velocityengined

About

Username
velocityengined
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
-
Roles
member
Badges
0
Posts
11

Reactions

0Like0Dislike0Informative

Comments

  • Before I head off into dreamland I thought I'd be partial and give my likes and dislike regarding Apple in the last year or so. The Good: 1)OSX is very nice. Everything looks sharp and so far has not crashed on me once. That is impressive. 2)iT…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg: LOL, utter nonsense. If this is so, then why is the iMac so cheap? The iMac is basically a cube, WITH an LCD display, that costs less than the cube did. Apple spent two years designing the iMac, f…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • So maybe try to understand the other guy--relax and take a few deep breaths--and think of the positive things about the Mac platform, OS X, Apple Computer, and Steve Jobs. [ 01-17-2002: Message edited by: bradbower ][/QB][/QUOTE] Uh, …
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg: The powermac line is due for an update. It will get one, soon. I don't understand all the anger being directed towards the powermac lineup. If Apple had given the powermacs some lame half-assed upda…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by ColorClassicG4: Ah, another loony bin thread. "The recently released product isn't targeted to me! That must mean Apple is going down the tubes!" "Why, Apple's released iMacs with chips in the tower's class! They…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by BRussell: I can think of one reason: the 1 Ghz chip doesn't exist. A 700Mhz G4 cube would be reasonable, given that the iMac with the display is $1299. I think it's interesting that they've said they have lower mar…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • They weren't able to sell the underpowered G4 450 Cube with good enough margins at 1299 to keep it. what makes you think a high powered cube would sell for even less?[/QB][/QUOTE] No way. You know that the Cube didn't sell because it was origi…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [QUOTE]Originally posted by applenut: Applenut, why isn't a 1ghz Cube reasonable at $999? Not even a G3 version? What makes apple customers believe that any Apple processor at 1 ghz is worth 1600 or so dollars? Not trying to argue with you/ Jus…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by sizzle chest: What happens to your theory if new, much faster Powermacs are introduced by the time the new G4 iMac is actually available?[/QB] Hey Sizzle, it (my theory) remains intact when the faster power macs are…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002
  • [quote]Originally posted by corvette: I agree, VelocityEngined. It is beginning to look like a fashion show, with only a turtlneck, a pair of jeans, and some BS hardware Don't think I am happy about this. Have you ever known another company to h…
    in Apple's lack of new hardware Comment by velocityengined January 2002