Trade war escalations between Trump and China to significantly impact Apple

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited April 21

Apple could be severely affected as Trump reportedly pressures countries to limit their business dealings with China, which will result in more retaliations against US companies.

Two men in suits sitting at a table, one adjusting glasses, the other speaking into a microphone, with a flag in the background.
Tim Cook and Donal Trump in 2019 -- image credit: White House



China previously called Trump's trade war a joke and said it would not retaliate further than matching what was then said to be a 125% tariff imposed by the US. That tariff was then revealed to actually be 145%, and China did not escalate its own tariffs -- although it did halt rare earth mineral exports.

Now, however, CNBC reports that China has responded to what appears to be Trump's next move. While not announced by Trump or any other country involved, it is believed that isolating China is a key part of the White House's tariff negotiations worldwide.

"China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of China's interests," a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said, in translation. "If this happens, China will not accept it and will resolutely take reciprocal countermeasures."

In a press release from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, the spokesperson went further and, again in translation, accused the US of having "coerced all parties to start so-called 'reciprocal tariff' negotiations."

"China believes that all parties should stand on the side of fairness and justice on the issue of 'reciprocal tariffs'," continued the spokesperson, "stand on the side of historical correctness, and defend international economic and trade rules and multilateral trading system."

In recent days, Trump has claimed to be in discussions with China and according to C-SPAN, says he expects an agreement to be reached "over the next three or four weeks."

According to Politico, no such discussions have taken place, even though China might allow its new international trade representative to negotiate. It's reportedly because Trump insists on dealing only with China's President Xi Jinping.

What this means for Apple



Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the risks for Apple are severe. Countries could impose their own tariffs on components sent to them from China, for example.

This CNBC report may suggest that tariff risks for Apple could escalate significantly, making the entire situation highly unpredictable.

1. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce's official statement, as reported by CNBC, indicates that the U.S. government's plan to use tariff

-- (Ming-Chi Kuo) (@mingchikuo)



Kuo's tweet continues by noting that "if only the US imposes high tariffs on Chinese imports, the risks [for Apple] are manageable."

"However, if other countries also raise tariffs on Chinese goods," he says, "Apple would need to establish more non-China iPhone production lines to meet demand in markets beyond the U.S., meaning the tariff risks for Apple would become immeasurable and entirely uncontrollable."

What happens next



Currently Apple is benefiting from an exemption to the China tariffs, although Trump repeatedly denies that there are any exemptions. At the same time, Trump also paused all tariffs -- except for those on China.

Three men in a factory inspect a large circuit board; one points at it, another wears a red tie, with shelves and lights in the background.
Tim Cook was able to get Apple a tariff exemption because he's kept up a working relationship with Trump (right)



Apple is likely to face further tariffs after the conclusion of a spurious investigation into any national security concerns with semiconductor production. Trump says Apple has not been given what he calls "exception," but rather it belongs in a different "bucket' of tariffs.

That bucket is one concerning semiconductors, but White House documentation backdates the investigation to before Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs were announced. It's not clear why Apple or other firms were then put into the presumably general "bucket" of tariffs.

It is clear, though, that the investigation will be followed by tariffs. While the documentation invites submissions by interested parties and purports that it will only impose tariffs if there are national security concerns, it is now certain to impose them.

That's because commerce secretary Howard Lutnick has already said on April 15 that semiconductor tariffs are "coming in probably a month or two." Trump, at the same time, said they would be imposed "next week."

Despite Tim Cook having reportedly persuaded Trump to exempt Apple from the tariffs, it has also been confirmed that the relief is only temporary. Apple was granted its exemption late on Friday, April 9, and shares rose from $198.15 to $211.44 when trading opened the following Monday.

That's still far below the $225.19 they were trading at before the "reciprocal" tariffs were announced. And at time of writing, they are down yet again, to $190.90.



Read on AppleInsider

bloggerblogzebra
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 24
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,579member
    I don't think Trump knows how to put 'America First', he's creating more enemies than friends.
    iOS_Guy80ramanpfaffpulseimagesFileMakerFellerzebradewmenapoleon_phoneapartAfarstarglnfradarthekat
     11Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 24
    It is in the interest of the whole world to keep iPhone prices down for all big businesses to buy them.
    Countries would be ill advised to apply tariffs on iPhones or parts as it would be harmful to their citizens and businesses.
    Not to mention that China would retaliate against them possibly in a worse manner than the US.

    Have faith in Apple management.

    Time will tell.
    iOS_Guy80napoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2radarthekat
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 24
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,387member
    Trump's Folly continues. It would be funny to watch the stupidity play out if this wasn't affecting real people's lives. We can only hope that the fever the President is inducing will ultimately help us flush out the Trumpian virus before it kills the rest of us. 

