Every Intel Mac mini is now obsolete or vintage, and will be missed

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware

It's the end of an era as the much-loved 2018 Intel Mac mini has been added to Apple's list of vintage products. It's yet another step heralding the end of support of Intel on Mac.

Black square device with an apple logo on a desk, accompanied by a keyboard and small electronic devices in the background.
The 2018 Mac mini was the last to use an Intel processor, and it's now officially a vintage product



With some exceptions under international law, Apple has long had a specific process for when it deems devices to be first vintage, and then obsolete. What's significant now is that every Intel-based Mac mini has entered the vintage stage, the first time since the move from Intel to Apple Silicon back in 2020.

"Products are considered vintage when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 5 and less than 7 years ago," says Apple on its support page. "[And] obsolete when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 7 years ago."

The last Intel Mac mini



The last Mac mini to use an Intel processor was launched with extreme fanfare in 2018. Following the launch of a revised MacBook Air, Tim Cook started to say that "Now, there's another small but mighty Mac our users have been waiting for..."

It had been four years since the previous generation and the audience at Cook's presentation actually began to give a little roar of excitement as they guessed what was coming.

They guessed that it was a revised Mac mini, but they possibly didn't guess how it would follow Cook's "and here it comes." He looked around as if searching the skies, then a full-on "Close Encounters" video presented the device as a UFO coming through space to land on a user's desk.

After that, it was a slightly odd launch as Tom Boger, head of Mac product marketing, began a hyped-up presentation -- that began by raving about the New Mac mini's color. "I'm sure you've noticed that we've given it an awesome space gray finish," he said. "For one, we know our pro customers are going to love that."

But then he was into the details of what was described as "the biggest update ever," where "the performance boost is incredible." It won't seem that big a boost compared to the move to Apple Silicon, but at the time, this last Intel Mac mini was five times faster than its predecessor.



There was a 3.6GHz four-core Intel Core i3 version, configurable to 3.2GHz six-core editions with the Intel Core i5 or i7 processors.

It was also the first to have all-flash storage in every configuration. That storage started with 128GB SSD but could be upgraded at time of purchase to 2TB.

This last Mac mini could go up to 64GB RAM, compared to its predecessor's maximum of 16GB RAM. Plus, users could upgrade that RAM after purchase.

A return to form



That audience had reason to be excited, and not just because it had been four years since Apple last launched a Mac mini. For one thing, it had seemed as if Apple had abandoned the popular form, and enough so that Tim Cook responded publicly when asked about it.

Tim Cook responds to Mac mini criticism in 2017
Tim Cook responds to Mac mini criticism in 2017



But there was also the fact that the 2014 Mac mini had been poorly received. While it had certain updates and was returned to the model's former $499 price, it was for the most part slower and less flexible than its predecessor.

So this 2018 model coming out at all was big news. It coming out with a fanfare and a considerable performance boost was enough to get applause -- even with the price now starting at $799.

Applauded and now missed



There really was applause, even after that price announcement, and it was true that this was the best Mac mini ever. To that date.

Two years later in June 2020, Apple would even use the Mac mini form factor as its first Developer Transition Kit for Apple Silicon. Then later in 2020, it was the first Apple Silicon Mac mini to go on sale.

The two machines can't be very easily compared, but the Apple Silicon Mac mini was better than the 2018 Intel model in every way measurable. And not just by a little.

"The new Mac mini is far faster than the old Intel model. Unusually for Apple, it's also actually cheaper," we said at the time. "That combination, especially the extremely improved performance, is enough to show just why Apple has made the move to Apple Silicon."

Yet 2018 Intel Mac mini was such an improvement over its predecessor that its very existence earned it applause at the time, and fans to this day. And even though it is now vintage and eclipsed by its successors, it was still so good that it will be missed.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 16
    Not missed by me- the current Mac Minis are incredibly powerful and yet tiny with zero fan noise. 
    bloggerblogdanoxwilliamlondon
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 16
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,760member
    The thing I miss is an Intel that designed and manufactured the best chips in the world. After Andy Grove, Intel switched mottos from “only the paranoid survive” to “only the complacent maximize next quarter’s profit and the CEO bonus.” Those CEOs achieved their goal — they got rich by cashing in on previous generations’ investments without making investments of their own. 
    mark fearingDAalsethdanoxPenzidavenkellieFileMakerFeller
     6Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 16
    blastdoor said:
    The thing I miss is an Intel that designed and manufactured the best chips in the world. After Andy Grove, Intel switched mottos from “only the paranoid survive” to “only the complacent maximize next quarter’s profit and the CEO bonus.” Those CEOs achieved their goal — they got rich by cashing in on previous generations’ investments without making investments of their own. 
    well said. They decided they could focus on doing the same thing instead of moving forward. The future is not the past. This country needs to understand that as well.
    blastdoordanoxdavendewmekellie
     4Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 16
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,579member
    Intel drove a monopoly in home computer chips thanks to it and Microsoft, and so they got complacent. Apple obviously realized that and took action. I do not miss Intel not one bit and glad to see Apple grab the bull by the horns and slam it to the floor! 
    ravnorodomwilliamlondonrezwitsmacike
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 16
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,369member
    The og Mac mini was a revolution. 

    But I won’t miss it. The m4 baby cube version is what we always wished the mini could be. 
    Penzirezwits
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 16
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,684member
    Intel drove a monopoly in home computer chips thanks to it and Microsoft, and so they got complacent. Apple obviously realized that and took action. I do not miss Intel not one bit and glad to see Apple grab the bull by the horns and slam it to the floor! 

