Apple wants to screen real F1 races after its film's success

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV
Apple TV+ is reportedly looking to expand its sports coverage with a bid for the rights to F1 motor racing, specifically following the success of its Brad Pitt movie.

Close-up of a person wearing a racing helmet, their blue eyes looking intently forward with focused expression.
Brad Pitt in "F1"

If you thought Apple's
constant promotion of F1 would end after the film leaves theaters and starts streaming, you might be wrong. According to the Financial Times, Apple is in talks to acquire the US rights to screen F1, once the organizers' current broadcast contract ends in 2026.

Apple tends to try buying worldwide rights to programming, but that doesn't appear to be possible this time. At present, Disney-owned EPSN has the US rights, and it's that contract which is due to expire.

Reportedly, ESPN did have an exclusive option to negotiate continuing the present contract, but that ended in 2024 without a deal. Consequently, ESPN can now face competition from Apple and, according to two unnamed sources, potentially other bidders.

F1 rights have been owned by Liberty Media since 2017. In that time, audiences on ESPN doubled to around 1.1 million by 2024. Consequently, it's claimed that the next US rights deal had been estimated to be worth $121 million.

However, that valuation was before both Apple's "F1" movie becoming a hit, and Netflix's award-winning "Drive to Survive" documentary about the sport.

Apple has not commented on the report, and nor have either Liberty Media or representatives of the F1's regulatory body, the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile.

Separately, the success of "F1: The Movie" has reported prompted Apple to consider taking complete control over global distribution of its films. Up to now, the company has partnered with existing distributors to get its films into theaters, for instance with "F1" being distributed by Warner Bros.



Read on AppleInsider
lotones

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    rotateleftbyterotateleftbyte Posts: 1,648member
    As it currently stands, most F1 races are borefest processions with almost zero overtaking. Yes the British GP last weekend was exciting but most of that was down to the weather. (it rained a bit).
    I used to watch F1 and even go to the odd race but then it went behind a paywall and going costs an arm and a leg and then some.
    F1 today is all about how much money can be fleeced from the fans and now much advertising can be eyeballed by viewers and not the racing.


    I hope Apple does not pay good money for the F1 rights. There are better and more exciting sports to broadcast. Tiddlywinks perhaps?
    SmittyWmuthuk_vanalingamstuffe
     1Like 1Dislike 1Informative
  • Reply 2 of 9
    What crap. F1 has the world's biggest TV audience of any sport, and is truly global - even though most of the cars are built in England. Of course there's overtaking, and what's that about a 'paywall'? You've heard of streaming? It's not free.  In The UK, Sky owns the broadcast rights but so what? You expect to watch a global sport for nothing? Naive and ridiculous. You continue to watch tiddlywinks. F1 is for adults.
    muthuk_vanalingamdavidlewis54SmittyWM68000
     0Likes 3Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 3 of 9
    lotoneslotones Posts: 150member
    Yes please Apple!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 9
    I’m with Rotateleftbyte: F1 is only about the money and there is precious little overtaking, except because of pitstops. There are distinct levels of teams whereby the winner of a race gets the most money which means the top teams get an increasingly large income, which hardly creates better racing.  Most of the excitement from F1 is because of team arguments, rather than racing. I used to watch F1 but no more.  I have also worked in motorsport for over 40 years. Give me a meeting of ten lap races of one make series any day! 15 races in one day and really good quality racing all the time.

    i also feel the reference to F1 being for adults is a bit unpleasant.
    muthuk_vanalingamappleinsideruserM68000
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 9
    SmittyWsmittyw Posts: 40member
    Interesting perspectives so far. Marques Brownlee did a great video on F1 that focused a lot on the design and engineering aspects of it. If Apple includes a lot of those type of details during coverage it would be pretty interesting, especially with the Apple Vision Pro, where you could get 3D models of cars, engines, etc. Of course having 3D coverage and a 3D racemap to go between would be very cool too. If Apple releases a new AVP this year and does the above I'm definitely going to give it a go even though I don't really have any interest currently. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 9
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,882member
    I wish I could get an actual Toyota GR Yaris (not the Corolla crap) in America as a second car…. F1 No, thanks I’d rather just drive the back roads myself.
    neoncat
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 9
    mpantonempantone Posts: 2,492member
    What crap. F1 has the world's biggest TV audience of any sport, and is truly global - even though most of the cars are built in England. Of course there's overtaking, and what's that about a 'paywall'? You've heard of streaming? It's not free.  In The UK, Sky owns the broadcast rights but so what? You expect to watch a global sport for nothing? Naive and ridiculous. You continue to watch tiddlywinks. F1 is for adults.
    First of all, football (a.k.a. soccer for Yanks) has the biggest TV audience and dwarfs the F1 by a lightyear.

    And yes, here in the USA, it's easy to catch the FIFA Club World Cup, it streams for free on DAZN. The regular World Cup competition has quite a few matches broadcast OTA ("rabbit ear antennae"). Having to pay to watch a sport does not make it "for adults" [sic].

    As for Formula 1, it was a far more interesting sport in the Seventies. Today's cars are stretch limousines in comparison and make passing very, very difficult. It's really just a computer model competition today, whoever has the most powerful computers and skilled programmers running the best CFD simulations basically wins. 98% of the competition happens before the car is even assembled which is why mid-season improvements are extremely modest. That's one of the reasons why Verstappen is thinking about bolting from Red Bull.

    Worse, today's F1 doesn't offer good race visuals. The drivers are doing A LOT of interaction with the car's various systems and almost none of these actions translate into something appealingly watchable on television. The drivers are some of the most skilled motorsports competitors on the planet but it's not translating into an entertaining television product. If you watch 2-3 F1 races, it's easy to see 6-8 major issues that hinders this sport in 2025.

    With the individual races becoming so boring it's no surprise that the attention drifts to the off-track activities which have veered toward high-end lifestyle marketing, much like America's Cup yacht racing (also the domain of supercomputers and high-end CFD model simulations).

    There's no way that Apple could afford to become the exclusive streaming rightsholder for Formula 1. And with the way today's competition is being held I don't think it would be worth it anyhow as it has become so untelegenic.
    muthuk_vanalingamSmittyW
     1Like 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 8 of 9
    stuffestuffe Posts: 396member
    As it currently stands, most F1 races are borefest processions with almost zero overtaking. Yes the British GP last weekend was exciting but most of that was down to the weather. (it rained a bit).
    I used to watch F1 and even go to the odd race but then it went behind a paywall and going costs an arm and a leg and then some.
    F1 today is all about how much money can be fleeced from the fans and now much advertising can be eyeballed by viewers and not the racing.


    I hope Apple does not pay good money for the F1 rights. There are better and more exciting sports to broadcast. Tiddlywinks perhaps?
    £7 a month for F1 TV Pro direct from the organisers, for all content, 100% add free.  Bargain, simple, and easy.  Not sure where your bitterness comes from, if you don't like it any more, for whatever reasons, that's fine, but don't blame it on being priced out of being able to enjoy it.  If you've been to a few races before, then I know for a fact that even the cheapest race on the Calendar (Hungary, yeah I've been) is gonna cost you about 2 years subscription costs to watch everything else for a Sunday seat alone.
    williamlondon
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 9
    tmaytmay Posts: 6,470member
    I'm not a fan, yet anyway, but Cricket is coming to America, and given that this sport is popular in mostl of the post British colonies, it might make a great deal of economic sense to invest in a sport that has global reach, at less of an investment than F1.

    Oh, and by the way, Corn Hole is becoming something, and I'm told that there are athletic scholarships becoming available in some of the Midwest schools that are in competition.





     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.