Apple is rumored to radically change up the iPhone 18 release schedule

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPhone

Apple reportedly plans to shake up its iPhone release schedule starting with the iPhone 18, with only the flagship Pro models rumored to arrive in 2026.

Foldable smartphone with three rear cameras and a sleek metallic design against a gradient background of green and yellow.
A render of what the iPhone Fold could look like - Image Credit: AppleInsider



Since 2019 and the iPhone 11 Pro, Apple has launched its Pro iPhone models alongside the regular models. That annual event each September or October was accompanied by an occasional mid-cycle update, or the sporadic release of an iPhone SE, but now Apple is reportedly going to change to a twice-yearly launch.

According to The Information, three unnamed sources in the supply chain claim that Apple will stagger iPhone releases into a fall and a spring pattern from 2026. There is no further specific detail about the change, but the sources say the more expensive models will launch first.

That would certainly mean models such as the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. But it's also possible that Apple will launch its first iPhone Fold at the same time.

If the report is correct, the move of the base iPhone 18 to a launch in spring 2027 could mean that Apple ties it in with an iPhone 18e. The first model in that range, the iPhone 16e, was launched in spring 2025, as a replacement for the iPhone SE.

Tim Cook has described the iPhone 16e as being "the newest member of the family." So rather than being a separate, occasional launch like the iPhone SE, it's at least hinted that this lowest-cost model will be an annual part of the lineup.

There's no indication as yet where the expected slimmer model of the iPhone would launch. While it will be a high profile model, the iPhone 17 Slim or iPhone 17 Air is believed to be a replacement for the iPhone 16 Plus.

That would suggest that the most likely split would be:


  • September 2026: iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, iPhone fold

  • Spring 2027: iPhone 18, iPhone 18 Slim, iPhone 18e



Supporting the rumor is the fact that Apple's sales are traditionally highest following the September launch. They then tend to decline, even when there has been a mid-cycle refresh, such as in 2023 when a bright yellow version of the iPhone 14 was launched.

While it is incredibly early to get detail about a model 18 months out at this point, moving to a split release schedule would mean Apple potentially spreading its income more evenly through the year. It may also drive more sales of the Pro models, since those will be available months before the rest.

And, it's not until the spring that the non-Pro models historically capture the majority of Apple's iPhone sales in a model year.

Then there is the issue of manufacturing and production costs. Every year, Apple's major suppliers such as Foxconn go on recruitment drives to massively build up their workforce for the initial manufacture of a model, for instance.

There's reportedly a shrinking labor pool for such jobs around Foxconn's facilities in China. At the same time, there is increased competition between manufacturers, so for years Foxconn has been trying to incentivize workers to join it instead of its rivals.

Plus, if Apple evens out its release cycle, it will also even out its distribution costs. It could be another part of how radically Apple has reportedly been changing its supply and distribution in order to minimize the impact of tariffs.

Rumor Score: Possible

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 12
    mccargosmccargos Posts: 18member
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    pulseimagesstarof80bluefire19secondkox2danoxlibertyandfree
     5Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 12
    Xedxed Posts: 3,136member
    mccargos said:
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    The market is so mature that annual releases really aren't making as much sense, especially with the average upgrade cycle for buyers are getting longer. Personally, I was a new iPhone every year like most AI readers when the iPhone first came out, and then it was every other cycle, and I think now I've gone 3 years and I'm still not sure I want to upgrade this year when a better camera and Apple AI being the biggest gains that I'd see (which aren't that important to me at the moment).
    edited May 3
    pulseimagesstarof80appleinsideruser9secondkox2danoxlibertyandfree
     3Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 12
    schlackschlack Posts: 740member
    Xed said:
    mccargos said:
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    The market is so mature that annual releases really aren't making as much sense, especially with the average upgrade cycle for buyers getting longer. Personally, I was a new iPhone every year like most AI readers when the iPhone first came out, and then it was every other cycle, and I think now I've gone 3 years and I'm still not sure I want to upgrade this year when a better camera and Apple AI being the biggest gains that I'd see (which aren't that important to me at the moment).
    This. When my 12 Mini died, I bought an iPhone 16 Pro 256GB but it didn't feel any better in most ways and felt worse in some ways (error-prone AI photo processing, slow onboard AI rather than fast cloud-based AI, larger and heavier, etc.) so I returned it and bought a new iPhone 13 mini off eBay for 1/3 the cost. Please, Apple, give us a reason to upgrade. 
    starof80appleinsideruserApple-a-day9secondkox2
     3Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 12
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 8,240member
    I have looooong criticised Apple's business model on this point.

