tooltalk
About
- Banned
- Username
- tooltalk
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 766
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by zoetmb They don't have any of those things much of the time, but it's still not going to be heard by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court generally will only take on cases that have major constitutional ramificat…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay I consider (industrial) design as part of the hardware; that is what the consumer sees along with the UI, hence why I agree with the current disgorgement of profits. The consumer buys an integrated device, not a …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by eightzero Thomas loves to write screwy patent opinions. It's not a sure thing they won't take this one in an opportunity to be wrong again. Best of luck storming the castle! @eightzero : hey, looks like we have …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay Not entirely. I read the amicus brief that Google supported. There was a paragraph in there about a study that indicated that features are important to buyers, which is probably true for the White Swans. For Bl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jkichline I hope that SCOTUS makes an example out of Samsung on this. Reward the triple damages and make them pay for all legal fees. I'm sorry, but I've watched this play out since the first iPhone was announced an…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay According to F. Mueller, there are plenty more White Swans signing on to support Samsung in its bid to gain access to a Supremes ruling. Copying, it appears, is evidently not that big a deal to anyone but Black …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich If you think LG is going to sue Apple, you're out of your mind. @spamsandwich : why not? We now have a legal precedent that allows LG to take away Apple's entire iPhone profit for a small design i…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by RobertC The competition was not there previously. It was pretty much just Qualcomm and the odd Exynos for select markets. Going into the end of 2015 and start of 2016, we have Qualcomm, LG, Huawei, nVidia, Samsung,…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay I guess we won't really know until Samsung tries an appeal to the Supreme Court. @tmay : it doesn't matter whether the case goes to the SCOTUS or not. We now have a new legal precedent that says a design i…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay From the consumers perspective, is the iPhone a "highly complex, multicomponent tech product" or is it a unitary product? @tmay : Sure, a rubber iPhone case whose design represents the entire value of the pr…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay The Friends of the Court shouldn't have included Google, which is a close partner with Samsung in Android OS products, but it wouldn't have made any difference anyway, and this case isn't precedent setting as som…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Kibitzer Predictions: Samsung lawyers will almost certainly try to file an appeal to the Supreme Court, constructing some flimsy and far-fetched constitutional argument. The Supreme Court justices in due course will u…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich I think it's far too soon to insist that software patents "don't work". This is but one case. In many cases licensing agreements are the result, not litigation. @SpamSandwich : except that this is …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by foggyhill Pay up dumbass Samsung. Though they probably made 20B in sales and market development from this, so the penalty is ridiculously small. @foggyhill : yep, that's a ridiculous paltry sum, especially compare…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ksec 1. Intel has a division called Intel Custom Foundry, which produce chips for selected 3rd Party aka Altera and some other company not disclosed. It is not listed in the latest quarterly report so this may have …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by sog35 No it isn't. China is only 16% of Apple's revenue. Do you seriously think a 2% price hike on an iPhone is going to stop many from buying an iPhone? We are talking about $15 more. And anyway since the iPh…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by basjhj I will give you that a correct log scale would still be deceptive with regard to your graph. Posting deceptive, manipulative graphs in combination with claims that nothing is wrong makes some question your cl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by basjhj Ah, I see you have been catching up on the subject in the meantime. Good! @basjhj : just goes on to show that you are still trying to BS your way out. For the time interval values chosen for between log…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by basjhj That's just flat out wrong. If you had a log (base 6) scale x-axis, 0 would represent 1 (60), 1 would represent 6 (61), and any log base 6 of any real number in between would not be evenly distributed betwee…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark Now you're just making shit up. A log scale doesn't pause for a few axis tick marks. But that's besides the point. @jungmark : yes, you are an idiot.