Trump vs. China: How the tariff war has hit Apple so far

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPhone edited April 16

The battle between President Donald Trump and China over import tariffs has impacted Apple, and will hit consumer wallets soon. Here's everything you need to know about it, current through April 16, 2025.

A man in a suit holds an open folder with text on one side and an upward graph with an Apple logo on the other, against a red background.
Apple's stock has been hit hard by the Trump tariff battle with China



President Donald Trump's first presidency was known for many things, but one of the biggest events in it was the U.S.-China trade war. The financial event saw the U.S. apply high tariffs against Chinese imports, impacting the cost of produce entering the country.

The incident caused issues for many businesses, but Apple managed to steer clear of the effects. This was chiefly down to the positive relationship CEO Tim Cook had with Donald Trump at the time.

With Trump now in a second term in office, import tariffs have become an issue once again. This time, it's a bigger problem that's affecting markets around the world.

And, it will soon impact consumer prices as exporting countries don't pay tariffs -- importing companies do. Those companies typically pass increased costs for any reason to the consumer, and tariffs certainly count as increased costs.

While it escaped being hit last time, Apple has been caught up by the tariff battle, and not just by hits to its share price. As the tariff battle shifts to beyond tariff hikes, Apple faces even more financial challenges on the horizon.

This is what has happened in the Trump tariff fight so far.

November 11, 2024: Trump's tariffs could raise prices



Ahead of Trump's second term, the President-Elect was extremely keen to apply tariffs on imports on goods around the world. The goal was part of a continued push to bring manufacturing to the United States, instead of relying on foreign production.

Two men in suits sit beside each other at a conference table, one appears pensive, and the other is speaking.
Tim Cook and Donald Trump in a meeting at the White House in 2018



In a 22-page report, the Consumer Technology Association explained how the tariffs could impact the world. While most countries would get 10% or 20% tariff bands, China was expected to get a 60% tariff.

The report warned that there would be "unintended consequences," including a deteriorated reputation for the U.S., a downgraded credit rating, and more trade restrictions.

However, Apple was in a somewhat stronger position than last time, as it had set up some bases of manufacturing outside of China. With supply chain sections in India and other countries, it was thought Apple could produce iPhones destined for the U.S. there and deal with a lower tariff, leaving China-produced iPhones for the rest of the world.

January 27, 2025: Trump's chip tariff threat takes aim at Apple's TSMC partnership



In a speech at an Issues conference at the Trump National Doral Resort in Miami, Florida, Trump talked at length about tariffs. Aside from tariffs on vehicles imported from Mexico, Trump added that there would be others placed on foreign-produced computer chips and semiconductors.

Reiterating a need to return production to the United States, Trump mentioned Taiwan's holding of about 90% of the chip business, in reference to Apple chip partner TSMC.

Believing TSMC already has billions and doesn't need financial incentives like the Chips Act, Trump instead offered that not having to pay tax was incentive enough.

"They will build a factory with their own money," Trump insisted. "They will come in because it's good for them."

February 5, 2025: China threatens App Store probe in trade tensions retaliations



With the prospect of tariffs on the horizon, China was reportedly considering an antitrust investigation into Apple's App Store.

Part of potential retaliatory measures, a report claimed that the App Store's fees and practices could be targeted by the investigation. China's State Administration for Market Regulation would perform the probe into Apple's policies and its 30% commission on purchases, as well as third-party payments and app storefronts.

On May 2024, China had concluded a previous investigation into the App Store, and deemed that Apple did not abuse its market position.

February 20, 2025: Cook meets with Trump at the White House



Apple CEO Tim Cook met with Trump on February 20, in a visit that probably discussed the import tariff situation and U.S. manufacturing.

