Foxconn head predicts a surge in US manufacturing in the coming years

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in AAPL Investors

The CEO of Apple partner Foxconn has broken silence on President Trump's tariffs, and is predicting disruption and perhaps an expansion of US manufacturing by big tech in the coming years.

A Foxconn facility
A Foxconn facility



The remarks by Foxconn CEO Young Liu during an earnings call were uncharacteristic for the executive. When asked about the impact of tariffs, the executive didn't dance around the matter.

"The issue of tariffs is something that is giving the CEOs of our customers a big headache now. Judging by the attitude and the approach we see the US government taking towards tariffs, it is very, very hard to predict how things will develop over the next year," Liu said. "So we can only concentrate on doing well what we can control."

At the same time, Liu cautioned investors that manufacturing demand might be an issue, as ultimately tariff costs are passed onto the customers by importing companies. Apple will keep Foxconn revenues stable for at least a year, but the matter is complex and fluid.

"Under the uncertainties related to geopolitics and tariffs, manufacturing will face challenges and demand might also suffer," Liu added.

Beyond Apple, Liu didn't give any real context to the shift in manufacturing to the US. Briefly answering a question posed by an investment firm, Liu said that multiple customers were "one after another" working on plans to cooperate with Foxconn in the US. There were no details to share, as plans have not been finalized, and may not come to fruition.

Foxconn already has one expensive manufacturing boondoggle in the US. Under the first Trump administration, ground was broken in June 2018 after a round of massive financial incentives inspired Apple's partner to build a LCD factory in Wisconsin.

The facility remains mostly empty, after gutting acres of farmland and residential areas to break ground. In 2021, Foxconn signed a new contract, in which it promised to invest up to $672 million, and create 1,454 jobs by the year 2025 -- far more favorable terms for the manufacturer than the original deal signed in 2017.

It's not clear where that deal stands now, in March 2025. Foxconn signed a deal to produce server components for Google at the facility, but the vast majority of that work is still performed overseas.

Production for that deal has likely moved or will move to a new facility in Mexico. According to a report by The Financial Times on Friday morning, the company is building a facility there to build Nvidia Blackwell servers.

Overall, Foxconn reported a 13% year-over-year drop in net profit for the quarter, with an increase of operating profit by 32%. The drop was because of decrease in non-operating income.




Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    The only missing point in the discussion is… At what cost will products be produced?

    US companies relayed in China because there it was cheaper to produce.
    watto_cobraneoncat
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 8
    Remember when FoxCon was going to build a big, beautiful manufacturing plant in SE Wisconsin? Remember what actually happened? No manufacturing facility at all. It was all just a scam to please Trump 1.0. I wouldn’t hold my breath. 
    DAalsethdavenchasmmuthuk_vanalingamdanoxronnwatto_cobra
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 8
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,965member
    The sky’s the limit … for US manufacturers of industrial automation and process control hardware, software, systems, and services companies. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 8
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,719member
    dewme said:
    The sky’s the limit … for US manufacturers of industrial automation and process control hardware, software, systems, and services companies. 
    And for big price increases if more manufacturing is done in North America.

    There's a reason why US companies tend to keep the intellectual development and design of consumer products here, and outsource the manufacturing mostly overseas. It's to keep the cost of the products down, and the profit margins up. Changes in the cost of production is always, ALWAYS passed on to the domestic consumer (that is, you and me).

    I actually do, believe it or not, get what the president is TRYING to do with his tariff fever, but it's already backfiring and -- despite some lovely PR releases from companies waving the flag -- will only increase costs on North American consumers. The basic problem with his approach is that you can't just wish up more factories in the US over the course of a year or two -- it will take a couple of decades, and in the meantime YOU will be paying quite a bit for practically everything made outside the US.

