faskil
About
- Username
- faskil
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 1
Reactions
-
Second class action suit surrounding Apple's throttling of iPhones with depleted batteries...
This is why I don't like Apple. They think they know what's best for their customers and also they have an amazing talent to cover their deficiencies up and repackage it to make them look like they are positive improvement. I gotta give a big applause to their PR team. Amazing people who can sell ice to Eskimos.
Any person with some brain knows the Li batteries lose it's charge capacities after certain number of charges, like 500 times or so then slowly after that it only charges up to 90 80 70 and so on then at some point if you can't stand less battery capacities then you get new batteries. Same with any rechargeable tools or electronic devices. It's a given fact.
I buy androids only because I don't like Apple's business philosophy. Regardless I understand both Iphones and Android phones will face the same battery degradation over time.
I had HTC, LG V20, GS3, Note 2, ZTE, 5 of GS7 Edges, and several tablets and notebooks from different manufacturers. Some removable batteries and some built in. My biggest worry about GS7 Edge was that when the battery gets old it is not as easy as the previous phones where I could simply replace the battery on my own besides the convenience of swapping batteries when the batteries dead.
Apple charges quite more than it's competitors because they claim it's premium phone. And they list many things as it's features but the thing they boast most is it's faster apu and their customers buy the phones for that reason among the others.
Well, I would think if it's a premium phone and they know the limitation of the battery technology they would design their apu so that it would be robust enough to operate even when the battery level is low or charge current is low. But they didn't.
So now customers complain that the phone shuts off at 40% battery level after using a couple of years or so then they throttle the apu speed so it does not shut off as frequent yet somewhat usable for most tasks just slower. "To protect the components and for the better user experience"
And they didn't let their customers know what's going on until they cannot keep it quiet anymore.
I don't know about the owners of other products but with me I never once had issues with phone shutting off until the battery level is 2 or even 1 percent especially with Samsungs. The screen might be really really dim below 5% battery level but kept going at full throttle. Yes the battery was draining faster than if it was throttled down but I wouldn't like it even if it had throttle down mode. I just control my use of the phone. Just use less if I need to prolong the battery time. But when I use it I want 100% performance out of it.
Many times I used my phones until the battery level gets down to zero over and over when I charge the phones then none of them stopped working! They always get charged back to 100% and so far there isn't a phone that became unusable because I used them until battery drains completely.
So I was kind of scratching my head "Iphone shuts down to protect the phone itself at 40% or so? So they slow down the apu if the battery gets old and hold less charge?" So what's the point of paying extra $$$ for fast apu phone if you don't get that full throttle speed after a while. To me regardless of how you want to look at it if it shuts off at 40% then it should say 0% because the phone does not work anymore at that point.
Well, if the Apple disclosed that after a couple of years of use their phones will shut off at 40% battery level to save the phones then far less people would buy them and that also a proof that there is a serious design flaw that low battery/voltage level can damage the phone whereas other phones don't.
Back to their marketing. Apple is the master of positioning of their products. They are genius at marketing and PRs. But I think they reach the point where those cannot carry them any farther. Like all the other big companies Apple is following Nokia's footstep and it's ironic that it was Apple who brought down Nokia.
It would have been fine if they admitted that with the older batteries the performance can be degraded and gave the choice to the customers full throttle all the way or less throttle for longer usage per battery charge instead of made that choice and shoved it down their customers throats. Pure arrogance......
But seriously the Iphones did shut off at 40% battery level?????? smh I don't see any premium-ness in it.