FOX Business Cameras caught Apple CEO Tim Cook on asking into the White House about 10 minutes ago. #Apple #WhiteHouse pic.twitter.com/CONgQhI3bG

-- Edward Lawrence (@EdwardLawrence)



Spotted on his way into the White House for a little after 10 AM Eastern Time, he left about 45 minutes later. Though details of the meeting were not disclosed at the time, Cook insisted he had a "great meeting" with the President.

February 20, 2025: iPhone prices could rise 10% under Trump tariffs



In a February 20 report, Bank of America analysts estimated that, whatever Apple does to spread manufacturing outside of China, it will face a minimum 10% tariff.

Apple could feasibly absorb the cost in the short term, which would cost Apple a loss of 26 cents in earnings per share. The equivalent of a 3% drop across the 2026 calendar year.

Rising prices by 3% to partially offset costs would mean a 2.4% slide and a per-share earnings drop of 21 cents. If Apple passed the increased cost onto buyers and sales decrease in tandem, BoA forecasted Apple would have to raise prices by 9%.

March 14, 2025: Foxconn chief predicts U.S. manufacturing surge



Commenting on the threat of tariffs, Apple assembly partner Foxconn CEO Young Liu confirmed the subject was an issue for its clients in March. The attitude and approach from the U.S. on tariffs made predictions for the following year harder to make, he added.

Workers in white uniforms assemble electronics at a factory workstation with boxes labeled Foxconn.
Foxconn is an Apple supply chain member, but mostly operates in China. - Image Credit: Foxconn



Liu warned that geopolitics and tariffs will introduce challenges to manufacturers, which could include a drop in demand.

Answering a question from an investment firm, Liu said that multiple clients were working with Foxconn on plans in the U.S. They were, however, just talks, and Apple wasn't directly mentioned either.

April 2, 2025: Liberation Day



Styled by Trump as "Liberation Day," the President laid out tariffs against almost every country. The "reciprocal tariffs" on imports would range from 10% to 49%, with the figure varying by country.

The Administration claimed the figures were determined by cutting the existing tariffs on the U.S. from the countries, and applying them back at half the rate. Instead, the figures were seemingly generated by dividing the trade deficit by imports to determine the "tariffs on America."

That percentage is halved to create the reciprocal tariffs.

Man in a suit holds an open folder with a signed document, speaking with an American flag in the background.
Donald Trump started the Tariff War with China.



Not missing a branding opportunity, Trump called the Rose Garden event "Make America Wealthy Again."

For Apple, the big issue is China, which had an import tariff of 34%. With 80% of Apple's production capacity and 90% of iPhones made there, it could hurt Apple heavily.

India had a tariff applied to it of 26%, but Vietnam was hit with a 46% tariff. At least with India's low tariff, it appeared that Apple could import U.S. iPhones from that country to minimize costs.

April 4, 2025: Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs



Not to leave the U.S. tariff announcement unanswered, China announced its own tariffs on the United States. As the U.S. levied a total of 54% in tariffs on China, including the new 34% reciprocal version, China applied a 34% tariff on U.S. imports into China.

Trump insisted that China "panicked" and that it was the "one thing they cannot afford to do" on Truth Social. While golfing, Trump told reporters that it was like operating on a patient, and that the U.S. is "going to boom."

Meanwhile, the stock market didn't take the announcement in its stride. As of noon on April 4, AAPL was trading at $195.63, down from the high of $225.19 before the announcement.

April 4, 2025: iPhone 17 Pro predicted to cost over $2,000



For consumers, the tariff was believed to hit the iPhone price very hard. Rosenblatt Securities forecasted on April 4 that there would be massive price rises on Apple's products. A 43% iPhone price rise would increase the base model iPhone 16 to over $1,140, while the 1TB iPhone 16 Pro Max would go up to almost $2,300.

Other analysts were a little more level-headed, such as Counterpoint Research's 30% increase forecast, and CFRA Research's 10% figure for the moment but higher levels for the iPhone 17.

