. 

    Give the iPad some real software. It can run things better than most PCs. 

    Give the max continuous spec bumps. Faster render and export times times? YES please. 

    When your work is mission critical and demanded of at the drop of a coin, you NEED every little Ounce of performance you can acquire. 

    No one wants to stall a live show because their machine can’t produce fast enough. 

    Would love to see Apple add specific silicon to chew through Adobe and 3D animation software - like they do with Apple apps. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 20
    thttht Posts: 5,883member
    jetpilot said:
    The 11" screen is very nice, but I'm still disappointed that they didn't bring the mini LED to the 11" model. They're both iPads Pro...the only differentiator should be screen size (just as with the iPhone Pro line). I'm can only guess that the reason they didn't bring the mini LED to the smaller iPad was due to the supply chain issues that have been plaguing just about everything tech-related for the last couple of years. Hopefully next refresh in 18 months when we are past all that (I hope) they can align the features of the pro iPads.
    Yes, I do wish the 11" had miniLED. Also wish miniLED made it to the Macbook Air, iMac and Studio Display too. At one point in time, Ming Chi Kuo was rumormongering that Apple had 6 miniLED devices planned. That's basically the entire lineup save for the bottom end devices. Alas, only 3 of those actually made it into production. I put the blame on the pandemic, and Intel for not increasing TB4 bandwidth to 80 Gbits/s. That basically nuked having Promotion on a 5K monitor.

    If they did put one in the 11", I think they would have to up the price to $900. They just won't have enough margin at $800. The iPad Pro 12.9 is an incredible deal imo. $1200 for a 13" miniLED, M2 w/8GB RAM, 256 GB storage. An M2 MBA is $1200 for a 13.6" LCD, 8GB RAM, and 256 GB of storage. Some pluses and minus in the intangibles. That miniLED is a big feature for video watching users. Low latency Pencil is great. It's a great hardware deal, and they must have been sorely tempted to charge $1200 for the base 128 GB version.

    Once Stage Manager has been refined, and more importantly, 3rd party apps are actually updated for Stage Manager and bring parity between Mac and iPad versions, an iPP12.9 is going to be a very nice computer for a certain class of users.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.