Mac Pro: what's in yours?

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited January 2014
Just a quick survey to see which components Apple installed inside your Mac Pro.



My 250GB hard disk is a WD 2500JS, and my optical is a Pioneer DVR-111. My memory is from Micron.



Anybody know which 500GB HDD Apple use?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Messiah


    Just a quick survey to see which components Apple installed inside your Mac Pro.



    My 250GB hard disk is a WD 2500JS, and my optical is a Pioneer DVR-111. My memory is from Micron.



    Anybody know which 500GB HDD Apple use?



    NM. I read your post again. The Pioneer is Apple installed.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 34
    slugheadslughead Posts: 1,169member
    I got the stock mac pro from an apple retail store.



    I added 2 gigs of 3rd party RAM with custom heat sinks, two 300GB hard drives (for a RAID-0), and a 500GB seagate HD.



    That's a total of 1.35TB, for those keeping score.



    I should point out that seagate is selling drives now with updated firmware so that you can do 4 x 750GB drives (for a total of 3TB) in the Mac Pro.



    I'm pretty sure Apple's 500GB is Maxtor--yet another reason I'm happy I didn't get a BTO machine.



    And if anyone should need a replacement Pioneer DVR-111, http://www.newegg.com is selling them for $33 (new).. I bought one to replace the broken drive in my G5 before I sold it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 34
    My Harddrive is a seagate(250gb) and the optical is a Sony not pioneer....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by RBF817


    My Harddrive is a seagate(250gb) and the optical is a Sony not pioneer....





    Oh wow, mine too

    Code:


    SONY DVD RW DW-D150A:



    ModeltSONY DVD RW DW-D150A

    Revisiont1.MD

    Serial Numbert

    Detachable DrivetNo

    ProtocoltATAPI

    Unit Numbert0

    Socket TypetInternal

    Low Power PollingtNo





     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 34
    My machine was shipped from Apple with two Sony DVD-RW and a Seagate 500Gig drive. I'm not at home now, so I'll post the model numbers later, if anyone is interested.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 34
    Rush Limbaugh opened his show today saying he was using his new 3 Ghz Xeon Mac Pro Quad with 4 500Gig hard drives and 16 GB RAM.



    I'm envious. Waiting for my new mini to arrive next week.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 34
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    I've a 2.66 with X1900 XT and full wireless. Standard everything else, I think I'll be adding a fast-read DVD-ROM drive of some sort for loading backups, some hard drives, and more RAM.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 34
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mehdi


    My machine was shipped from Apple with two Sony DVD-RW and a Seagate 500Gig drive. I'm not at home now, so I'll post the model numbers later, if anyone is interested.



    I noticed you got the 3 gHz. The guys with 2.66 are getting 2-2.5 seconds on my factorial benchmark. I'd like to see what a quad 3.0 gHz would get.



    Attachment 128

     

     
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 34
    [QUOTE=lundy]I noticed you got the 3 gHz. The guys with 2.66 are getting 2-2.5 seconds on my factorial benchmark. I'd like to see what a quad 3.0 gHz would get.

    QUOTE]



    I will run this as soon as I get home, and will post the result.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 34
    My stock MacPro 2.66 is a replacement under AppleCare for a G5 Dual 2.5 that was officially declared dead recently. The hard drive is a WDC WD2500JS-41SGO and the optical drive is a Sony DVD RW DW-150A. The memory was Micron as was the additional memory installed at the Apple Store. The second drive from the dead G5, a Hitachi 250GB Serial ATA HD, was also installed.



    As a side note, the AppleCare I had on the G5 really paid off.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lundy


    I noticed you got the 3 gHz. The guys with 2.66 are getting 2-2.5 seconds on my factorial benchmark. I'd like to see what a quad 3.0 gHz would get.



    Here's the result:



    Code:




    /Users/mehdi/Desktop/factorialBench/factorialBench; exit





    Mac Pro ("MacPro1,1") with 4 cores, running at 3.00 gHz.

    Frontside bus: 1.33 gHz

    Installed memory: 4.00 GB



    50,000,000 factorials will be calculated by creating 4 threads.



    Thread # 1 created.

    Thread # 2 created.

    Thread # 3 created.

    Thread # 4 created.

    Waiting for threads to finish...

    Thread # 2: 12,500,000 factorials calculated in 1.984018 seconds at 6,300,346 factorials per second.

    Thread # 1: 12,500,000 factorials calculated in 1.985952 seconds at 6,294,210 factorials per second.

    Thread # 3: 12,500,000 factorials calculated in 1.986623 seconds at 6,292,084 factorials per second.

    Thread # 4: 12,500,000 factorials calculated in 1.988188 seconds at 6,287,132 factorials per second.

    logout

    [Process completed]









    I did run it a few times, but the results are very much alike... i.e. less than 0.01 second diffeence between runs. At the time, only Safari and Finder were open.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 34
    xoolxool Posts: 2,460member
    My 3 GHz Mac Pro's 500 GB drive is a Seagate ST3500641AS. Both of my SuperDrives are SONY DW-D150As. All 2 GB of my RAM is stock so Micron I assume.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 34
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mehdi


    Here's the result:





    HOOOO-BOY! Damn, that thing screams.



    I've added the results to my list. One of these days I will make a spreadsheet.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by RBF817


    My Harddrive is a seagate(250gb) and the optical is a Sony not pioneer....



    Same here... but seagate 160GB, sony dvdr.... and i added 2 more seagate 7200.10 250GB. not sure what brand my ram is
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lundy


    I noticed you got the 3 gHz. The guys with 2.66 are getting 2-2.5 seconds on my factorial benchmark. I'd like to see what a quad 3.0 gHz would get.



    Attachment 128



    Do you have an Altivec-enhanced factorial benchmark to run on the G5 for comparison?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 34
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    No, I can do assembly language no problem, but haven't gotten around to it yet.



    I don't really want the benchmark to run any faster - in fact I have it compiled with no optimization at all. If I turn on optimization, it speeds it up by about 600%.



    Also, I have to do some thinking about how to vectorize a factorial - it's not being obvious to me on first glance.



    I will upload the source if anyone wants to take a crack at it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lundy


    Also, I have to do some thinking about how to vectorize a factorial - it's not being obvious to me on first glance.



    8! = 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 40320



    8! = (8 x 7) x (6 x 5) x (4 x 3) x (2 x 1) = 40320



    8! = (8 x 7 x 6 x 5) x (4 x 3 x 2 x 1) = (8!/4!) x 4! = 40320



    So hypothetically you could "gamma" four 32bit ints (or two 64bit ints) in one instruction. I'm pretty sure the G5 has two Altivec cores per CPU core, so even better.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 34
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ricksbrain


    Rush Limbaugh opened his show today saying he was using his new 3 Ghz Xeon Mac Pro Quad with 4 500Gig hard drives and 16 GB RAM.



    I'm envious. Waiting for my new mini to arrive next week.



    Wow! I want a setup like that to order perscription refills too! Tis all in good fun...



    That is a really amazing setup considering his workflow is basicly several web browsers (he must have people doing all the audio work for him, as the implant can not deliver the fine level of hearing needed to make something like fake songs or phone calls sound good or clean up 3rd party audio clips).



    Really, what does he do on there besides play Tiger Woods and read the NYT so he can bitch about it on the radio?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 34
    Seriously?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 34
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Yeah, that's probably the most undeserved setup ever.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.