Rosenblatt added that the cost will largely come down to where the iPhone is made, due to lower tariffs for India versus China. Ultimately, the tariffs as imposed could've cost Apple up to $40 billion, though according to Morgan Stanley, it would be more in the range of $33 billion.

April 7, 2025: Customers panic-buy iPhones under threat of price rises, while Apple increases its stockpile



The possibility of Apple handing down the cost of high import tariffs to consumers apparently scared some on-the-fence iPhone buyers into pulling the trigger. An April 7 report insisted that U.S. Apple Stores were as busy as they were during holiday seasons.

Higher sales were experienced over the weekend, as consumers expected major price increases. Employees were often asked about increases in iPhone pricing, but they had not been given any corporate guidance on the subject.

To try and counter the tariffs before they're implemented, Apple reportedly spent some days in the last week of March shipping more products to the United States. Over three days, five flights were used to transport Apple products from China and India to the United States.

As for the U.S. warehouses, they apparently had enough stock for several months anyway.

April 7, 2025: Apple stocks plummet under 104% tariff threat



Following China's rebuttal of a 34% tariff on U.S. imports into the country, Donald Trump fought back. After applying an additional 50% on top of the existing 34% reciprocal tariff, he threatened on April 7 to increase the tariff to 104% on Chinese imports.

In effect, this would double the cost of every component or device it imports from China.

Smartwatch displaying Apple Inc. stock graph and details: 181.46, down 47.09 (20.60%), market closed.
AAPL stock changes over the month before the tariff war heated up



By midday, AAPL was down another 5.3% as part of another volatile trading day. By the end of trading, Apple's stock ended at $181.46, down $6.92 from the previous Friday's close.

It was a situation felt elsewhere in the stockmarket too. The S&P 500 briefly entered a bear market status, while U.S. stocks in general dropped about 20%.

April 9, 2025: Apple braces for another share battering as China, EU fight back



After Tuesday's heavy day on the markets and Trump's new tariff, Apple had to deal with further escalations. From China, the 34% tariff on U.S. imports became 50% higher, at 84% on April 9.

It was expected that China's move would inevitably get another response from Trump.

However, the European Union also stepped in with its own retaliatory tariffs. Referring to the U.S. tariffs as "unjustified and damaging," the EU said it will be applying its own from April 15 in a first grouping, with second from May 15.

The level of the EU tariffs were not disclosed at the time. However, the EU signaled positively that it was open to negotiations.

April 9, 2025: Trump hikes tariff to 125%, pauses others for 90 days



In a bit of mixed news, April 9 saw Trump announce that he would be implementing a 90-day pause on new tariffs against most countries the U.S. deals with. During the period, the reciprocal tariff would go down to 10%.

The pause was apparently to give the Trump Administration time to make deals with more than 75 countries claimed to have attempted to negotiate with the U.S. over tariffs.

The big exception is China. Instead, the tariffs against China were jacked up to 125% due to the country's "lack of respect," Trump claimed.

The announcement was a positive thing for Apple, despite the China tariff change. Shortly after, the Dow surged 2,000 points, and Apple's stock bumped up 11.28%.

April 9, 2025: An AAPL recovery of sorts



For April 9, Apple saw its stock go from the previous day's close of $172.87 to around $169 in pre-market trading, then started the day at $172.18.

White apple logo on a dark green background with a fluctuating stock market graph.
Amid a longer period where it was battered, AAPL did occasionally recover.



While markets braced for more turmoil, the stock level started to hover around $178 before Trump's 90-day pause announcement. Immediately after, the Nasdaq jumped 7% and the Dow surged 2,000 points again.

Apple closed at $198.85, up 15.3% on the previous day's closing. At the same time, its market capitalization returned to $2.99 trillion, almost to its former $3 trillion level.

April 9, 2025: Trump blinks, suggests Apple could get some relief



After the markets closed on April 9, Trump made a comment that had the potential to fix Apple's situation. Speaking to the press, Trump suggested that some companies may be considered for an exemption from tariffs.

