agentgg
About
- Username
- agentgg
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 5
Reactions
Comments
-
The article and the caption is wrong. The patent could not be rejected for being different. The design patent must have been rejected because the previous Apple patents were published and included the same design, and no priority grant was given. …
-
What about if you were the absolute first one to ever design a phone with round corners, ever before anyone else? You might feel different about way patents protect those who first have the idea. Note that patent ideas are specified and documented…
-
The patent laws (and most laws in general) are not based on simplistic understandings of the subject matter, as that would be unworkable. Patents are a kind of monopoly granted by the government under certain rules for subject matter that is descri…
-
The caption and article are incorrect (as is much of the information you will ever read about patents that gets published). The later design patent could only be denied because it had the *SAME* design as the previously filed and published applicat…
-
"As seen in the image above, taken from the USPTO's decision, D'677 shows different design attributes from Apple's own prior art and therefore does not meet requirements of patentability laid out in Title 35 of the U.S. Code." This does not make an…