carnegie
About
- Username
- carnegie
- Joined
- Visits
- 213
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,613
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,085
Reactions
Comments
-
nubus said: AppleInsider said:It is unclear exactly why Apple wants to sell bonds and raise cash, especially since its Q2 2025 results revealed it had $28 billion in "cash and cash equivalents," along with other assets. Apple must b…
-
Judge Mehta denied Apple's emergency motion for stay yesterday. He also denied the alternative relief - full access to the record until the D.C. Circuit rules on its appeal - that Apple had asked for. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usc…
-
Xed said: anonymouse said: Xed said: anonymouse said: SmittyW said: Mike Wuerthele said: SmittyW said: Wesley Hilliard said: canukstorm said: DAalseth said: I wonder if Trump know…
-
spheric said: radarthekat said: mongobongo said: carnegie said:I suppose the U.S. government could again try to get involved, filing a complaint of some sort, since that's where the money that Ireland will collect will ultim…
-
https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000320193/33ab9a1c-e116-4117-9323-2355cba0fa2f.pdf On August 30, 2016, the European Commission (the “Commission”) announced its decision that Ireland granted state aid to Apple Inc. (the “Company”) by prov…
-
mongobongo said: carnegie said:I suppose the U.S. government could again try to get involved, filing a complaint of some sort, since that's where the money that Ireland will collect will ultimately effectively be coming from. How is t…
-
As I read the decision, the Court of Justice decided sua sponte to issue a final judgment such that the case won't be returning to the General Court for further considerations. Neither the appellant (i.e. the European Commission) nor the intervener …
-
AppleInsider said: Apple CEO Tim Cook has sold shares in his company worth about $33 million, and received just under half that after tax. As detailed in a filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cook sold 196,410 shares, and di…
-
foregoneconclusion said: gatorguy said: The book case concerned illegal collusion that resulted in price fixing between Apple and the major publishers. 65% market share is absolutely a relevant statistic when it comes to a company's expos…
-
foregoneconclusion said: gatorguy said: Apple fast approaching 65% market share in the US won't be helpful to their defense. Market share isn't relevant. Apple lost the e-book lawsuit regarding illegal conspiracy at a time when Amazon…
-
This case should have been over years ago. Under existing U.S. antitrust law, i.e. the Supreme Court's Illinois Brick (1977) decision, the plaintiffs, i.e. iOS app consumers, didn't rightfully have standing to bring such an antirust suit. But Justic…
-
strongy said: avon b7 said: I found a heavily redacted file of the case,(. pdf): https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Apple-iPhone-…
-
AppleZulu said: MplsP said: AppleZulu said: MplsP said: Wait…doesn’t this just disprove Apple’s argument that they’ll suffer irreparable harm? tht said: And so it goes. Gurman is rumor-mongoring that Apple is wor…
-
I just got mine ordered. It was a very easy process.
-
I'd note that this is one issue on which Apple initially lost, with the district court determining that Apple wasn't entitled to attorney's fees from Epic. But the Ninth Circuit reversed that finding and remanded to the district court to determine h…
-
chasm said: foregoneconclusion said: godofbiscuitssf said: So Apple has to allow companies to say "you go to
-
foregoneconclusion said: carnegie said: foregoneconclusion said: godofbiscuitssf said: So Apple has to allow companies to say "you go to to subscribe", but Epic and other companies don't have a right to their own app s…
-
tech_traveller said: Well, despite Tim Sweeney being a crook, you can't deny that this case helped developers. Now they can advertise prices where they get 100% of the income, maybe we will even get cheaper options now. That (i.e. develo…
-
foregoneconclusion said: godofbiscuitssf said: So Apple has to allow companies to say "you go to to subscribe", but Epic and other companies don't have a right to their own app stores? The anti-steering ruling was specific to Cali…
-
godofbiscuitssf said: So Apple has to allow companies to say "you go to