HiramAbif

About

Username
HiramAbif
Joined
Visits
17
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
26
Badges
0
Posts
13

Reactions

17Like6Dislike3Informative

  • Apple debuts $549 AirPods Max over-ear headphones

    HiramAbifHiramAbif
    From Apple's website - "Charges with a Lightning connector"... 🤦‍♂️
    pmhAlex1Ndysamoriadavgreg

  • Beeper has more ridiculous work-arounds for its iMessage bridge hack

    HiramAbifHiramAbif
    They're really taking that "Just buy your grandmother an iPhone" line seriously now. 😂
    roundaboutnowAlex1Nwatto_cobra

  • YouTuber wrecks car to test iPhone 14 crash detection

    HiramAbifHiramAbif
    I can't believe that idiot did that in with that amateur hour setup, and that it was even allowed on that property.  I was just "uhhh..." as I sat watching that car go off on its own headed toward the electrical transmission lines. 

    Also, why does every YouTuber start out with "WHAT IS UP, GUYS?!" 
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra

  • Reverse charging rumor resurfaces for the iPhone 17 Pro

    HiramAbifHiramAbif
    maltz said:
    It's probably worth mentioning that even iPhone 16 (maybe others?) can reverse charge Airpods and Apple Watch right now, but it requires a charging cable.  So saying Apple is testing "reverse charging" without specifically mentioning wireless doesn't even seem like a rumor - this is something iPhones already do.

    Wireless reverse charging would be great, though.  Especially if it could reverse charge other phones and Airpods and Watches, but I wonder if the latter is possible, since they seem to require a different charge pad than a phone.
    Wireless reverse charging does also actually exist now in current models - the iPhone can push power back to Apple's (now discontinued) external MagSafe battery pack when the phone is connected to wired power. 
    watto_cobra

  • iPhone 17 Pro predicted to cost over $2000 because of Trump tariffs

    HiramAbifHiramAbif
    Wesley Hilliard said:
    slickdealer said:
    The most likely scenario remains that China lowers tariffs on US goods and our reciprocal tariffs automatically adjust.  

    Why all of these articles fail to mention how reciprocal tariffs work baffles me. 
    It seems you are the one that doesn't understand how tariffs work. The tariffs enacted by the Trump administration were calculated using the trade deficit divided by the exports. That's not how you determine what China's tariffs are on US goods.

    China's original rate was less than 5%, but now they've got no choice but to respond to the US tariffs. The only way prices go down on imported goods is if the US lowers tariffs, not China.

    All tariffs are a tax on the country that imposes the tariffs. It is basic economics. The US government tried to impose tariffs in the 1930s to save the economy, but spoiler! It failed and led to the great depression.
    You go from "it seems like you are the one that doesn't understand how tariffs work" to writing false statements of tariffs creating the great depression and alluding to them only being tried in the 1930s.  

    The great depression was NOT caused by tariffs, and in fact tariffs have been utilized since the country's founding, and accounted for up to 95% of the revenue to the government up until the income tax was created in the early 20th century. 
    williamlondonRogue01jrfunkdadonfreeassociate212Strangerstrblzr