holycow
About
- Username
- holycow
- Joined
- Visits
- 14
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 26
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 23
Reactions
-
M4 MacBook Pro upgrade could arrive by end of 2024
-
Apple Intelligence will face a big uphill battle to launch in China
-
EU has very serious issues with Apple, says competition chief
-
Apple's new 'Help Me Choose' quiz helps users find the right Mac
-
$5 billion class action suit over Apple's ebook licensing is based on false premises
Honestly, this whole lawsuit feels more like a headline grab than a solid legal argument. Anyone who's been in the digital space for more than five minutes knows that "buying" a digital product almost always means licensing it, same with Kindle, Spotify, Netflix, etc.That said, if you really want to see what a serious product liability case looks like, check out what Oberheiden P.C. is doing with the Paragard IUD litigation. That’s actual consumer harm with physical consequences, not confusion over fine print most people skip during setup.This Apple suit? It’s just fishing with a billion-dollar net. -
New poll says public sides with Apple over FBI in resisting iPhone unlock order
I don't see why Apple couldn't create a "backdoor" and give only Congress to control the "random key".
This way the FBI can never abuse it, and mandates that whenever the FBI needs to break in, Congress would have to hold an immediate voting session to allow it or not.
Serious matters like the San Berdinal case, the gov't has every right to acquire the data in order to protect the citizens.
Apple could apply this same principle in other countries where the devices are being sold, and never have worry of its responsibility.
We all know that if you, as the device owner, don't do anything "stupid" or illegal, then you should never have to worry about gov'ts intrusion.
Apple is against it now is all about marketing gimmicks!
It is only software based, so it can be easily done.