Apple wants to hire a PR heavyweight to battle the EU on its own soil

Posted:
in General Discussion edited April 11

Apple has been having no luck arguing against the EU's Digital Markets Act, and it's paid the price in fines and forced changes to its App Store -- so now it's looking for a European head of PR.

European Union flag flutters with a circle of twelve yellow stars and a central apple-shaped cutout against a blue sky.
Apple logo superimposed on a European Union flag



It perhaps says a lot about Apple's success in promoting itself across Europe that it's not been possible to confirm that the Head of Corporate PR role is actually new. Even in a famously secretive company, the issue of who runs PR shouldn't be a mystery.

And there have definitely been people in charge, they just don't appear to have had this particular title. Tanya Ridd, for instance, was reportedly Apple's head of PR for north and south Europe, which you'd think would just mean Europe.

She led Apple's PR in the EU for a decade, but left back in 2017 to join Snap. She stayed there for four years, before a brief spell at Spotify, and now she's with Polestar.

If Ridd doesn't like it at the EV maker for any reason, Apple could well be glad to see her back. For while it is currently advertising the job of head of corporate PR for Europe, it has been doing so since February 8, 2024.

And the truth is that Apple has also tried advertising it before -- at least once.

There's no way to know how many applicants it considered when advertising the role in January 2024, but apparently it wasn't enough.

It's also not possible to determine what the remuneration is, but the job ad does specify that the work is 35 hours per week. The successful applicant would work in London, but seemingly be a head who is on the same level of the organization as corporate PR managers in Paris and Berlin.

What Apple says is that the job is about "helping us inform the world about Apple and the values that drive our company."

"We develop and implement strategic plans to actively communicate Apple's contribution to Europe and wider society," it continues, "focused on key areas such as our economic contribution, education, customer privacy, and environmental leadership."

Apart from that last consideration regarding the environment, each of those key areas is one where Apple has failed to persuade the EU of its intentions. The EU has now used the Digital Markets Act to fine Apple around $2 billion because of perceived harm to consumers, for instance.

Apple is far from dominating streaming as the EU says it is, and the company has to have concluded that it simply isn't being heard. Or perhaps that Europe-based firm Spotify is being heard more, since Apple has made a point of noting how Spotify has met with EU regulators 65 times.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,315member
    In short a local Lobbyist lawyer that used to work at the EU? Ha Ha......

    On another note Beeper was bought out for 125 million dollars by Wordpress more power to the people yea right...
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 9
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,227member
    The EU will milk you one way or the other.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 9
    croprcropr Posts: 1,140member
    If one needs a PR heavyweight to influence the EU, he/she should be located in Brussels.  A person located in London won't be taken seriously by the EU commission and EU parliament.   This sounds like influencing the US government from Mexico City 
    nubusAlex1Navon b7watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 9
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,539member
    Maybe Apple should create a European subsidiary HQ’d in Paris that is responsible for creating the EU compliant iPhone and related services, and wall that off from the rest of the world. Have it be a totally European operation with employees in Cupertino spending very little time on it. 

    The EU group could use/modify apple hardware, software, and services to the extent that they can but otherwise do their own thing. Maybe the EU phone would always be based on an older version of iOS and running on hardware from two years ago.

    my rationale is to save apple employees in the US from wasting time on compliance— they need to be making great products for the rest of the world. Just accept that the EU compliance phone is going to kinda suck and stop worrying about it. 

    If Europeans are happy with the compliance phone, good for them. If not, remember that when voting.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 9
    I’m surprised that they waited this long to do that. I would have assumed that they would have done that years ago.
    avon b7watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,315member
    I’m surprised that they waited this long to do that. I would have assumed that they would have done that years ago.
    Most new Silicon Valley tech companies created in the last fifty years didn't think like the old line companies like AT&T, GM, or Shell Oil manynaively thought they didn't need to bribe the government to do its job..... Note: this new era of enlightenment by tech won't benefit the common people/customer being in the pigsty never does.
    dewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 9
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,043member
    Waste of money. A PR campaign won’t curtail a dictatorial government with no respect for the will of the people, business ethics, economic health, or common sense. 
    Afarstarwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    inklinginkling Posts: 774member
    Apple has been having no luck arguing against the EU's Digital Markets Act, and it's paid the price in fines and forced changes to its App Store — so now it's looking for a European head of PR.
    What Apple says is that the job is about "helping us inform the world about Apple and the values that drive our company."
    Apple would be better advised to quit seeing the problem as a matter of public relations and its company "values" and pay more attention to the values that drive Europe's economy.

    I find it more than a little bizarre that when is comes to China, a one-party dictatorship, Apple has no problem with setting aside its presumably democratic and rights-centric values, and yet when it comes to a democratic Europe Apple insists that Apple's values must reign supreme. Odd, really odd.

    I might add that, while I often disagree EU dictates, seeing them as paternalistic or dysfunctional, those are Europe's choices and the consequences are their own. Those differences are deeply rooted in the differing cultures of Europe and the U.S. The risk takers came here. The more cautious stayed there. Two centuries that still matters.
    edited April 11 muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 9
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,691member
    Apple should give some thought to trying to use “The Benjamin Franklin Effect” in the EU. Rather than being perpetually at odds with the EU regulators who are trying to micromanage Apple’s business they should seek out assistance within the EU about finding EU based partners that Apple can partner with on joint projects that will develop shared dependencies between Apple and one or more EU companies that the EU is trying to promote. 

    The EU needs to have skin in the game when it comes to who they decide to go after. They’re less likely to punish Apple for its success when doing so would hurt their own companies and have a direct negative impact on employment in the EU. 


    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.