rufwork

Wow, um, not the best job taking a modicum of responsibility there. “I’ve apologized to my father, and should have known better,” is probably appropriate.

Wow. 

GovtOS? How is this not fbiOS? Seriously missed opportunity.

While the video does show some areas are not detected fully by the tool, like the clothing of one dog walker,

Or, you know, the model’s left arm in that photo. 

[That 250 mil includes this and that...] and App Store continuing payments.

Oh, DED. Of course if you include every freaking HBO, Showtime, MLB, Overcast, NY Times... subscription, Apple has more than Amazon. 

But those aren’t Apple’s subscriptions. They get a cut, and that’s great for my AAPL, but let’s not compare Apple’s apples to Whole Foods’ oranges.

(◔_◔)

indiekiduk said:

128GB SSD is an embarrassment and will hurt Apple with so many customers having an inevitable bad experience

Idk. How fast is an ssd in a thunderbolt enclosure? If you can limit yourself to 128  on the road, which sounds possible to me, you could have a powerhouse compared to last year's model for a thousand less. 

Nice comparison to last year's best benchmarks in the review, btw. The 2016 models really seem rushed out. Apple probably would have done better to wait for Kaby Lake before upgrading at all. 

Maybe I scanned something wrong, but the difference between your 2018 and 2017 numbers seems off. You have 24326 for 2018 i9 and 22179 for 2017 i7. MacRumors has 22439 for i9 and 15548 for i7.

You're going from four to six cores. Seems like your increase for 6 core should be more than 9.6% more than four. I'd guess those i7 numbers in the video are wrong.