gnom

About

Username
gnom
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
-
Roles
member
Badges
0
Posts
85

Reactions

0Like0Dislike0Informative

Comments

  • [quote]Originally posted by Brad: The lines usually only wash out in really bad, overexposed pictures or really small, scaled-down pictures. This one is neither. but where are the Aqua stripes then? If you look very closely you'll see the…
    in White Studio Display Picture! Comment by gnom August 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by wfzelle: It's just that the current tower is such a kick-ass design. If they do a total makeover, I fear that the result will be worse. That is exactly what I am thinking too. No way I would buy something withou…
    in New PowerMac pictures leaked Comment by gnom July 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x: it doesnt scale properly it does scale properly, just keep in mind that this is not a frontal shot of it so the speaker is still oval when scaled. bye. [edit:]Â*aargh, missed the most important pa…
    in New PowerMac pictures leaked Comment by gnom July 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by DevNull: As for the SDRAM, the PDF is wrong. not wrong but lacking. It is Synchronous and Dynamic (SD) RAM anyway, no matter if it is Single Data Rate or Double Data Rate. bye.
    in New PowerMac pictures leaked Comment by gnom July 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Decurion: 1. They have new processor that puts out lots of heat. must be the Power4 or 5 Nahh, kidding aside, if they had one of the new G4s with 0.13µ fab process shouldn't that alone make it run a lot c…
    in New PowerMac pictures leaked Comment by gnom July 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg: YDM says Powermac G5 by MWSF at the latest. that´s what all the so called "naysayers" told you (not you JYD but you optimistic people) for quite some time and you (again not you JYD...) went after the…
    in YDM says, last PMG4 update, EVER. Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by JCG: OS 9 (Clasic) is going to be important for Apple for at least another year no problem, G5 won´t be here before. bye.
    in G5 will not run classic at all... Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by The Swan: Translation: hehe, exactly what i was thinkin´. "We don´t know sh*t but we´ll give it a try anyway." bye.
    in From macuser.co.uk.... Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by psantora: Why couldn't Apple do this? Think about it: 14" LCD, 600 MHz G3, 20 Gig, 128 Ram, no speakers, CD-ROM why couldn't it happen? I mean just to get in the door with some people... and for the education market...…
    in $999 LCD iMac Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Gustav: The table also says the G3 tops out at 450MHz, and the G4 starts at 1 GHz. the first one is true, Motorolas G3s top at 450MHz, the faster ones are from IBM. bye.
    in G5 next week. Certain. Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by philbot: The proformance range WILL be G5s some day. bye.
    in G5 next week. Certain. Comment by gnom January 2002
  • and this isn´t just a dream of a diehard Macfan? How would we know? I DO want to believe, I just can´t. bye.
    in G5 next week. Certain. Comment by gnom January 2002
  • not very likely IMO. They won´t make the dual with the highest clocked chip (apart from all the other arguments with iMac being 80MHz etc.). bye.
    in Interesting and disappointing news regarding Power Mac speed bump Comment by gnom January 2002
  • No problem, i´ll try and change my style a bit too. . After all very few people know for real what the deal with the G5 is. So speculating and looking for infos is all that is left for us. bye.
    in AbSoft Is Looking For A G5 Compiler Engineer Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg: I can't stand the way some people here feel the need to bitch and complain about how some OTHER people here supposedly "whine". that is not quite my point. I say if you cut yourself in the arm don´t…
    in AbSoft Is Looking For A G5 Compiler Engineer Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by G-News: a near release of the G5 (within 6-10 months) ´cept for: that is not a near release, at least not in the sense of most of the optimist here (who vote for a Feb./March release). 6-10 month is quite realisti…
    in AbSoft Is Looking For A G5 Compiler Engineer Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by KidRed: What does Absoft have to do with the release of the G5? see, absolutely nothing. So why the f*ck is everybody taking it as an evidence of the G5 being released soon? It means absolutely nothing in terms of …
    in AbSoft Is Looking For A G5 Compiler Engineer Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by mmicist: A compiler writer really needs access to the chip the compiler is producing code for that´s another indication of the G5 not coming anytime soon. If they are looking for an Engineer _now_ the chip is about a …
    in AbSoft Is Looking For A G5 Compiler Engineer Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by bunge: In all fairness, Darwin, Quicktime, OpenGL, and Java 2 all run on AMD processors right now. Darwin runs, true, QT not really, sure the playersoftware runs but in OS X QuickTime is a whole Framework, not just…
    in The next generation Macintosh Comment by gnom January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by superbob: more than half the work is already done, Darwin has already been ported that is about 10-20% of OS X, and let me add that Darwin is the easy 10%. Take a look at this graph and you get a pretty good …
    in The next generation Macintosh Comment by gnom January 2002