Cesar Battistini Maziero
About
- Username
- Cesar Battistini Maziero
- Joined
- Visits
- 87
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,087
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 339
Reactions
-
New Samsung ad takes shot at Apple over iPhone X notch, battery throttling controversy
-
Matter launched as a new Apple-backed smart home communications standard
patchythepirate said:This is fantastic. Does anyone know for certain if existing routers would be able to implement this, or would it require a separate bridge or an upgrade to a new router? -
Musk thankful for Apple's support in Twitter turnaround
-
It took Apple four days to sell initial iPhone XR supply
saltyzip said:bdkennedy1002 said:
No, it doesn’t have a full 1080p screen. It has a 4K screen win 1080p video recording.
6.1-inch LCD Retina Display; 1,792x828 pixels
326 ppi
Your response is typical of an apple user who isn't educated on these things. Thinking it's a 4k screen just because the camera can record in 4k.
Apple not providing a quick charger in the box is another scam to make more money. Not using usb c is another scam to make more money on cable licensing it just goes on and on.
I can't see the difference from a 1080p screen, and the Xr screen.
So I'm just going to buy that because it's cheaper, and the processor can run circles around any android phone.
And the amazing battery life of course..... -
Apple Vision Pro research and early work was hidden in plain sight
JP234 said:There should be, somewhere out there, a market analysis to determine the point of diminishing returns comparing markup/volume ratios.
"From" $3499 is too expensive for what VisionPro represents at this time. Yeah, I'm impressed with it. A lot. Am I impressed enough to buy one without asking, "Will this add $3,500 (or more) of value to my work or home life?" The answer is, right now VP offers nothing that is unavailable in some other, albeit less impressive format. Yet. There are plenty of ways to spend "from" $3,500 (plus tax, lens correction and AppleCare) that would equal or surpass the benefit I'd derive from a headset.Dump the floating windows. The market for VP as a work tool is too niche. The transparency feature seems impressive at first, but you could also just take them off when you want to talk to someone in the room. Is that worth an extra whatever? And why do we need to create an artificial representation of ourselves NOT wearing the headset when using Facetime? Let your contacts see that you're wearing them, and envy you. Or take them off.
Do what's necessary to get the price to $1,999, and add an eSIM. Now there's mass market appeal. Keep the $3,499 model for the upscale customer, call it VisionPro Ultra or something so they'll have something to brag about.You don't get what apple is trying to achieve, transparency is the key for this thing to work.Plus if you won't benefit from a product at 3500, but would buy it if it was cheaper, you might not need it in the first place.I wold greatly benefit from a MacBook Air right now, but at the moment I don't have money. Doesn't mean I wouldn't benefit from it. -
Apple's MagSafe is foundation for new Qi2 wireless charging standard
-
Senator's paranoia opens door for Apple to speak out on government censorship
-
Epic wants Apple held in contempt of court for not following through on removing anti-stee...
-
Folding iPhone & under-screen Face ID rumored arrival date pushed back -- again
-
New wave of iPads expected in late March hardware releases