iang1234
About
- Username
- iang1234
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 35
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ascii I think Airport routers run the VxWorks operating system, the same one as the Mars rovers. Does this mean the rovers are also vulnerable to Heartbleed? Heartbleed is a bug on OpenSSL which is used to provid…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by BigMac2 That make me laugh, ART is still a VM but instead of a JIT like Dalvik, ART is an OAT (Ahead-of-time), this mean apps still got a performance taxes from running inside a virtual machine abstraction layer. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by nikilok Does any Android Store have something similar to this functionality ? Android has multiple APKs support that allows developers to provide different APKs for different target devices (based on the API level…
-
bigmac2 wrote: » But 64bit versions of Windoze does have to run his shit in a VM (SysWoW64), which isn't the case for OSX and iOS. From what I understand (well, after reading Wikipedia), SysWoW64 is not a VM. It's a set of compatibility librar…
-
bigmac2 wrote: » Do you know if the GUI is part of the binary on Android apps? The layout files, images, strings, etc are separated from the binaries.
-
bigmac2 wrote: » One thing I don't know about the Android APK stuff, does every build shares the assets, like gui stuff or they are duplicated for every build included in the APK? Because on OSX, the UI part and assets are store outside of the bi…
-
bigmac2 wrote: » Still this is not fat binary support, it only a fat installer trick for managing multiple single arch binary Why fat binary (as opposed to multiple single arch binaries) is important?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer No this is not what this artilce is referring to. It's referring to WebKit proper, NOT Blink, Google-forked WebKit. http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/153624 http://t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Doesn't the article say that WebKit is the first browser engine to support the standard? Chrome would be the next. Same standard different engines unless I've misunderstood, with the article as …
-
Do you think Apple will disclose what they see happened? perhaps like what Ubuntu folks did here http://blog.canonical.com/2013/07/30/ubuntu-forums-are-back-up-and-a-post-mortem/
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wizard69 I actually see this as a good sign. The idea is that this is a non trivial update. I believe a non trivial update should be accompanied with a non trivial testing.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chadmatic I have a feeling that the issue is quite a bit more complicated than simply switching between a primary and a backup. Well.. having a backup is one thing, being able to restore the b…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee I think what I find most irritating is that irrespective of this or that company, a lot of the information Apple needs to fix their maps is actually available open source and free of charge, but…
-
Perhaps it's like Wine (or Darwine) that mimics Windows' API to run Windows apps?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wizard69 Computer systems have always been binary so there is no problem at all with using kilo mega and what have you in this context. Unfortunately not all "kilo" in computer systems is 1024. When w…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismX The only app I use that I think is even Java-based is a Pearson-Vue app for practice exams. That looks alright. The UI doesn't appear to be created in Java. I wish it was as I assume that woul…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 How come it doesn't open in Safari or Firefox? If this is an example of Google's "open" web standards it's pretty useless? Does it need ActiveX or something? Err.. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mstone By creating googlechrome:// as a protocol they are doing essentially the same thing that Apple does with iBooks among other custom URLs that they use. For example, itms-books:// is the pro…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse I understand that this takes advantage of an existing feature, but it can potentially be used to identify what apps that support known URL schemes are installed on a user's device. This is …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse This sounds like a security hole in the sandboxing that Apple needs to plug in the next iOS update. Apps ought not be able to check what other apps are installed. Every apps on iOS…