big_fan
About
- Username
- big_fan
- Joined
- Visits
- 3
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 8
Reactions
Comments
-
I think it was when Intel fell behind with Skylake. And if you believe the rumor that what actually went wrong with the Butterfly Keyboards was how hot the machine got, and it damaged the keys, then Apple’s design was limited by Intel. And if you go…
-
zimmie said: I noticed something interesting. At first, I thought Apple just replaced all the machines which used only Intel's integrated GPUs, leaving the discrete GPU machines for later updates. That's not it, though. The 13" MacBook Pro w…
-
john120165 said: Im not seeing a reason to chose the more expensive 13" pro over the cheaper Air for a 200£ saving. Both have this.. Apple M1 chip with 8‑core CPU, 8‑core GPU and 16‑core Neural Engine8GB unified memory512GB SSD storage¹Retina…
-
mfryd said: Perhaps I missed it. But I did not see any mention of clock speed, or Windows compatibility. I need to occasionally run Windows software. I current use Parallels. Will Apple Silicon based chips be able to run Parallels and Win…
-
clementineorange said: I'm more just venting that back in the day when Jobs came back he simplified the product line to have obvious differences, so basically: desktop pro | desktop normal ---------------------------------------- laptop p…
-
Again.. sorry about the quote thingy. If Apple didn’t think they could make better, ground breaking devices with Apple Silicon. Then they shouldn’t have switched. But these are baseline. They aren’t even high end devices yet. That’s coming in …
-
Sorry if the quote thing below was messed up. Anyway.. I don’t know if people he thought that, but I always assumed these chips would be custom built for their computer line. I always used the iPad Pro as an example- it’s pretty powerful especia…