Apple is accelerating hiring efforts for generative AI engineers
Apple is again recruiting for Machine Learning engineers for both Apple AR and "Conversational and Generative AI."

Apple is hiring AI engineers with AR experience
For a company that is accused of being behind on AI because it isn't publicly leveraging ChatGPT, Apple has had years incorporating Machine Learning -- and is again recruiting for more engineers in the field.
As spotted by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, the new ad is similar to recent ones.
This new Apple job listing is seeking those interested in "Conversational and Generative AI" and seems to imply there will be an on-device way to create AR/VR apps on the headset -- eventually. pic.twitter.com/RAPR7Txwxf
-- Mark Gurman (@markgurman)
The full job posting does go on to say that "you will have the opportunity to work on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to enhance and augment human learning experiences."
However, there is nothing in the description to imply that it will be possible to design and build AR apps on a future Apple headset. Apple still hasn't brought its Xcode development app from the Mac to even the iPad, for instance, despite years of rumors.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
If people make the point that Apple is 'behind' it is because they have no equivalent solution on the market to what some competitors have.
As far as machine learning goes, well most technology companies have been making use of that for years. They include Apple but this area is perhaps more quantifiable as Apple hasn't really made as much use of it as some competitors, and is completely absent from the modeling and hardware field for AI/ML.
AFAIK there is no Ascend/Pangu/Mindspore combo for example. Nothing to compete with Nvidia etc.
Generative AI isn't the be all and end all of everything though. Just a step more.
Apple could probably ignore it altogether but it looks like they want in to some degree because of these job listings.
Will a stronger focus on machine learning lead to better outcomes for technology like Maps and Siri? Absolutely yes. Is any of this actually independent machine intelligence? Absolutely not.
Nowadays academia and expert groups largely accept much wider and simplified definitions of AI.
We'll have to try and live with it.
This is a proposed definition from an EU Expert Group evaluation:
"Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are software (and possibly also hardware) systems designed by humans that, given a complex goal, act in the physical or digital dimension by perceiving their environment through data acquisition, interpreting the collected structured or unstructured data, reasoning on the knowledge, or processing the information, derived from this data and deciding the best action(s) to take to achieve the given goal. AI systems can either use symbolic rules or learn a numeric model, and they can also adapt their behaviour by analysing how the environment is affected by their previous actions.
PDF:
https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-12/ai-definition.pdf
that said, I could get all worked up about the corruption of the Acronym AI, but it doesn’t matter. The marketers won on that one.
I also find it incredibly hard to believe, given the fundamental problems of Siri, that Tim Apple hasn’t prioritised this kind of thing years ago. Either that is the case, replacing Siri was ignored and he is always and foremost about the supply chain and margins, or the community at large just isn’t aware of what Apple has been up to and all will eventually be revealed.