dani0805

About

Username
dani0805
Joined
Visits
3
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1
Badges
0
Posts
8
  • House committee invites Apple CEO Tim Cook, FBI Director James Comey to discuss encryption

    cnocbui said:
    bugsnw said:
    I think if this was another company, people would think it prudent to help unlock phones on a court-ordered by court-ordered basis. The odds of this technology getting out are quite low. Both sides make a great case. I just lean slightly towards national security on this one. Even with an encryption key safeguarded by the govt./FBI, I would feel like my data was safe from prying eyes. We don't have all that much privacy out in the wild as it is. It's part of the give and take of rights vs. safety.
    Do you even know what 'risk' is?

    Being harmed through an act of terrorism is one of the least likely - therefore lowest risk - things that are likely to happen to someone living in a politically developed country.  You are about 4 times more likely to be hit by lightning in the US than be harmed through terrorism.  If it was proposed by the three letter agencies that giving them full access to all your communications and documents would allow them to reduce the chances of you being hit by lightning you would laugh - well I hope you would.

    You are 33,842 times more likely to die of cancer than through terrorism, yet because the three letter agencies effectively run the country, the US government spends $500M per terrorism mortality vs $10,000 per cancer victim.  Is that sane?

    Somewhere between 180,000  to 440,000 people die in the US annually from preventable medical mistakes and infections.  Maybe money would be better spent on educating people as to how low risk terrorism really is and then diverting the enormous sums spent on the war-on-terror to health care.  Even just being slightly more thorough in cleaning hospitals would have a greater beneficial impact than has ever been derived from the TSA groping people.

    http://thinkbynumbers.org/government-spending/anti-terrorism-spending-disproportionate-to-threat/
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/youre-68-times-more-likely-to-be-hit-and-killed-by-lightning-than-murdered-by-a-terrorist.html

    All this nonsense to retrieve a 6 week old shopping list.

    You sir made it into my personal hero list today ;-)
    cnocbuilorin schultzargonaut
  • Apple developing iPhone and iCloud encryption that counters FBI-requested workaround, reports say

    iBrownguy said:
    It's not Apple's job to protect us from "a deadly attack." They make phones and computers.  And last I checked, people in San Bernadino were killed by guns not Apple's iPhone. 
    And by accessing the iPhone in question they might be stopping a future attack by those Guns. You are right that it's not Apple's job to protect us from attack. But is it right for Apple to shield the FBI from trying to stop the next one?
    You seriously believe that? If I want to encrypt my data securely I can do that with or without Apple and you cant access my data not even in a billion years without reading my mind. So stop the bullshit. Preventing end to end encryption on iPhones just puts everybody, except the skilled people (most probably also wannabe terrorists) at the mercy of the agencies.
    hydrogen
  • Apple developing iPhone and iCloud encryption that counters FBI-requested workaround, reports say

    When, not if, Apple's attitude protects a deadly attack, please remember your support of privacy over safety. Apple's attitude is misleading if not outright dishonest.

    When, not if, somebody gets shot by a gun, remember your congress and senate that allow selling military grade rifles to anyone.
    When, not if, another (of the about 300k people a year) dies because of preventable medical mistakes or infections, remember why your government spends Billions in weapons, wars and saving investment banks instead of spending them in hospitals.
    Hypocrites...