dugbug

rogifan_new said:

This headline is stupid. You can't capture more than 100% of something.

sog35 said:

Heads need to roll for this.

Making the phone thin and weak to make it nice was stupid.

Tim Cook is not free from blame. Ultimately he's the top guy and needs to take the fall for this. I'm not saying he should be fired but he needs to get the blame.

Apple desperately needs a shake up at the top. I'm sorry but most of the top level guys seem lazy and comfortable.

I would fire Tim Cook personally, I know that isn't a popular opinion.  

Soli said:

boopthesnoot said:

Why mention that Google started using this data privacy technique first?  Why is it that everytime Apple innovates and implements new technology there's always  some stick in the mud that has to point that Google is already using it?

The reason is clearly stated in a single paragraph. Apple's own comments made it sound like they were going to be the first to incorporate it. While this may be true for an OS, it's not true in terms of shipping SW. This data is useful. It would be no different than, say, Android saying it has groundbreaking, full disk encryption, without mentioning that Apple incorporated it years ago. An objective and honest article would help alleviate any misconceptions before they can arise.