    Despite the naive confidence expressed by certain apologists here (and elsewhere), Apple is not going to be "fine," nor will the rest of us. Let us hope the unavoidable reality of these self-inflicted wounds will jolt enough people into demanding accountability, and cause members of Congress to be more fearful of the repercussions of continued inaction than they currently are of doing anything at all now to reassert their constitutional authority to stop this lunacy.
    muthuk_vanalingamiOS_Guy80ramanpfafftiredskillsDAalsethfolk fountainpulseimagesFileMakerFellerdewmenapoleon_phoneapart
     13Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 24
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,387member
    It is in the interest of the whole world to keep iPhone prices down for all big businesses to buy them.
    Countries would be ill advised to apply tariffs on iPhones or parts as it would be harmful to their citizens and businesses.
    Not to mention that China would retaliate against them possibly in a worse manner than the US.

    Have faith in Apple management.

    Time will tell.
    Apple management will do what they can, but Apple does not exist in a vacuum. Even if they were entirely spared of any direct tariff anywhere, the economic chaos that affects everything else will ultimately slow their sales and disrupt their supply chains. People who can't afford or can't even find basic necessities are not going to be queuing up en masse at the Apple Store to buy the latest iPhone. 
    muthuk_vanalingamjibiOS_Guy80DAalsethpulseimagesFileMakerFellernapoleon_phoneapartglnfradarthekat
     8Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 24
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 8,224member
    The current US administration seems to have put itself into geopolitical quicksand and the more it moves, the deeper it sinks.

    Trying to force sovereign nations to take sides will not work. Especially if the only deal is 'side with us. We can be trusted'. 

    The world is trying to widen its options, not reduce them. China has time on its side. The US doesn't. 

    I don't know if there are or aren't any talks (at whatever level) going on behind the scenes but it's a little premature to imagine anything substantial from the Chinese side. There is still a lot they can gain by holding back and not coming to the table and they know that trade is simply one arm of US goals. There is another that wants to stifle Chinese technological and geopolitical influence, neither of which can be dealt with now. That ship sailed years ago. 

    Time is ticking down on those 90 days and time has a tendency to fly. 
    gatorguymuthuk_vanalingamiOS_Guy80pulseimagesnapoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2glnfradarthekat
     7Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 24

    Whilst the short term ups and downs of the stock market can be ignored, the bond markets and dollar depreciation cannot, unless the USA wants higher borrowing and imports costs (above the tariff increases) and a risk of loosing reserve currency status. 

    Lowering interest rates and tax cuts would make this all far worse.

    nubus9secondkox2realjustinlong
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 24
    1348513485 Posts: 395member

    Whilst the short term ups and downs of the stock market can be ignored, the bond markets and dollar depreciation cannot, unless the USA wants higher borrowing and imports costs (above the tariff increases) and a risk of loosing reserve currency status. 

    Lowering interest rates and tax cuts would make this all far worse.

    While I agree that daily stock fluctuations of ±10-15 points doesn't matter, a loss of 5,000 points in a month matters greatly, as it can cause companies to sell assets, cementing the loss, and it affects borrowing, investing, manufacturing, sales and employees. You're correct about the bond market and currency devaluation. Losing the US Dollar's reserve currency status is quite remote at this time, though, as there is no other currency that can take it's place for a variety of reasons.


    ramanpfaffelljayzebranubus9secondkox2glnfradarthekat
     6Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 24
    I don't think Trump knows how to put 'America First', he's creating more enemies than friends.
    He has greatly weakened America. All the rise in global power and influence the USA has built since about the beginning of the 20th century has been flushed down the toilet.
    elljaysconosciutobloggerblogzebraFileMakerFellernapoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2AfarstarglnfAbcdEft
     11Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 24
    America is heading for total economic collapse under the current administration. Anyone recently retired or thinking about it is toast. I'm in that boat. Another 50% drop in the next two months. Just a guess as insanity rules right now.
    elljaythtzebranapoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2Afarstarglnf
     5Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 24

    Whilst the short term ups and downs of the stock market can be ignored, the bond markets and dollar depreciation cannot, unless the USA wants higher borrowing and imports costs (above the tariff increases) and a risk of loosing reserve currency status. 

    Lowering interest rates and tax cuts would make this all far worse.

