Australia's Apple Store workers plan Christmas strike
Workers in Apple Stores in Australia are planning to strike over pay and conditions again, this time with a walkout over the Christmas holiday period.

Strikers at Apple's Brisbane store in October 2022. Source: Cameron Atfield, Sydney Morning Herald
Following its first strike in October 2022, and subsequent plans to hold further ones when necessary, Australia's workers are preparing for a two-day walkout. It would begin at 15:00 local time on December 23, 2022, and continue throughout Christmas Eve, traditionally a particularly busy time for Apple Store sales.
According to Reuters, the strike would affect all Apple Stores in Australia, but especially the two in Brisbane, plus one each in in Adelaide and Newcastle. These are the stores with most members in Australia's Retail and Fast Food Workers Union (RAFFWU).
RAFFWU has been asking Apple for improved conditions such as fixed rosters, and an agreed annual wage rise. Reportedly, RAFFWU attempted to get Apple management to discuss the issues the week of December 5, but Apple refuses to meet until February 2023.
"This Christmas strike is a way for our members to take back their time with family and friends," RAFFWU secretary Josh Cullinan told Reuters, "while management continues to refuse to give workers the most basic minimum rostering rights."
If it goes ahead, the strike is expected to feature 200 of Apple's approximately 4,000 employees in Australia. RAFFWU's Cullinan says that Apple management will be formally notified of the strike on Monday, December 12.
If it goes ahead, the strike is expected to feature 200 of Apple's approximately 4,000 employees in Australia. RAFFWU's Cullinan says that Apple management will be formally notified of the strike on Monday, December 12.
Reuters says that Apple declined to comment on the strike or current negotations. However, a spokesperson said that Apple was "proud to reward our valued team members in Australia with strong compensation and exceptional benefits."
Alongside the two-day walkout, Australian Apple Store workers will refuse to undertake iPhone and Apple Watch repairs in certain unspecified hours. They may also refuse to wear Apple's festive red t-shirt.
Read on AppleInsider

Strikers at Apple's Brisbane store in October 2022. Source: Cameron Atfield, Sydney Morning Herald
Following its first strike in October 2022, and subsequent plans to hold further ones when necessary, Australia's workers are preparing for a two-day walkout. It would begin at 15:00 local time on December 23, 2022, and continue throughout Christmas Eve, traditionally a particularly busy time for Apple Store sales.
According to Reuters, the strike would affect all Apple Stores in Australia, but especially the two in Brisbane, plus one each in in Adelaide and Newcastle. These are the stores with most members in Australia's Retail and Fast Food Workers Union (RAFFWU).
RAFFWU has been asking Apple for improved conditions such as fixed rosters, and an agreed annual wage rise. Reportedly, RAFFWU attempted to get Apple management to discuss the issues the week of December 5, but Apple refuses to meet until February 2023.
"This Christmas strike is a way for our members to take back their time with family and friends," RAFFWU secretary Josh Cullinan told Reuters, "while management continues to refuse to give workers the most basic minimum rostering rights."
If it goes ahead, the strike is expected to feature 200 of Apple's approximately 4,000 employees in Australia. RAFFWU's Cullinan says that Apple management will be formally notified of the strike on Monday, December 12.
If it goes ahead, the strike is expected to feature 200 of Apple's approximately 4,000 employees in Australia. RAFFWU's Cullinan says that Apple management will be formally notified of the strike on Monday, December 12.
Reuters says that Apple declined to comment on the strike or current negotations. However, a spokesperson said that Apple was "proud to reward our valued team members in Australia with strong compensation and exceptional benefits."
Alongside the two-day walkout, Australian Apple Store workers will refuse to undertake iPhone and Apple Watch repairs in certain unspecified hours. They may also refuse to wear Apple's festive red t-shirt.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
Fighting for improvements should always be an option.
No they want all of the benefits of working for Apple PLUS they want more. It's pure greed.
The job is worth x dollars plus y benefits. If they can find a better combination somewhere else, then go or else shut up. It's similar to a new hire w/2 weeks of vacation complaining that an employee w/5 years has 30 days vacation. Guess what, stick around for 5 years and you will get that benefit too.
Everyone thinks they are worth more. Guess what NO YOU AREN'T.
If you want more pay works somewhere that offers more pay but you don't get employee discounts on Apple products.
No unions are similar to organized crime. You have a few bosses, aka union reps, that reap the benefits of their position all while letting the inmate think they run the asylum. So yeah, Marxist theory hard at work.
[emphasis added]
"Before you criticise a man, first walk a mile in his shoes."
I don't deny that greed is involved; then again greed is involved on both sides - the workers want to receive more, the company wants to keep more.
But read the article again. The complaints revolve around wanting fixed rosters and for the wage to increase annually - historically the latter is not an unusual thing in Australia (especially for union workers) where a wage increase that matches the change in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") is pretty common. Workers wanting their wage to keep place with inflation is not what I would classify as greed.
Wanting a fixed roster is also not greed, it's part of wanting stability and predictability in your life - and it's virtually a requirement if you are a student undertaking tertiary studies or have dependents such as children or aged parents. It's hard to square Apple's commitment to improving people's lives with a policy that can in some cases be actively harmful.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. The labour laws in Australia are still quite protective of employees, but there are quirks: for example, past a certain number of hours per week a "casual" employee cannot have a fixed weekly roster but must instead transition to "permanent part-time" status if the roster is fixed - but if the roster rotates on a predictable basis on a multi-weekly cycle the employee can remain a casual (so working in the morning one Sunday and in the afternoon the following Sunday is enough to keep the casual status). Casual employees have all of the holiday benefits of permanent employees pro-rated into their hourly pay, so the short-term cashflow can be impacted by changing status.
Good luck in your next endeavors
Most people whining about unions while enjoying the benefits of their own job, 40-hour work week, etc., are simply showing their ignorance of the subject as well as US history.
Back in the summer, Microsoft entered into a labor neutrality agreement which lets its employees “freely and fairly” unionize. That's the smart thing to do. Why is Apple acting so stupidly in this area?
Whomever at Apple is responsible for their short-sighted and counter-productive anti-union policy, needs to be shown the door.
What you describe is an HR issue. I would hope Apple has proper escalation SoPs for unfair treatment by managers.
As for CPI, when does any company provide an annual raise that keeps pace w/CPI? Not sure about Australia but in the US companies especially w/in the last 10 years and in my sector have standardized job descriptions and attempt to standardize pay for the job descriptions. Is it perfect? Are their exceptions? Of course.
Everyone knows or should know the longer you stay at a company your pay will start to stagnate when comparing to the same jobs at another company or even a new hire at the same company. In the last year there was an exodus of long term employees b/c they found significant increases over their current salaries but over time their annual increase will level that out back to the median.
What you describe is also a HR issue and would not be tolerated if brought to the attention of management and HR. In this instance "management" would be the mothership to deal w/the local fiefdom managers. Sounds like they should be put on a PIP.
Unionizing will only cement the senior bad apples in their positions and make it impossible to remediate their behavior and/or terminate.
I have this discussion way too many times. Typically, the issue is people and not the company and I see folks quit b/c their boss is an a** but complain about the "company".
If "local management" are allowed to operate in an unprofessional manner then the "local employees" need to go over their head an get the right folks involved to correct the situation. If the does not resolve the situation the maybe yes it is a problem w/the company culture but you will not fix it. Time to leave and find a place that matches your expectations.
concept.