    A plan to increase self-reliance on manufacturing will require a carefully-crafted program that is implemented and executed across the next few decades. The rewards will be long-term, not short term -- sadly this requires some short-term sacrifice, patience, and vision between all branches of federal, state, and local government that I don't see as possible anymore without a major societal sea change away from hyper-partisanization.
    Wesley Hilliardwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 8
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,652member
    mrbillv said:
    Remember when FoxCon was going to build a big, beautiful manufacturing plant in SE Wisconsin? Remember what actually happened? No manufacturing facility at all. It was all just a scam to please Trump 1.0. I wouldn’t hold my breath. 

     Foxconn is just kidding Psych! ….. Nothing will happen.
    neoncatwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 8
    If it’s anything like the auto industry back in the 1980s and 1990s when all the major foreign car makers from Toyota to BMW to Volkswagen opened plants in the USA, foreign companies will open factories here. It will still take years to get semiconductor foundries up and running so unless you know who flipflops based on promises of massive foreign investment (like the recent TSMC $100 billion offer). there will be higher prices down the road.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 8
    chasm said:
    dewme said:
    The sky’s the limit … for US manufacturers of industrial automation and process control hardware, software, systems, and services companies. 
    And for big price increases if more manufacturing is done in North America.

    There's a reason why US companies tend to keep the intellectual development and design of consumer products here, and outsource the manufacturing mostly overseas. It's to keep the cost of the products down, and the profit margins up. Changes in the cost of production is always, ALWAYS passed on to the domestic consumer (that is, you and me).

    I actually do, believe it or not, get what the president is TRYING to do with his tariff fever, but it's already backfiring and -- despite some lovely PR releases from companies waving the flag -- will only increase costs on North American consumers. The basic problem with his approach is that you can't just wish up more factories in the US over the course of a year or two -- it will take a couple of decades, and in the meantime YOU will be paying quite a bit for practically everything made outside the US.

    A plan to increase self-reliance on manufacturing will require a carefully-crafted program that is implemented and executed across the next few decades. The rewards will be long-term, not short term -- sadly this requires some short-term sacrifice, patience, and vision between all branches of federal, state, and local government that I don't see as possible anymore without a major societal sea change away from hyper-partisanization.
    I would just add these few things; the U.S. still lacks a sizable trained, experienced workforce for these kinds of products* (and companies have no real plan other than increased automation, as pointed out by others), let alone a workforce that’s used to doing surge work, then moving on when demand slackens (though not for lack of trying on the part of companies).

    * U.S. corps are largely responsible for their own predicament; companies routinely shit on these types of workers and the work is looked down on, and consumers rarely want to pay the ‘real’ cost of items (i.e. the externalized costs, like end-of-lifespan issues). Also, companies incurred enormous inefficiencies in transferring skilled work to an initially unskilled workforce during the ‘70s and ‘80s, estimated to have erased any real cost-savings. Look to Apple’s struggles in moving operations to India and elsewhere (some of which is also no-doubt due to infrastructure issues).
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 8

    If it’s anything like the auto industry back in the 1980s and 1990s when all the major foreign car makers from Toyota to BMW to Volkswagen opened plants in the USA, foreign companies will open factories here. It will still take years to get semiconductor foundries up and running so unless you know who flipflops based on promises of massive foreign investment (like the recent TSMC $100 billion offer). there will be higher prices down the road.
    You’re kind of on the right track, but missing a few details. The first companies here, like Toyota and Honda, had the advantages of a country that built infrastructure around building cars (delivery systems, parts suppliers, etc), and had a deeply skilled workforce tailor made for it, and gratuitous tax incentives. They still struggled. Even when NAFTA really juiced the whole system. So yeah, it’s gonna be a slog to create that environment. And everyone is conveniently overlooking the impact of climate change on all of this — which should have people realizing that all the rule books and past experiences are about to need re-evaluation. Especially as it’s dedicated institutions that carry out humanity’s truly long term projects, and we’re busy setting fire to them all, or selling them to the lowest bidders. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.