    First Motorola of Schaumburg, Illinois, then IBM, and finally Intel said no in succession, which in the end was a good thing because Apple had to go forward with certain key software /hardware technologies that couldn’t be done by outside companies, Apple learned the hard way that they needed to roll up their sleeves build those so-called Mac trucks because they weren’t going to get any help from other tech companies like Nvidia, AMD or Intel their paths simply weren’t the same….
    edited April 16
    dewmeneoncatmacike
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 16
    Penzipenzi Posts: 40member
    I had earlier Mac minis and then the atrocious dual core version of 2014 spiked them for me until Apple Silicon versions were released. I picked up a fully loaded M1 mini but unfortunately it was insufficiently powerful for my wants and needs, so it was replaced with a mildly less than fully loaded M1Max MBPro. That has served me well indeed (the Pro chips are probably sufficient to my needs… but not my wants/longevity). Now that Macs have Thunderbolt 5 I await the release of monitors taking advantage of the bandwidth and will then plunge headlong back into desktops.

    Long way to say that I will not miss the Intel Mac mini…  ;)
    surgefiltermacike
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 16
    davendaven Posts: 753member
    I still have my Intel mini but have not turned it on in maybe a year. I replaced my Intel iMac with an Apple Silicon iMac and haven’t looked back.
    williamlondonrjb2112
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 16
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,161member
    Intel deservedly deserved the boot.  I won't miss Intel on Macs.   What I will do is continue to keep my 2018 Mac Mini for the long, foreseeable future for those rare times I need to run x86 Windows natively.  That's it.  Other than that, it's Apple Silicon to the rescue!
    programmerwilliamlondon
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 16
    Xedxed Posts: 3,114member
    sflocal said:
    Intel deservedly deserved the boot.  I won't miss Intel on Macs.   What I will do is continue to keep my 2018 Mac Mini for the long, foreseeable future for those rare times I need to run x86 Windows natively.  That's it.  Other than that, it's Apple Silicon to the rescue!
    Mine is from late 2018 (Macmini8,1) and it’s still going strong. I’ll probably keep it around for several more years as a headless Mac.

    I’ve upgraded it to 64 GiB. This is the model that brought back user-upgradable RAM, which I think was for that one revision until the M1 came out in 2020. Admittedly my 64 GiB is excessive but the price compared to 32 GiB at the time wasn’t much different so I just went for it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 16
    programmerprogrammer Posts: 3,499member
    sflocal said:
    Intel deservedly deserved the boot.  I won't miss Intel on Macs.   What I will do is continue to keep my 2018 Mac Mini for the long, foreseeable future for those rare times I need to run x86 Windows natively.  That's it.  Other than that, it's Apple Silicon to the rescue!
    Same here.  My M4Pro mini absolutely wipes the floor with the old Intel one.  The latter is now relegated to a Windows game machine, and that’s it.  Even Mac x86 games run better on the M4.
    surgefilter
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 16
    Glad to see the back of Intel Mac Minis.  Many’s a day I spent trying to fix those d4mn things for the people who had bought them,  A total ‘mare, more often than not.  They were no MacPro 5,1. Good riddance!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 16
    welshdogwelshdog Posts: 1,924member
    My 2012 Mini with two internal SSDs is still running 24/7 recording security cameras, backing up photos from iCloud and running my home automation. One drive is for Time Machine backups of two Macbook Airs. I want a new Mini to run improved security recording software and will probably keep the old one for the Time Machine backups. The 2012 Mini has been one of the best Macs I've had. I'l put it up there with my IIci and my beloved 12" Aluminum  Powerbook G4.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 16
    SiTimesitime Posts: 44member
    I very much miss my MacBook Air 11-inch. For the time, it was a great machine in a tiny form factor. I wish I didn’t sell it all those years ago. Obviously that device is far outclassed in terms… basically everything… nowadays, but I do miss having such a tiny MacBook that I could toss in a similarly-tiny bag and bring with me everywhere. Not that the current 13-inch MacBooks are unwieldy behemoths (13-inch is, of course, fine for portability). But 11-inch is a fantastic size for portability while still being completely-useable.

    I wonder… how much would it cost me to buy a good or excellent condition MacBook Air 11-inch (the final model that Apple made)? Wikipedia indicates that the last one was in March 2015. Seems it officially supports up to Monterey and seemingly it is still getting security patches (If I understand correctly the chart on the Wikipedia MacBook Air article page). 
    edited April 17
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 16
    boboliciousbobolicious Posts: 1,192member
    To me the eGPU capability has been a bonus being easily upgradable and is it still with an RX 6950XT comparable to an M3 Ultra GPU...?


    That along with 32 bit app capability running Mojave / Vega 56 can it offer iMac Pro like legacy digital asset access and easy virtualization of Windows for those that need it...?

    I also still have a 2010 i7 mini maxed out with the dual drive bays and discrete GPU, a favourite design for its upgradability...

    edited April 17
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 16
    rezwitsrezwits Posts: 916member
    Mine with a Sonnet eGPU Puck is sill running 6 1080 Monitors on a Hex Mount pretty good for Music, Plex, a YouTube Window, and NFL ticket... plus an email window/messages and/or a browser...  Guess this Sequoia Half OS is the last one it's gonna get, figured that tho...

    Laters...
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.