Companies "hit harder" by tariffs would be considered, but the decision would be based on "instinct," Trump added.

April 10: Apple crumbles as White House clarifies 145% tariff rate



It was good while it lasted

Following April 9th's positive end to trading, the markets continued a downward trajectory, with AAPL's price down to $189.06 in early trading, before shooting back up to $194.78 within an hour.

However, by the end of April 10, Apple's shares were down 4.24% from the start of the day at $190.42. Its lowest point was at midday with $183.

Part of the problem was the tariff level against China. While Trump declared a 125% tariff, it turned out to be 145% in total.

Investors were also concerned about the 90-day pause, with fears that Trump's continued attacks on China would potentially slow down economic activity anyway.

April 11, 2025: China strikes back with 125%



On April 11, China continued the tit-for-tat tariffs with the U.S., increasing the tariffs on all U.S. goods by another 41%. This made the total tariff against U.S. goods 125%.

However, China also said it had no interest in raising tariffs again. Instead, if the U.S. continued, the Ministry of Commerce said it would enact its own countermeasures.

China didn't say what these countermeasures would be at the time, but limiting the transportation of goods would be one effective method at its disposal.

China insisted it was open for negotiation, but threats and pressure weren't the right way to deal with the country. Trump, meanwhile, claims he's waiting for a call from Beijing.

April 11, 2025: Apple stock rebounds again



Following the return to a slump on April 10, Apple saw premarket movements going downward to $186.10 on April 11. On opening, it rapidly climbed to $199.54 and ended the session at $198.15.

Elsewhere, the markets saw gains, including the Dow going up 619 points.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump was "optimistic" that the U.S. and China could strike a tariff deal, and that he was "open to a deal with China."

April 11, 2025: Trump gives Apple a giant break with wide-ranging tariff exemptions



In a surprise announcement extremely late on April 11, President Trump issued exemptions on reciprocal tariffs, affecting smartphones, computers, and chips.

Three men closely examine a large circuit board in an industrial setting, one wearing glasses, another in a suit with a red tie.
Donald Trump with Tim Cook at a Mac Prio factory during his first presidential term



The move effectively spared Apple and other tech companies from potentially billions in import fees. It applies across almost al of Apple's product line, though accessories like leather goods and Apple Watch bands didn't get a reprieve and would face tariffs.

April 13, 2025: iPhone & Mac tariff reprieve only temporary



Clarifications were made on April 13 over Trump's tariff reprieve. The exemptions would only be temporary, as other tariffs are on the way.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explained that a future "semiconductor tariff" would be applied instead. As for when that would be, Lutnick said "in a month or two."

The aim of the tariff was to try and encourage component makers to set up facilities in the United States. Lutnick insisted that the U.S. shouldn't be reliant on Southeast Asia for its electronics.

The level of the inbound semiconductor tariff was not advised at the time.

April 14, 2025: China escalates US tariff war by halting rare earth mineral exports



China kept its word that its response to the U.S. tariffs would not be more tariffs on its side. Instead, it's going to make it harder to produce hardware.

In an April 14 report, it was confirmed China placed a series of rare earth minerals and magnets on an export control list since April 4. The move requires an application to the Ministry of Commerce for a license to export a list of seven rare earth minerals out of the country.

The minerals and magnets are chiefly used in the production of components in a few industries, including energy, automotive, defense, and tech products.

The problem for manufacturers like Apple is that the opaque process can take a lot of time to complete, with estimates being between six weeks and a few months before a license is granted.

In the meantime, manufacturers in supply chains around the world that rely on those minerals will have to manage with whatever stockpiles they have at the moment.

As China occupies around 90% of the market for the minerals, that leaves only a very small number of other sources for the manufacturing materials, which could lead to intense competition to secure supplies.

April 14, 2025: Trump confirms he reduced tariffs to help Tim Cook



Speaking to reporters while officially meeting with El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, President Donald Trump effectively admitted that he changed the tariffs after speaking to Tim Cook.

