lotones
About
- Username
- lotones
- Joined
- Visits
- 52
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,629
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 154
Reactions
-
J.D. Vance shouldn't open his mouth about Apple if he doesn't have a clue
spheric said:In other news, immigrants in Springfield steal and eat others' dogs and eat them.Who the fuck cares what bullshit JD Vance spouts, unless it's subsequently picked up by Tr*mp to utterly embarrass himself to a worldwide audience?ssfe11 said:Clueless idiot. Oh and btw Springfield do you know that your pets are getting eaten? Fido is being roasted up right now. Smh you can’t even make this stuff up!As someone born and raised in Springfield, Ohio, one of the best things about my hometown was being able to grab someone's dog for lunch on the way to school.Good times... -
Lossless streaming option for Apple Music may launch within weeks
12Strangers said:Steve Jobs never wanted lossless. He and Neil Young had a meeting about that very thing before there ever was an iTunes Store let alone streaming. So as Neil’s Pono player and music store were about to start making money, Apple bought their mastering facility and shut it down. Because Steve was an asshole.I’ll stick with Qobuz.
Jobs died in 2011.Pomo launched in 2015.Pomo hardware was too expensive for mainstream consumption.Pomo's content partner, Omnifone, was bankrupt when Apple bought them in 2016.You obviously have a casual relationship with reality. -
Trump gives Apple a giant break with wide-ranging tariff exemptions
-
Meta cancels its headset rival to Apple Vision Pro
9secondkox2 said:No need to follow after something that isn’t quite working in the market.The killer app for headsets is entertainment - gaming and media.In that sense, meta even has the better product.Apple has the far superior hardware, software, and ecosystem.But all the hardware and OS polish in the world isn’t going to save a product that the market has rejected time and again - save for a niche subset of gamers.The quest is lighter, doesn’t require a tethered battery, and plays decent games.While there are some compelling engineering/medical use cases, it’s not a mass market thing.Most people just don’t want to be encumbered by a device for their daily needs.When it’s indoor/outdoor sunglasses, that may possibly change.But headsets just suck.One of the best decisions Meta ever made is saying “no” to this. Kinda like Apple used to do. -
Tim Cook isn't going to get fired, and Steve Jobs isn't rolling over in his grave
I loved Steve, and I'm an unapologetic Tim Cook fan. People who criticize TC are ignoring how absolutely worse things could have gone AS (After Steve). Just look around at all the embarrassing CEO bros and their companies that have either already crashed and burned, or those who are so damn jealous that they are willing to burn billions copying and/or suing Apple like spoiled children. They all want to be in the position Apple is in, and Tim Cook is how Apple got there.Picking Tim was the single best decision Steve ever made. That's what "genius" looks like. -
Party's over: Apple tries to shrink costs of Apple TV+ productions
I like Apple TV+'s content quite a lot. I find the quality very consistent from program to program. What drives me crazy is only 10 episodes a season, then you have to wait a year or more for a story to continue. By that time your emotional investment in the characters has evaporated, the young actors are a year or more older and taller, and major plot lines are a distant memory. I know this is the same model all streamers use, but if Apple wants to build an audience, longer seasons and quicker turnarounds would go a long way.Specifically in Foundation's case, spend less $ per episode (less elaborate sets, locations, and extras would be fine...), but spread it out to more episodes, and move the plot along faster.Keep the audience's attention you've fought so hard to get. -
New Magic Mouse said to fix everything that's been wrong with it for 15 years
-
Adobe hikes Creative Cloud prices with a rebrand no one asked for
I'm looking at this from the outside, since I deAdobe'd myself before the subscriptions started. But I don't understand how Adobe can justify charging such an extortionate cancellation fee, or why people put up with it. When a customer decides they don't want to use their service, they should be able to cancel the service and just walk away as long as their accounts paid up to date. Adobe can just disable the apps on their end if they must. But penalizing customers for deciding they don't want your service anymore just seems evil.This appears to me to be a textbook abusive relationship. Price gouging people with subscriptions is bad enough, but when there are now so many viable alternatives, why are people still putting up with this cancellation fee noise? -
Inside Apple TV 4K -- the best addition to your TV set
Yep, Apple TV 4K is one of Apple's best products, and it's still very underrated, even by the author of the article above. Apple TV 4K really shouldn't even be compared to other streamers, because it does so much more.I have two, one dedicated to my home audio system to stream lossless Apple Music, and even more importantly, stream music directly from my iTunes library on my Mac. It automatically upsamples my iTunes library to 48kHz (unfortunately it caps higher resolutions there too, but hey...). But the killer feature is being able to preview mixes conjured in GarageBand or Logic immediately on my large sound system! No other "streamer" does that.The Apple TV 4K dedicated to my TV stand is where I watch shows and movies, but also I can stream my Photo library directly from my Mac. I can also stream movies and concerts directly from my Mac (using VLC or 8Player).And as for streaming, me and a friend have been SharePlaying shows on Apple TV 4K for a couple years now. This is a fantastic feature, that works incredibly well. It came in incredibly handy while my friend was dealing with serious health issues. SharePlaying shows with her was how I "visited" her while she was in the hospital.There's a lot going on with Apple TV 4K that people take for granted when comparing to other "streamers". -
Apple Cinemas may come to regret their name as lawyers step in
VictorMortimer said:Hopefully 2010 is far enough away that they'll be able to use the elapsed time to demonstrate that the trademark is now generic.Lots of places and things are named apple, including a very common and popular fruit. This is why common English words should NOT be trademarkable in the first place. Apple should have stuck with Apple Computer if they wanted something trademarkable.Oh, so anyone should be able to open a restaurant and call it "Starbucks"? Or hell... an electronics store, and call it "Microsoft"? yeah... no.The Beatles' record label Apple Corp initially took issue with Apple Computers, until Apple agreed not to get into the music business, which it ended up doing anyway 20+ years later. At that point they sat down and renegotiated."Apple Cinemas" had to know what they were doing. All they had to do is name their company literally anything other than the same as the most popular company on the planet. But they went ahead and did it anyway, and are refusing to even negotiate with Apple. Either they are extremely naive in business, or intentionally malicious trademark infringers. Either way they deserve to be sued into the ground.