patentsRus

About

Username
patentsRus
Joined
Visits
1
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
20
Badges
0
Posts
2
  • OLED patent aggregator suing Apple over implementation of every screen it uses

    The suit is in US court over a US Patent.  Apple imports the alegedly infringing products into the US.  Apple is the direct infringer.

    US courts have no jurisdiction over what Samsung does in Korea.

    US Patents give the right to prevent sale, manufacturer or import....
    gatorguynetmageFileMakerFeller
  • OLED patent aggregator suing Apple over implementation of every screen it uses

    The suit is in US court over a US Patent.  Apple imports the alegedly infringing products into the US.  Apple is the direct infringer.

    US courts have no jurisdiction over what Samsung does in Korea.

    US Patents give the right to prevent sale, manufacturer or import....
    Samsung and Foxconn have US business entities. See also: Apple versus Samsung for about four years.
    Whether Samsung and Foxconn have US business entities is not germane.  The iPhone containing the allegedly infringing OLED is assembled overseas, and imported into the US by Apple, making Apple the (alleged) infringer.  Making OLED in Korea (or China) is not illegal under US law.  Solas OLED may be able to sue Samsung, e.g., for Samsung phones imported into the US.  Apple versus Samsung was about things that both companies imported and sold in the US.
    gatorguy