d4njvrzf
About
- Username
- d4njvrzf
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 797
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Android and Chrome OS both run on a Linux kernel, but Android apps use a Virtual Machine architecture taken from Java Not as of 5.0 and ART, which compiles programs at installation time to native code.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jfc1138 The Google system reportedly does not use a Secure Element but rather host card emulation, storing all the information in the cloud. http://www.macworld.com/article/2927428/how-google-took-a-page-from-apple-t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by CanukStorm Obviously Apple doesn't server products so you can't really make a comparison with MS there. Nor does Apple pretend to have any. Their gateway into the enterprise is their devices, pure and simple and eve…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Scapal Now they make it again, how useless and powerless is it to use your smartphone as a desktop, hey look I can make Windows run on my phone, with a big screen. Why would one run anything but desktop Windows when co…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by cali Giggle thought they were smart when they purchased Motorola. I remember an article that said Apple was doomed because Giggle's Motorola patents would dismantle iPhone for good. None of that worked. This is …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by fallenjt your 1) is irrelevant. Look at the front bezels of these Nexus, they're big enough for 3 buttons with the size of that ImPrint. 2) the it's limited to index finger on the hand holding the phone which is a …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich That's Commie/Google talk. The problem, as they say, is not software patents per se, but rather the quality of patents. Joel Spolsky (former Microsofter) had this to say: "Software developers don’t …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by oberpongo Another rip Off from parallels. While every new OS from apple and now even Microsoft is free, parallels charges 50 for it. Every year. And at least every other year one has to shell out This to ensure compat…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by lkrupp Because what some idiot does to ‘his’ property can reflect badly on Apple’s reputation. And the hack described here does just that. It makes the product look ridiculous. By that logic, car manufacturers s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY It's not a theory, the SE is on NXP's chip because it's the best option for using NFC. Apple Pay also using the SE for making secure payments is simply a bonus, and one I hope will grow into more online o…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY 2) Space savings is minimal, and manufacturing and designing your own chip — which they aren't yet doing — to make it "easier" is ridiculous for any short term goals. The primary reason for the inclusio…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY OK, Genius, if the NFC chip doesn't contain the Secure Element then where is it on the iPad logic board and why does the iPad have the HW sans the antennas? Apple chose to combine the NFC chip and secure…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY I have a hard time believing you are that daft and quite frankly I'm sick of explaining what should be common knowledge to anyone that can find this site and figure out how to create a login so I'll leave…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY :infinite facepalms: I still have no idea why you brought up NFC. The sole purpose of NFC is to wirelessly transmit your token to the merchant's receiver for an in person transaction. It's just a wireles…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY Stop using tokenization like it in and of itself is all that's needed for proper, end to end security! Tokenization on Google Wallet is like padlocking a screen door to a vault then saying it's the same …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismY FUÇK TOKENS! Tokenization is not the fucking same as getting banks to change their back end to store a representational card number on your device so that even if your device was stolen an could be hacked…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum First the amount of data transmitted — on mobile it is very expensive -- LTE Data rates. HTML is quite inefficient, JavaScript is the pits. XML is about 70-90% overhead … JSON is better, but can easil…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum The main compelling reasons that I can think of are: speed -- not only running the app on the server, but transmission speed and performance at the client side (especially mobile) function -- somet…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mstone I do agree in part with your comments but I stand behind my argument that Linux has lots of professionals looking over the code for the benefit of the platform. In comparison you don't hear the same sort of devo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton Are you one of these theoretical "people with older hardware"? Or just another "will someone please think of the children people with older hardware???" rhetorical argument? (That is a serious quest…