Telling reporters he was flexible on April 14, Trump likened the China tariff battle to a wall, and that "sometimes you have to go around it, under it, or above it." He then uttered "There'll be maybe things coming up... I speak to Tim Cook."

"I helped Tim Cook recently," Trump said more definitively. "And that whole business. I don't want to hurt anybody."

April 15, 2025: US launches semiconductor probe to explain away tariff exemptions



Following the confirmation that semiconductor tariffs will be on the way and a separate tariff "bucket" than the headline one against China, the White House decided to try and justify the exemptions and inbound tariff changes.

In a document in the Federal Register readable on April 15 ahead of its official April 16 publication, the White House claimed the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to "determine the effects on national security of imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products."

It is unclear why the investigation apparently started on April 1 but was announced on April 15, and not officially enacted until April 16. There's also the oddity of the investigation starting long before the introduction of "reciprocal tariffs" and it only being announced after Apple benefited from the semiconductor exemption.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,579member
    We're witnessing the beginnings of the fall of the US empire.
    gatorguyqwerty52randominternetpersonglnframanpfaffsinophiliatyler82AulaniMisterKitquakerotis
     11Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 17
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 383member

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best company in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    sconosciutoglnfAulanidaven
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 17
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best COUNTRIES in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Fixed it for you. But companies also works.

    Trump will get his wish to go down in history. One of the most impactful humans ever. 
    qwerty52glnfmuthuk_vanalingamtyler82chasm
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 17
    Xedxed Posts: 3,114member
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best company in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Apple — as well as every other company that does business in the US and every American — is being hurt by these unqualified people in positions  because they were appointed by other unqualified people, but trust me when I say that Apple will be fine. They can weather this storm or if things get really bad (e.g. Germany circa 1940), Apple make their HQ a different city in a different country. I doubt the latter will come to that but I also didn’t expect for so many people to vote against their self interests and then contort themselves defending their decision with comments like, “I’d be proud to pay $5000 for an iPhone.”
    qwerty52glnfmuthuk_vanalingamsinophiliatyler82Aulani
     6Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 17
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 383member
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best COUNTRIES in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Fixed it for you. But companies also works.

    Trump will get his wish to go down in history. One of the most impactful humans ever. 
    Yes, I agree. But the question is: For good or bad ?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 17
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 383member
    Xed said:
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best company in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Apple — as well as every other company that does business in the US and every American — is being hurt by these unqualified people in positions  because they were appointed by other unqualified people, but trust me when I say that Apple will be fine. They can weather this storm or if things get really bad (e.g. Germany circa 1940), Apple make their HQ a different city in a different country. I doubt the latter will come to that but I also didn’t expect for so many people to vote against their self interests and then contort themselves defending their decision with comments like, “I’d be proud to pay $5000 for an iPhone.”
    I hope you are right. I will be very very happy to see that this uncertain times for Apple are over. 
    edited April 16
    radarthekat
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 17
    tmaywilliamlondon
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 17
    It's not going to end well for the USA. I think Tim Apple should have given more money. All I know is I've gone back to work after three years of retirement.
    williamlondonnubus
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 17
    radarthekatradarthekat Posts: 3,938moderator
    qwerty52 said:
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best COUNTRIES in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Fixed it for you. But companies also works.

    Trump will get his wish to go down in history. One of the most impactful humans ever. 
    Yes, I agree. But the question is: For good or bad ?
    Is that really in question?  
    Xedqwerty52Aulani
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 17
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 383member
    qwerty52 said:
    qwerty52 said:

    After all, it is tragic that this guy is doing his best to destroy one of the best COUNTRIES in the world, and it is a disaster that he even dosn't get it of what he is doing.

    Fixed it for you. But companies also works.

    Trump will get his wish to go down in history. One of the most impactful humans ever. 
    Yes, I agree. But the question is: For good or bad ?
    Is that really in question?  

