coollector
About
- Username
- coollector
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 19
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark Google is charging $1500 for a cell phone accessory. It's the price paid by the developers to get a prototype. The public price will be much lower. But I agree with you that Google is b…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ipen Hope Apple can beat Google to it. Please explain why you prefer Apple over Google. You like to pay the Apple tax? You like to be treated with disdain?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Marvin I've never seen the light on it. Is there a demo video that shows it coming on? I've searched too, and I've found nothing. I think the red light is only shown to the GG owner (this I have seen …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Frood These are going to have a big impact on the world It's certainly a device that will hit barriers, but I doubt it's a device that will break barriers. We have more to lose than to gain.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Relic Bien sûr, quand et où!
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Relic I'm afraid that it's too late in places like the US or UK, legislation in these countries have already authorized the use of digital surveillance without the need of a warrant. I'm from France, …
-
For the moment, people are surprised and don't know how to react, but it'll soon be a know fact that it's ok to break the toy of the GG owners who ask for it. I'll be happy to shatter one or two myself.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by rcfa I'd want to see legislation that would exactly prevent that sort of thing. Agreed. I feel exactly the same as you. I was pleasantly surprised by reading this forum to discover that most of …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Relic Then later we will all have devices like this; Me too, I'm very excited by this kind of device. I dream of a head mounted display with the resolution of a computer screen (or even better…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by dreyfus2 What is the real problem? People taking pictures or video without you knowing certainly isn't. There are several ways to do that. The privacy and the annoyance are 2 different things. The privacy…
-
I don't care when I'm filmed by public cameras. Probably nobody will ever see the images unless a drama happens. But it's a completely different situation if a guy takes a video of me with his GG. He's not doing it for security purposes. Wha…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee There are cameras everywhere nowadays and while most people don't notice them (and to that degree they are "secret"), they are no different from Google glass. The personal managing the p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee I HATE ONIONS! (which is about as relevant as your comment to this discussion). Seriously?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee "Perverted" uses aside … there are lots of times when you want to take a picture and you don't necessarily want to alert the other person to that fact. ... If we start saying that n…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse The product is already dead. Any business owner who doesn't ban Glass is asking for trouble. You're optimistic. I'm 80% sure that the GG will take off. I'm not interested the lea…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Every component of Glass is almost certainly controllable via software. The red light should definitively be hardwired, and if the led is dead, then the camera is dead too. Googl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Hey, it's open! This could be hardware instead of software.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse It does show a red light, but how long is it going to take for someone to hack that and turn it off? Thank you, I did not know that. I hope that Google made it very hard to hack,…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TheMacMan When using a phone or a camera, it's a little obvious your filming or taking a shot. With Glasses, you're just wearing it and people don't know if you actuly recording or not. So privacy concer…