equalunderthelaw
About
- Username
- equalunderthelaw
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 13
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gabe Villatoro Oh, okay. I thought it was very clear many years ago when I first came across Appleinsider that this is a fan site no matter the topic of stories. Apple users post regularly on Apple's product discuss…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SSquirrel Well the article never said it had anything to do w/the 4.0 or 5.0. It said it was about the 3 year old Player 50. Unless you're in here trying to drive hits for Samsung, I'm honestly not sure why you're ca…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SSquirrel It is still involved tho b/c it just shows how far back the copying by Samsung goes. Is the screenshot lift relatively minor? Sure. It could still possibly be introduced as more evidence of Samsung (possib…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by equalunderthelaw Ah, you have hit upon the very crux of the disagreement. I am not an Apple fan, but I do own and love an iPod Touch 4th Gen 8GB (Model MC540LL) now running IOS Version 5.0 (9A334). Quote: Original…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber Nice try. But the rhetoric employed in the totality of your posts is well in line with the typical troll masquerading as an Apple fan "who just wants more." Many of us here have been at it a long time and …
-
While I have enjoyed the refreshingly honest and introspective discussion about the Apple iPod Touch and Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0/5.0 specs, I think our discussion has strayed to far afield of the the original focus of this thread. I reiterate…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Because Adobe refuses to make good software for desktop, laptop, and mobile devices? Because after four years of Flash updates, it still sucks eggs? You have convinced me. I recommend that you: …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ConradJoe Many people would rather leave these sorts of choices up to Apple. In their view, a user might dislike one of Apple's choices at first, but everybody always comes around to realizing that Apple's choice is a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Enjoy your bindle of microSD cards. I'll take a device that doesn't have to rely on cards the size of my pinky fingernail to have a large capacity. I envy your ability to both foresee usage needs and a…
-
Thank you for your well-phrased rebuttals. You made a firm case for why someone should avoid buying both the iPod Touch and the Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0/5.0 based on their inherent WiFi-only limitations. My last post's goal was to emphasize wha…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil People don't want Android music players. I mean, that's what this is, right? I don't see any phone hardware on the list. I apologize for not making it clear that the Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0 ($230) and…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Your links are completely broken and don't make any sense. Which is probably okay, because your post doesn't seem to have a point. Thank you for your response. You are correct that the link appears to…
-
The Samsung Galaxy Player 50 webpage http://www.samsung.com/galaxyplayer50/ has NOTHING to do with the new "Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0" and "Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0" released in the US on Oct/16/2011. Granted, Samsung's naming convention, "50" v…