    There isn't short term on this one. The market (and retirement savings of many Americans) continue to plunge. This has already become a long term issue. 
    elljaynapoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2glnfradarthekatquakerotis
     5Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 24
    It may make me a "bad person", but I'm delighted.  There were a huge number of MAGA sycophants here prior to the election, and I really hope they suffer.  Thankfully my nation has a phenomenal social safety net; even those who are directly affected by trumpflation will be ok.  Sorry for the rest of you, but there's a better than 2/3 probability that you contributed to this mess, so, I've got my popcorn, enjoy poverty.
    zebranapoleon_phoneapart9secondkox2
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 24
    zebrazebra Posts: 36member
    I've always thought the US and the rest of the world were becoming too dependent on China. The hacking, stealing of intellectual property, currency devaluation and other predatory practices by China was overlooked by American businesses. Their greed for short term gain ended up hurting America's manufacturing future and self reliance.I love Apple's software and hardware . I switched from PCs years ago, but Apple lacked vision when it came to setting up significant manufacturing capabilities in China. Now Apple, their investors, and customers will has to pay for this error in judgement. It had to come sooner or later. China's misbehavior on the international scene is only getting worse over time. The US government and the population as a whole is finally waking up to face the music.
    Wesley_Hilliarddewme9secondkox2glnfrealjustinlongwilliamlondon
     1Like 5Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 24
    zebra said:
    I've always thought the US and the rest of the world were becoming too dependent on China. The hacking, stealing of intellectual property, currency devaluation and other predatory practices by China was overlooked by American businesses. Their greed for short term gain ended up hurting America's manufacturing future and self reliance.I love Apple's software and hardware . I switched from PCs years ago, but Apple lacked vision when it came to setting up significant manufacturing capabilities in China. Now Apple, their investors, and customers will has to pay for this error in judgement. It had to come sooner or later. China's misbehavior on the international scene is only getting worse over time. The US government and the population as a whole is finally waking up to face the music.
    LOLOLOL
    9secondkox2williamlondon
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 24
    The uncertainty is disastrous. Ukraine war caused the previous administration to start down the route of forcing tech companies to get out of China, and they started the chips act that has been widely thrown around for bringing TSMC fabs to US. This along with pandemic forced Apple to invest heavily outside China, in India etc.

    Now Trump is in the kitchen and making a much deeper mess...

    I guess Apple has to start fabs in the US, but the problem is that there are not enough educated engineers/people in the US to do it. The Mac Pro had a seriously arduous process to get going in the US, but they did it.

    TSMC says they have to bring people from Taiwan to US to make the fabs run.

    You need to invest in education and engineering, I have no doubt America can do it, but it is not something you can start from 0 to 100 instantly.



    Imho Apple should go a different route, they should invest heavily in 3d Printing and go after the IKEA method(but Apple quality). If Apple makes the Apple store an assembly store and start selling Apple 3d printers, they can circumvent alot of the trouble AND build up domestic manufacturing in one swell swoop. AND also tend to the admins wishes of things getting made domestically.

    Invest in the maker movement and repair movement, it makes sense. This also gives the AVP a reason to exist, as it becomes the best assembly/instruction manual you could ever want.

    If this forces Apple to re-think their business model to 3d-printing and propping up the maker movement, then this whole mess could accidentally be a good thing. Think Apple made 3d-Printers that can make functional products. Possibly good for environment, possibly good for Apple. Possibly a win for customers.
     
    edited April 21
    9secondkox2
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 24
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,579member
    I don't think Trump knows how to put 'America First', he's creating more enemies than friends.
    He has greatly weakened America. All the rise in global power and influence the USA has built since about the beginning of the 20th century has been flushed down the toilet.
    It has been a slow flush but Trump managed to get that gulp at the end. From Bush onwards, it has been a spectacular shitshow.
    zebra9secondkox2glnfquakerotis
     2Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 24
    I don't think Trump knows how to put 'America First', he's creating more enemies than friends.
    American share markets first, then catastrophe on the world markets. "I'll be fine," thinks Trump. "My holdings are in real estate."
    9secondkox2glnf
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 24
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,368member
    I don’t always agree with you Mr. Gallagher (but most of the time I do), but your work ethic and your articles are consistently high quality and worthy of consideration. 
    edited April 22
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 24
    nubusnubus Posts: 786member
    Countries would be ill advised to apply tariffs on iPhones or parts as it would be harmful to their citizens and businesses.
    You could say that about so many products. Adding tariffs on diapers is pretty harmful to parents. Tariffs on food is hitting families and businesses. iPhones are not essential for a nation to survive and they can be replaced.
    9secondkox2williamlondon
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 24
    Pres. Trump will not allow iPhones sticker price to go up significantly.  He would likely not want to be seen as the President who did that and ruined a great American company.  He will likely work something out with Tim Apple, ex. delay tariffs another 90 days or whatever it takes for them to expand production elsewhere out of China. 
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 24
    I don't think Trump knows how to put 'America First', he's creating more enemies than friends.
    American share markets first, then catastrophe on the world markets. "I'll be fine," thinks Trump. "My holdings are in real estate."
    His holdings could well be a millstone around his neck. His resorts/Golf things have costs. If no one has money to visit them (or wants to visit them) he still has to pay wages, property taxes, and everything. He may well be forced to sell one or more properties at firesale rates. Either that or pay those costs from his own pocket which if past form is anything to go by, that won't happen.
    Yes, he can continue to grift a few $$$ from his faithful but if those people are on the breadline or even out on the streets will they continue to fund his tacky lifestyle? Answers on a pinhead please.
     
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.