Toroidal
About
- Username
- Toroidal
- Joined
- Visits
- 3
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 6
Reactions
-
Bipartisan 'Open App Markets Act' resurrected to challenge Apple's App Store control
I could support some of this. I do not support turning iOS into some kind of public utility, where every new feature must have a stable supported interface for 3rd parties to compete the instant it is introduced. Whether it is LIDAR or UWB or whatever, the reason to spend the capital to bring it to market is to have Apple's product differentiated from the competition. The incentive to invest, the flexibility to make radical changes after introducing it, or the ability to remove a new feature if it does not work out, have to be maintained. (requiring access to all "consumer device features" opens the door for 3rd party lawsuits for changing or deleting some novel feature) -
Apple doesn't appear to have plans to revive the iPhone mini
The reasoning presented here for abandoning the iPhone Mini applies perfectly well to the iPad Mini which is a very small slice of iPads (~10%). Given that the phone market for Apple is much much larger than the tablet market, the iPad Mini should have been given the axe long before the Mini phone. Hence the angst of modestly sized phone lovers is well justified given Apple's inconsistent approach. Add to that, Apple Silicon is uniquely suited to small powerful devices, and Apple could offer what no other OEM could for truly mobile pocketable phones. As noted above, nobody else is addressing that market, which Apple could have to itself - and do it at a premium. Apple is no stranger to high margin low volume markets. -
Apple execs explain Apple's position in the AI race & how it isn't necessarily 'behind'
Wesley_Hilliard said:ihatescreennames said:AppleInsider said:Joz even scoffed at the idea of it being "demo ware," in what seemed to be a pointed comment at Daring Fireball's John Gruber.