    It makes all the sense in the world to stagger releases for the reasons stated in the article. Plus, it would keep the marketing people happy with something new to push every few months and draw attention away from competing releases.

    It would also be a positive in terms of iOS rollout issues. 
    9secondkox2
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 12
    Xedxed Posts: 3,136member
    avon b7 said:
    I have looooong criticised Apple's business model on this point.

    It makes all the sense in the world to stagger releases for the reasons stated in the article. Plus, it would keep the marketing people happy with something new to push every few months and draw attention away from competing releases.

    It would also be a positive in terms of iOS rollout issues. 
    It would also allow Apple to produce fewer iPhones at a given time which is currently necessary in India compared to China. IOW, this could Apple to shift more overall production to India going forward.
    avon b79secondkox2danox
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 12
    starof80starof80 Posts: 22member
    I will believe it when I see it 
    danox
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 12
    ForumPostforumpost Posts: 116member
    mccargos said:
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    Stagnant ideas and economics 
    9secondkox2danoxtiredskills
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 12
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,396member
    Really can’t see this happening. Two years later, the market will think they are selling old stuff at new prices. 

    I can only imagine what Samsung’s counter-campaign would say. You just know they’d jump all over that. 

    Apple already sells old stuff at new prices with the m3 ultra Mac Studio and that has not gone over that well. 

    Put that on an iPhone level with the hot competition there and it won’t be good. Can’t see Cook going that route. 
    danox
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 12
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,396member
    ForumPost said:
    mccargos said:
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    Stagnant ideas and economics 
    Except Apple isn’t stagnant with ideas. 

    Economics a year or two from now is anyone’s guess, but even then, no marketer worth their salt would just throw a perceived old thing into a marketplace liking for a new thing. 

    At the worst, apple would do what they did in the past by rebadging the old processor or selling the old processor in a new phone - even if the only thing “new” was a paint job. 

    But the entire scenario is doubtful. Even if an asteroid hit the earth and the iPhone business was cut in half, it would still be very profitable and worthy of fresh investment. 
    edited May 3
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 12
    SiTimesitime Posts: 67member
    Edit: never mind
    edited May 3
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 12
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,709member

    Apple needs to start releasing most of their products earlier in the year so that they never miss back to school or the Christmas buying season in other words have as much time as possible with new products on the market within the key parts of the calendar year, let the anchor be WWDC the more professional computer products should come out at WWDC so you have at least six months in a year selling the higher end devices and the same should also apply to the higher end iPhones too.

    WWDC is the natural release time (two weeks before and two weeks after) for any higher end products that Apple sells. Although it is unlikely to occur, consider the potential impact if some of the highly anticipated devices were unveiled during the developers’ conference. 

    The resulting boost in enthusiasm and extended sales period throughout the remainder of the year, leading up to back-to-school and Christmas, would undoubtedly be substantial. For the expensive items that Apple sells you need as much time/runway as possible for people/customers to make their buying decisions particularly leading into the last three months of the calendar year.

    edited 3:14AM
    neoncat
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 12
    mccargos said:
    I don't understand why you would stagger a iphone with the same number over a 2 year release like that 
    Math problem?   It’s 6 months between the releases. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.