jume
About
- Username
- jume
- Joined
- Visits
- 40
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 82
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 209
Reactions
-
Alibaba's Jack Ma to retire on Monday, focus on philanthropy
oldcrook59 said:Jack Ma is lucky enough to retire. Look at other tycoons in China recently, many were either jailed, deceased, or bankrupt. -
Apple updates 13-inch MacBook Pro, adding Touch Bar to entire range
-
GoPro makes swift exit from drone market, confirms job cuts following weak Karma sales
mark fearing said:I suppose the best outcome for them is to get bought by a larger tech company. I don't see how they grow a camera business at this point. Aren't they more or less servicing a niche? And that's fine, especially if they hadn't gone public. Going public isn't always the best avenue if you actually care about and want to grow a company. But if they were beholden to the VC types, then it's not a decision made for the good of the company or its customers. It's a bottomline decision. They want returns on their investments. -
EU winding down Apple Music antitrust investigation, charges expected
hexclock said:dewme said:1. Apple builds a platform (at great expense).2. Apple opens up its platform to allow 3rd party content.3. Third party joins the platform by agreeing to the terms & conditions defined by the platform owner, i.e., Apple.4. Third party content provider decides they no longer like being treated as a guest in the owner's home.5. Third party content provider runs crying to their daddy, the EU protectionism squad.6. Daddy comes over, sues the platform owner, and beats them up with the protectionism stick of justice.Maybe I'm living in a warped reality, but this is like inviting a guest into your home and then having them sue you because you didn't allow them to sleep in your bed, use your bathroom, soil your towels, play with your dog, drink your booze, or drive your car. The court then intervenes and forces you to grant your "first party" or "owner" privileges to the third party.There used to be a time when ownership had its privileges. Apparently, or at least within the scope of EU protectionist policies, ownership means nothing. The EU thinks they own it all and the creators, architects, builders, and investors in platforms that cost huge sums of time, money, and resources are there merely to serve the state and its hapless minions who cannot create anything by themselves.This is nothing more than a culture of pathetic losers.
Long live the USA's capitalism that will save us all.
-
Apple TV+ has the highest-rated content of all streaming platforms
-
2024 Apple Watch Ultra will get 10% larger display, claims sketchy report
-
Inside iOS 10: Apple Maps will remember where you parked your car
djkfisher said:Tim, I love all things Apple, but, MAPS, sucks. It just can't get it done. Go for the good stuff, drop this and partner with, Ugh, Google, who can get you there, and on time. Some things are just not worth the effort.. This is one, Tim
-
Apple FAQ responds to investor queries about $14.5B EU tax edict
austriacus said:To add some facts to the general slamming of the so called extortion racket. Don't get me wrong - I love Apple products but they have been skirting their responsibilities for a long time like many other multi nationals. I don't like taxes either (I live in France....) but at a certain point we have to say its enough when corporations pay next to nothing for Billions in profits. Have a look at what happend in Ireland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement
-
Apple FAQ responds to investor queries about $14.5B EU tax edict
thewhitefalcon said:jume said:We are lucky for strong middle class and all the working-benefits in EU and most of that we have to thank to EU and I would like to keep that... So yes Apple you need to pay what you owe and please keep doing great products. -
Apple CEO Tim Cook calls EU tax ruling 'total political crap,' cites potential anti-US sentiment