WGACA

I don't get this from Displaymate. Note 9 beats the Xs in more than 80% of all categories apart from 3:

*Brightness decrease under 30 degree angle (25% vs 27% Note 9)
*Color shift ( 0.1/0.3/0.8 vs 0.2/0.7/1.2 Note 9)
*Higher brightness manual mode

For the rest the iPhone Xs has:

*Lower PPI (458 vs 516)
*Higher reflectance (4.7/5.7 vs 4.4/5.6)
*Lower brightness in all categories apart from all white screen (725/695/766 vs 825/710/1050)
*Lower dynamic brightness (Good vs Excellent)
*Lower image contrast accuracy (very good vs excellent)
*Lower white color accuracy (0.4 vs 0.1 / lower is better)
*Lower color gamuth (103 vs 142)
*Lower color accuracy average color error(0.8 vs 0.5 / lower is better)
*Lower color accuracy largest color error (2.3 vs 1.2 / lower is better)
*Higher white point color shift (2.6 very good vs 1.3 excellent / lower is better)
*Higher Primary color shift (6.2 good vs 3.9 very good / lower is better)
*Higher color shift color mixtures (1.9 vs 1.8)
*Less power efficient in all catergories (2.2/ 1.8/4.2/3.3 watt vs 1.1/1.25/2.10/2.13 watt)


All the categories are even green on the Note 9 while iPhone Xs has 2 yellow boxes meaning it performed lower/average.

I'm sorry, but how could Displaymate call the Xs a better display exactly?? It seriously seems Apple paid Displaymate to market the Xs despite the fact the results both on paper and in real (look up youtube comparisons) tell a different story. Very dirty marketing this.