lotones
About
- Username
- lotones
- Joined
- Visits
- 52
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,629
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 154
Reactions
-
Hands on: Apple's USB-C accessories leave us wanting more
-
All hands on deck: Tim Cook, Craig Federighi address Apple employees on AI, Siri
I was up all night playing games on my iPad mini and only got 3 hours sleep. And now I feel like crap.It's all Apple's fault for making the battery so big. And Apple Intelligence should have told me to go to bed.Apple is doomed... again. And Tim Cook should be fired... then rehired, and fired again./am I doing this right? -
Iconic 'Trash Can' Mac Pro is now on Apple's vintage products list
-
How one hospital is reinventing care with Apple tech
inkling said:Another benefit might be fewer viruses and a better system of updates stay ahead of them. -
Apple Cinemas may come to regret their name as lawyers step in
Laroche1982 said:Anyone with the least bit of common sense would know that Apple does not own any brick-and-mortar movie chains. Yes, they do produce their media.All joking aside, millions of people with "common sense" don't keep track of even basic tech news as you might. It's just not their point of focus. So when they hear "Apple Cinemas", they are going to naturally assume it's an Apple branded cinema, especially if they are even just casually aware of Apple producing movies.That's what the issue is, and why trademark law exists. -
What Apple TV hardware will run the new tvOS 26
-
Passthrough audio is finally on the way to Apple TV, iPhone, and more
If I can stream hi-res audio from Apple Music or from my Mac I'll be very happy. At the moment I have to stream hi-res audio from my Mac through my disc player's inferior interface. Sounds great, but it's clunky. But it was made in 2016, so it's about time Apple TV caught up.And it would be nice to consolidate all my hi-res music into the Music app and stream it from there. -
Apple Cinemas may come to regret their name as lawyers step in
tiredskills said:lotones said:VictorMortimer said:Hopefully 2010 is far enough away that they'll be able to use the elapsed time to demonstrate that the trademark is now generic.Lots of places and things are named apple, including a very common and popular fruit. This is why common English words should NOT be trademarkable in the first place. Apple should have stuck with Apple Computer if they wanted something trademarkable.Oh, so anyone should be able to open a restaurant and call it "Starbucks"? Or hell... an electronics store, and call it "Microsoft"? yeah... no.