indiekiduk
About
- Username
- indiekiduk
- Joined
- Visits
- 219
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 569
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 395
Reactions
-
Jony Ive's departure follows years of dissatisfaction and absenteeism
-
Compared: iPhone SE versus iPhone XR versus iPhone 11
-
Apple's Mac mini an 'important product,' staying in lineup
-
Beware of fake CleanMyMac installers that will infect your Mac
-
A 24-inch 4K monitor & Mac mini is a good option versus the Apple Silicon iMac
maciekskontakt said:No it is not. Monitor in 24 inch size is way too small and it is ill idea of someone who does not understand principles of human vision. It is the same as marketing foolishness from years ago about 32 millions of colors while human eye can recognize about 300,000. Selling on technical specs does not pay off.
If you really want to squeeze more information on screen that is expressed with 4K resolutions then you need minimum 27 inch monitor or better: 32 inch monitor. Tiny fonts do not work when you have to start using eyeglasses to see them. 24 inch monitor is for 1080/HD resolutions and it is old standard at this point, but popular with many applications including some office work. -
M2 chip production allegedly paused over Mac demand slump
-
Apple's powerful new Mac mini perfectly suits the 'Pro' market, yet the complaints have al...
i7 is for server rooms only, it will be way too noisy with air cooling given Intel still hasn't improved on nanometers for so many years now. i5's only benefit is the hyperthreading which is unnecessary on a quad core. The i3 has 4 real cores and gives comparable performance to Kabylake i5 but even better is it doesn't have turbo boost which means more predictable and reliable performance. i3 gets my vote, save the money for the upgrade to 256GB SSD (which is ridiclous it isn't the base spec at this price).
I think 4 thunderbolt ports was overkill. If it has 2 controllers then they could have cut costs by only including 1 and got the price down to $599 ($699 if they had included 256GB SSD). Could even put a display port in the space to save people needing to buy a USB-C to display port cable. I can't see anyone running multiple 4k@60Hz monitors off this GPU. And no one in their right mind would use a thunderbolt 5k because at that additional cost the 27" iMac is within reach and offers so much more value than a mini. -
New 24-inch iMac adds M4 chip, nano-texture glass option
-
Massive iPhone array will replace English Premiere League's awful video referee tech
-
AirTag hidden in luggage forces tourists to change vacation plans