    It was a rhetorical question,  because  randominternetperson's post did left some room for doubt ;-)
    I was just looking for conformation of what I thought.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 17
    tyler82tyler82 Posts: 1,116member
    You think prices are inflated now, wait until he bullies out Jerome Powell and puts in a Fox News host to run the reserve.
    edited April 17
    qwerty52
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 17
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,724member
    qwerty52 said:
    Trump will get his wish to go down in history. One of the most impactful humans ever. 
    Yes, I agree. But the question is: For good or bad ?
    I'd say along the lines of how Stalin is remembered.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 17
    Anyone else just sick of seeing this clown’s face? I sure am.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 17
    red oakred oak Posts: 1,110member
    Excellent summary 

    Even if you agree with the end goals,  the communications and execution of this tariff effort has been a complete sh*tshow.   The Admin better start signing great trade deals fast (eg.  IndIa, Taiwan, Japan, etc...) to re-gain momentum or this is going to a disaster.

    And, Tim Cook bears major responsibility for backing Apple into a Chinese corner.   Why has he not at least tried to bring more manufacturing to the US?   Either final assembly using state of the art automation,  or pushing harder for parts vendors to do more manufacturing here?      The writing has been on the wall for 10+ years .  Your sitting on $150 billion in cash for fuckin* sake 
    daven
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 17
    red oak said:
    Excellent summary 

    Even if you agree with the end goals,  the communications and execution of this tariff effort has been a complete sh*tshow.   The Admin better start signing great trade deals fast (eg.  IndIa, Taiwan, Japan, etc...) to re-gain momentum or this is going to a disaster.

    And, Tim Cook bears major responsibility for backing Apple into a Chinese corner.   Why has he not at least tried to bring more manufacturing to the US?   Either final assembly using state of the art automation,  or pushing harder for parts vendors to do more manufacturing here?      The writing has been on the wall for 10+ years .  Your sitting on $150 billion in cash for fuckin* sake 
    It's already a disaster. If the administration manages to sign some "great trade deals" they might just avoid the blame and/or the ire of the citizenry.

    As for Tim's direction of Apple... none of this is happening in isolation. For efficiency of manufacture, you want all the components to be manufactured within a reasonable geographic distance of your assembly point (otherwise you're holding excess inventory to reduce the risks and costs of shipment) - this means that any labour cost differential is magnified across all of the components and subcomponents that go into the final product. Even if wages in the US were "only" double those in China, that's a big impact: market forces are such that actively seeking to pay more than double the cost for the same product will see any management team suffer dire consequences. That's why the manufacturing moved overseas in the first place; the cost savings were significant and management teams and investors got rewarded for cost reduction.

    There are also arguments made about workforce availability, housing, transport and the sheer volume and variety of components. Apple is not the sole customer for most of the component manufacturers, and while it is an important enough customer to demand great pricing I doubt it has enough sway to demand the location of manufacture (unless it pays substantially more, which as stated above is a self-damaging move).

    The way I see it, either the US workforce needs to accept a massive reduction in compensation, the US companies need to accept a massive increase in costs, or the manufacturing jobs remain where they are. Any change to the status quo will need to happen over a long-term timeframe so that the current shortcomings in US capabilities can be addressed.
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 17
    davendaven Posts: 753member
    I expected the second Rump administration to be bad but I didn’t think it would be this bad!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 17
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,551member
    daven said:
    I expected the second Rump administration to be bad but I didn’t think it would be this bad!
    "...this bad!" doesn't begin to describe the depth and breadth of the damage done by this idiot savant. His only real skill is in fucking people and now countries, over. He's not through. He's right. It will get worse before getting better, if he has anything to say about it. "Getting better" is relative and won't happen until some time after he's no longer President Tariff. 

    But credit where credit is due



    At least he's holding it right. 
    edited April 22
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.