Mondain

About

Username
Mondain
Joined
Visits
19
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
70
Badges
0
Posts
21
  • Brazil will fine Apple again for not including charger with iPhone 13

    mike1 said:
    I hope Brazil wins, chargers are like 3-4x the price out there than they are for Americans. It’s not fair at all.
    What's not fair? That you don't get what you don't pay for.
    Maybe you should be more concerned with the ridiculously high tariffs and import duties on the chargers.
    Charging a phone is an essential process needed to make the phone work. Not selling a phone with all the necessary components is strange indeed. Not everyone has a dozen USB chargers in their kitchen junk drawers waiting for use, which is probably more likely in poorer countries. 
    williamlondondarkvadercurtis hannah
  • Is the new 16-inch MacBook Pro a pro-only machine?

    lam92103 said:
    So Apple took away our way to upgrade the machine, removed USB ports, and now they are wondering why no one is buying?
    What an odd article this was. The argument put forth is that the computer is indeed for pros, but if you like apple products, then just go ahead and buy! It really does seem like the author is trying to help Apple sell the product.  
    williamlondon9secondkox2
  • Seven years later, Apple was right to kill off the 3.5mm headphone jack

    dewme said:
    When everything works out and customers do not revolt it's easy to look back on a decision like this as having been a smart move. Truth be told, Apple removed the dedicated headphone jack because they wanted to, not because customers were demanding that they remove it. If iPhones offered built-to-order options that included having a dedicated headphone jack, I would check that option box every single time, even with the upcoming iPhone 14.

    Apple knew there would be some pushback when they removed the headphone jack, but they also knew the vast majority of their loyal customer base would quietly go along with their decision and whip out their credit cards to buy the latest iPhone anyway, plus throw in a few more bucks for a couple of dongles so they could still use their wired headphones, some of which cost more than an iPhone.

    Apple banked on our loyalty and willingness to go along with a change that they wanted to push on us. They prevailed and we went along with it despite there being no obvious benefits for us. It's not like removing the headphone jack was ever a prerequisite for the other audio connectivity options that were already available on the iPhone, like Bluetooth, AirPlay, and Lightning dongles. The AirPods would be no less groundbreaking or any less delightful to use from an iPhone that also sports a 3.5 mm audio jack.

    I'm not applauding Apple's decision to remove the headphone jack on the iPhone and will be even less enamored if they do the same with the iPad. They got away with it and we caved. They knew we'd still keep buying iPhones, and we have. I still have. This pattern of taking advantage of our loyalty isn't something Apple should be celebrating or something that we should view as a feather of inspiration in Apple's cap. They can only play the loyalty card so many times.

    The fact that other vendors blindly followed Apple's lead should surprise nobody in the least. It does not validate Apple's decision, it merely shows that they are going to copy anything Apple does without putting any thought behind what or why they do things. Just like the removal of a charger from device packages, Apple's moves only embolden the hangers-on and followers. They know if Apple can get away with it, maybe they can get away with it too. 
    Well written. I 100% agree.

    Apple is large and powerful enough to dictate and/or change the rules of the game, and there is very little anyone can do about it. I still intensely dislike not having an audio jack.
    baconstangdarkvaderAI_lias
  • Apple Car rumored to run new custom OS to control all aspects of driving

    crowley said:
    Definitely won't be an early adopter on this.  Apple make pretty good consumer operating systems, but not nearly good enough that I'd trust them with my life driving down a high speed roadway.
    Agreed. "...run custom OS to control all aspects of driving" sounds frightening. 

    From another front, I recall an interview with some CEO where they cast doubt on the ability of Apple to make and sell cars. I can't recall the exact quote, but the idea was that Apple is simply not organized in such a way to be able to make and maintain products that can (and should) last for decades.
    imnotarobotdarkvader
  • Geekbench reveals M2 Ultra chip's massive performance leap in 2023 Mac Pro

    You either believe in numbers, or you don't. If you do, then you have to consider that an out-of-the-box ASUS Rog Scar 18 LAPTOP  (Intel) scores ~20,400 in Geekbench (multicore), while the close competitor MSI Titan GT77, scores a little higher than that. They are between $3500 and $4000 laptops, so they have a screen.

    So yes, the MacPro with the new CPU is fast, but there is context here. 
    williamlondon
  • Elon Musk mulling offer to buy Twitter from shareholders for $46.5B

    bluefire1 said:
    @rotateleftbyte, why do you "hope he fails miserably"? Because he's an advocate for free speech? Because he doesn't agree with the arbitrary and biased way Twitter (and other social media companies) censor the opinions of those often on the other side of the political spectrum? 

    I get it. Musk's personality can be off-putting. But should social media companies, which are the primary source for news for the majority of the population, be able to decide which views are allowed to be expressed, and which ones aren't? Should they be able to make stories disappear (Hunter Biden's laptop) if they deem it to be detrimental to their cause? And should there be no repercussions when posts flagged as fake news actually turn out to be true, while what has been pushed as the narrative is actually false?

    Americans should be extremely concerned when the actions of Big Tech and our own government begin to mirror those of totalitarian regimes. And that is exactly what has been happening. I'll take free speech any day over controlled speech. I want opinions challenged. I want public discourse and debate. I want to hear all sides and draw my own conclusions. Don't you? 
    Exactly! The public company censors comments that either stray outside of or contradict left-of-center talking points. As Musk recently tweeted, “Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy.” He’s right.

    You misunderstand the 2nd amendment. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to an audience or a megaphone.

    You are free to discuss any right-of-center talking points in your local town corner. Or if you want to discuss more loudly, use one of the several right-wing social media platforms as your audience and megaphone. Of course these sites are small, failing, and command a greater percentage of fringe lunatics than other social platforms.
    grayfox691williamlondondrdavid
  • Apple earned $90.15B in fourth quarter of 2022

    Most large companies today are all about complaining about shortages, supply chain issues, employment, administrations, etc, etc. And here they are, absolutely raking in the gold, by the elephant-loads. And this is not just Apple. I guess I don't understand inflation then....
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Compared: Apple Studio Display versus Porsche Design AOC Agon Pro monitor

    It is informative that Apple has to be compared to an ostentatious luxury brand like Porsche. Like a Montblanc fountain pen or a Louis Vuitton suitcase, one has to wonder if their products are crossing into the realm of luxury goods...

    I guess we've come a long way away from the young and rebellious Apple shown in the 1984 commercial.



    watto_cobra