vikSC

About

Username
vikSC
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2
Badges
0
Posts
1
  • Coalition for App Fairness profile reveals organizational efforts against Apple

    narwhal said:
    Well, I had Tiles for a couple years -- but they were expensive and not great. Seemed nobody was running the Tile app, so your lost stuff stayed lost. I bought a bunch of Apple's AirTags when they came out and they work better and are cheaper. Tile and now Life360 are a business with no future. And to hear that Life360 sells customer data -- they've slit their own throat.

    I get that Epic doesn't like to pay 30% commission to Apple, but Amazon and Netflix didn't want to either and they found a solution that works for them. I'm thinking Epic would be better off negotiating with Google and Apple, not suing them. Make some money while their product is hot. By the time the Epic trial is over, they may not have a product anyone wants. Or more likely they'll get bought out by someone, someone who doesn't want to participate in a multi-year lawsuit.

    As for Spotify, I think they have a case. Since Apple competes in music streaming, Spotify should NOT be charged a commission. It gives Apple an unfair advantage. Same with other categories. If the host OS competes, they need to eliminate commissions for competitors in that product category. Probably should do the same for video streaming and audiobooks. Apple's not making money from Netflix and Audible anyway.
    I had to register here just to say to you: what a rare common sense opinion! I couldn't agree more with your take on Spotify position. Spotify case eventually may lead to some App Store adjustments through European litigation. Maybe Apple will preempt that with their own set of changes, as they did by dropping App Store commission to 15% for those earning less than $1m.
    OferTRAG