moonraker

About

Username
moonraker
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
-
Roles
member
Badges
0
Posts
68

Reactions

0Like0Dislike0Informative

Comments

  • [quote]I mean, AI can't officially publish rumors for the time being, like we used to. Long story, I can't really explain. OK. I assume it has to do with the parent company ( Maccn) under pressure from Apple and as a commercial operation t…
    in AI Stats Page Comment by moonraker July 2002
  • Jonathan [quote] Rumor-mongering can't happen, due to legal concerns with our parent company. I'll leave it at that. Is this new policy or long standing? Surely discussing and digging around the future products Apple may or may not produce …
    in AI Stats Page Comment by moonraker July 2002
  • Except when they throw out the lot rather than allow topics to develop or seemingly 'Future Hardware ' topics locked for no apparent reason. let alone the ones that disappear without a word of explanation.
    in Locked threads Comment by moonraker July 2002
  • Jonathan: Rgiht. First off, THANKS! for the response. I appreciate it. [quote] Let's follow some logical progression. Other places on the web post pictures. Apple legal. Pictures removed. Pictures are posted in a thread here. -----…
    in DELETE FIRESIDE CHAT Comment by moonraker July 2002
  • Above all can some Moderator PLEASE explain what the hell is going on on this forum that USED to set tthe standard for Mac rumours but seems to be the plaything of some new moderators. Don't you guys have any pride in this site and what it USED t…
    in DELETE FIRESIDE CHAT Comment by moonraker July 2002
  • [quote] im not trying to be biased, or racist or any of that shite, but whats with this French site lately? First they get these "spy photos", now these rumors. I just dont understand how a French site can get more dirt then one based in the US. Is …
    in iPad (again), G5 and iRevolutionary Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • [quote]A real leader would have produced the G5s today. JRC. A REAL leader would have the balls to stand by his convictions and produce a stunning product that needs few words. Steve Jobs did that today. I can wait a little longer for t…
    in Steve on iMac on CNN Comment by moonraker January 2002
  • Well if you are a UMAX owner then two things should be bothering you. 1. UMAX have not attended MacWorld SF 2002. 2. I got this reply to a query regardi9ng UMAX scanner support for OS X today: [quote] On 9/1/02 11:40 am, "Umax Support" …
    in Scanner Support at MWSF Comment by moonraker January 2002
  • [quote] BTW Moonraker, I think you mean "Beyond the rumor sites. Way beyond." which has the American spelling of rumor, not the British. Just thought I'd be a brat about it since you're quoting That would be English 'humour' haunebu
    in New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Agent Cooper: [quote] Why do we let Intel draw on our insecurities and an bully us into a Mhz Pissing match? Threatening to leave the Mac platform every time our own internal expectations aren't met seems childish. I am not aware of 'threate…
    in New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Agent Cooper: [quote] Enjoy your date with the Dell Dude, Dude. Don't trip over your skirt on the way out.... The point is that should we be content to accept poor performance from an Apple Powermac or should we demanding the best? You may be …
    in New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • If this is the true speed bumps without a decent DDR boost it is simply the biggest load of BS Apple has ever spilled. Pure and Simple............ For all you saying " it's all right really" need help. Me I waited since last year to update. J…
    in New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Well something that puzzled me the day Apple updated the Apple Store (UK) was their ALT text for the new iMac family referring to it as the "iMac P80 family". Here is a screenie of it: Notice below right it shows the 'old' iMac family. I …
    in What is official iMac name? Comment by moonraker January 2002
  • iRumors are pretty certain there will be a white two button released with a new keyboard today: [quote]New Pro Mice and Keyboards Posted on August 12 2002 Â* As we reported on August 10, new keyboards and mice will be released tommorow along …
    in What about the mouse? Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • [quote] BTW Moonraker, I think you mean "Beyond the rumor sites. Way beyond." which has the American spelling of rumor, not the British. Just thought I'd be a brat about it since you're quoting That would be English 'humour' haunebu
    in Moved: New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Agent Cooper: [quote] Why do we let Intel draw on our insecurities and an bully us into a Mhz Pissing match? Threatening to leave the Mac platform every time our own internal expectations aren't met seems childish. I am not aware of 'threate…
    in Moved: New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Agent Cooper: [quote] Enjoy your date with the Dell Dude, Dude. Don't trip over your skirt on the way out.... The point is that should we be content to accept poor performance from an Apple Powermac or should we demanding the best? You may be …
    in Moved: New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • If this is the true speed bumps without a decent DDR boost it is simply the biggest load of BS Apple has ever spilled. Pure and Simple............ For all you saying " it's all right really" need help. Me I waited since last year to update. J…
    in Moved: New PowerMac specs Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • [quote] im not trying to be biased, or racist or any of that shite, but whats with this French site lately? First they get these "spy photos", now these rumors. I just dont understand how a French site can get more dirt then one based in the US. Is …
    in MOVED: iPad (again), G5 and iRevolutionary Comment by moonraker August 2002
  • Same in the UK. PoweMac 1GHZ DP was 1-2 days until today. Now 8-10 days also.
    in Delivery wait on PowerMacs just shot up to 8 days.... Comment by moonraker August 2002